+1
Hello guys,
As announced few weeks ago let's try to release more alpha of our EE 7
spec jars. I added javamail as well since it got some nice fixes
(thanks Hendrik mainly) which are important to release since I saw too
much people replacing our implementation by javax one for small
! :)
-David
--
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
://fusesource.com
--
**
*Hiram Chirino*
*Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.*
*hchir...@redhat.com hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com*
*skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirinohttp://twitter.com/hiramchirino
*
*blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo http://hiramchirino.com/blog/*
:31 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Please vote for the geronimo xbean 3.9 release,.
The components up for vote are:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-349/org/apache/xbean/xbean/3.9/xbean-3.9-source-release.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories
72 Hours have passed. Closing the vote, I post the results in a new thread.
Regards,
Hiram
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com/
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:30 AM, James Strachan ja...@fusesource.com wrote:
+1
On 16 December 2011 14:31, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com wrote:
Please
Results of the XBean 3.9 release vote:
Vote passes with 4 binding +1 votes.
Thanks to all who voted. I'll start pushing out the release shortly.
Regards,
Hiram
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com/
Hi,
I was about to cleanup/close up the 3.9 XBean release in JIRA and I
noticed there are lots of unressolved issues assigned to 3.8 and 3.9,
Should I just moved those to 3.10?
Regards,
Hiram
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com/
, 2011, at 9:30 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
I've just added in a little feature which we really need in the next
version of ActiveMQ. Details at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-191
Are there any problems with doing a quick XBean 3.9 release soon?
No problems from my perspective
Please vote for the geronimo xbean 3.9 release,.
The components up for vote are:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-349/org/apache/xbean/xbean/3.9/xbean-3.9-source-release.tar.gz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hiram Chirino closed XBEAN-192.
---
Resolution: Fixed
xbean-spring bundle declared import on spring to be [2.5,3) which does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hiram Chirino updated XBEAN-192:
Fix Version/s: 3.9
Fixed in rev 1198799
xbean-spring bundle declared import
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-192
Project: XBean
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Hiram Chirino
Assignee: Hiram Chirino
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hiram Chirino closed XBEAN-192.
---
Had to change issue type.
xbean-spring bundle declared import on spring to be [2.5,3
I've just added in a little feature which we really need in the next
version of ActiveMQ. Details at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-191
Are there any problems with doing a quick XBean 3.9 release soon?
Regards,
Hiram
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com/
I just put one together. I'll open an issue and commit shortly.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Gary Tully gary.tu...@gmail.com wrote:
-1 if possible
sorry that I did not catch this earlier.
there is a problem with the auto generation of ActiveMQ configuration
schema
(activemq.xsd) and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hiram Chirino reassigned XBEAN-139:
---
Assignee: Hiram Chirino
XSD generation invalid: List fields declared as sequence of xs:any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12754171#action_12754171
]
Hiram Chirino commented on XBEAN-139:
-
Patch applied in rev 813877
XSD generation
+1
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've uploaded a distribution of Xbean 3.4.2 which includes the
following minor changes:
* Upgrade to ASM 3.1 and enable class reading speed boosts [1]
* Fix OSGi dynamic imports [2]
The staging repository is
Not yet.
On Dec 12, 2007 4:37 PM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you hear back from Marc about this?
--jason
On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:19 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
It was a bit of bummer when I noticed that GShell has no colorized
output on Windows. :(
But I noticed
It was a bit of bummer when I noticed that GShell has no colorized
output on Windows. :(
But I noticed that the Perl guys were able to do it. See the
Win32::Console::ANSI' project [1].
So I updated the jline dll that is used on Windows with the c code
that the Perl project is using and BAM!, we
+1
On 10/1/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote on releasing xbean 3.2.
Binaries / maven repo is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-3.2/
Svn source tag is available at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.2/
It includes
+1
On 8/1/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tagged an XBean 3.1 version at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.1/
Binaries:
http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage/org/apache/xbean/
Please review the tag/binaries and vote for this release. Once
+1
On 7/19/07, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does everyone feel about changing from the uber-spring jar (2M)
to the spring module jars? Here is a sizing chart:
spring-beans-2.0.5.jar379K
spring-context-2.0.5.jar 156K
+1
On 4/17/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have uploaded an XBean 3.0 release at
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-3.0/repo/org/apache/xbean/
This repo also contains older releases so that the meta-data is correct.
[ ] +1 Release XBean 3.0
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not
Both the AMQ issues now have fixes applied to the 4.1 branch.
On 2/22/07, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
This release is finally wrapping up. We are basically waiting on
final releases from the projects we depend on. Specifically, we need
releases from:
Sounds good to me. +1
On 2/21/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about switching to 3.0-SNAPSHOT
and dropping support for spring 2.0 release ?
The code of xbean-spring is split into
at least 4 modules, just to keep with the different
milestones and the older 1.x release ...
--
Sorry for the delay.
+1
On 2/5/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The vote is extended for another period of 3 days.
And here's my +1
On 2/1/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have fixed and uploaded the samples, the jbi plugin (which i had to
build manually)
and
awesome!
On 1/31/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The conluence wiki has been moved to
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Home
The space is not yet replicated to http://activemq.org or
http://activemq.apache.org (there's nothing atm) and there are still
some
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-1140:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 4.1.2)
4.1.0
Compression not working
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-1140.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.2.0
4.1.1
Added test case and fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_38427
]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-1140:
Fix in trunk rev 501506 and fixed in 4.1 branch in rev 501500
Compression
Hi Nathan,
We recently moved the confluence instance.. Something must have gotten
borked. I'll look into it. BUT... I think we are looking into moving
the space on to ASF managed machines.. not sure how long that will
take so, I'll try to get this fix for you ASAP in the mean time.
On
Thanks Oren!
On Jan 18, 2007, at 6:49 PM, Oren Ben-Kiki wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 18:09 -0500, Hiram Chirino wrote:
...
Yeah the differences between the two get a bit complex and IANAL
too :)
But I think the biggest difference between the Licenses are that
Apache licensed software
list...
Good luck,
Oren Ben-Kiki
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 21:41 -0500, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Oren,
Thanks for putting together your excellent http://ben-kiki.org/
oren/doxample/ !!
I work on a Messaging product called ActiveMQ. For more info see:
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
We
WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
Oren.
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 16:23 -0500, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Oren,
Thanks for the reply. Apache Projects can't distribute
Yep.. still need incubator votes until we actually make it to TLP.
On 1/17/07, Nathan Mittler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And here's my +1 ... bringing the totals to:
+1: 6
+0: 0
-1 : 0
Since the vote has been out for 3 days, I think it's safe to say that the
release passes.
Given that AMQ is
PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears that the Autoconf macros are under the GPL (as expected)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ac-archive/. What is the typical way we
deal with this at the ASF?
On 1/16/07, Nathan Mittler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great - thanks!
On 1/15/07, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL
Hi Nathan,
No I'm not really sure what it is but I assume it had to be something
BSDish.. I'll do a little digging and see what I can find.
On 1/15/07, Nathan Mittler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiram,
Do you know anything about the license in this file? Is it compatible with
the ASF?
Also,
Hi Oren,
Thanks for putting together your excellent http://ben-kiki.org/oren/doxample/ !!
I work on a Messaging product called ActiveMQ. For more info see:
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
We want to make use of your ac_doxygen.m4 file to get doxygen to work
with our build but we are
yes.
On 1/15/07, garima015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can i also send exception object ?? as Object Message
Hiram Chirino wrote:
But if that is not an option you could always send the hash map using
an ObjectMessage.
On 1/12/07, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try using 4.1.0 I
Are you using ActiveMQ 4.1.0 ???
On 1/12/07, garima015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have an urgent requirement in which i have to send Map as a message to
Queue
I am trying this code:
if(message instanceof Map){
MapMessage requestMessage = (MapMessage) session.createMapMessage();
Try using 4.1.0 I think it supports sending hashmaps of primitive data.
On 1/12/07, garima015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we are using 4.0.2
any solution?? i want to send hashmap
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Are you using ActiveMQ 4.1.0 ???
On 1/12/07, garima015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I
But if that is not an option you could always send the hash map using
an ObjectMessage.
On 1/12/07, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try using 4.1.0 I think it supports sending hashmaps of primitive data.
On 1/12/07, garima015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we are using 4.0.2
any solution
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Steve,
I would be happy to apply your patch but could you open a JIRA issue at:
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ
And attach your patch to that so that we have it properly documented
that you want to contribute your patch to the ASF.
Thanks!
Hiram
On 1
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Hiram Chirino
If a producer sends to a queue and blocks, any other producer sharing the same
connection even if he would be sending to an empty queue would also block.
This in effect can cause a deadlock if the right message processing flow is set
up
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hiram Chirino reassigned AMQ-1123:
--
Assignee: Hiram Chirino
Deadlocks can occur with even with sync sends since they share
Hi Steve,
I would be happy to apply your patch but could you open a JIRA issue at:
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ
And attach your patch to that so that we have it properly documented
that you want to contribute your patch to the ASF.
Thanks!
Hiram
On 1/10/07, rousseau [EMAIL
Running from activemq-openwire-generator doesn't help - that runs with
no errors but doesn't appear to do anything productive either. Can
you shed some light here?
Andrew
From: Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Openwire Generator Changes
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:14:05 -0800
For all you who
On 12/31/06, Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Hiram,
this change breaks org.apache.activemq.broker.RecoveryBrokerTest,
oorg.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerTest, etc for me.
yeah I think I have fix for that. sorry I broke it. I'm running the
test suite again now. Basically I think I
On 12/31/06, Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31 Dec 2006, at 07:59, Hiram Chirino wrote:
On 12/31/06, Rob Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Hiram,
this change breaks org.apache.activemq.broker.RecoveryBrokerTest,
oorg.apache.activemq.broker.BrokerTest, etc for me.
yeah I
Hi Motl,
We have not yet put together a formal specification for it. But I
guess it should be done, we are looking for a volunteer :)
What we have are code generators that will generate the openwire
marshallers for a few different languages. I did lots of working in
putting those generators
.
Really, I'm not looking for code generators, but more for some simple (might
be incomplete) description of openwire network protocol.
If I had one, I'd like to write an ethereal sniffer plugin for the protocol
in future, that could ease significantly development process.
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Motl
every DB is slightly different we just need to figure out how to do it
with sybase.
On 12/19/06, rain.xk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not used a pessimistic lock on database record in sybase ASE 12.5. :(
Is this the sybase's defect?
Hiram Chirino wrote:
How do you do a pessimistic lock
How do you do a pessimistic lock on database record in sybase ASE 12.5??
On 12/19/06, rain.xk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My database is sybaseASE12.5,and I use the activemq4.1.0.
The following is the series of messages when I start broker:
- ActiveMQ 4.1.0-incubator JMS Message Broker
Best bet is to run it with a profiler to figure out where the hot spot
is for linux.
On 12/18/06, garima015 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am facing a really bad performance of ActiveMq on linux box.
When running on windows 1000 transactions are taking 2 seconds and when
running on Linux same are
I would recommend that you use ActiveMQ 4.1
On 12/15/06, mar1394 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just upgraded from ActiveMQ-3.2.2 to ActiveMQ-4.0 RC2.
On all my pplatforms I am getting this exeption over and over when I try to
publish:
javax.jms.JMSException: java.io.InterruptedIOException
Just noticed that we are running late submitting our board report.
I'm going to post the following as our board report:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2006?action=edit
Please add anything you think is important.
=== ActiveMQ ===
Apache ActiveMQ is a messaging broker and client.
The
+1
On 12/18/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm starting a vote to release XBean 2.8.
There has not been much changes since 2.7, but a few
bugs fixed, and the addition of the xbean-finder module.
Anyway, the bugs are important enough to deserver a new
release (the generated schemas
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1078?page=comments#action_37604 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-1078:
fix in 4.1 branch rev 480862
Messages consumed with the Resource Adapter are intermittently not delivered
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Broker, Connector
Affects Versions: 4.0
Reporter: Hiram Chirino
Assigned To: Hiram Chirino
Fix For: 4.1.1, 4.2.0
The cause is that the ActiveMQSessionExecutor was starting and using it's
dispatch thread instead
On 11/27/06, J. Patrick Bedell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On 11/27/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/27/06, J. Patrick Bedell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm writing a custom interceptor that extends BrokerFilter in order
to process messages that are published to
That maven module actually has no java sources that is why non are
included the sources.jar. Perhaps we should delete it from the
directory structure.
Most of the other modules do have java sources.
On 11/20/06, Endre Stølsvik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
The sources.jar available at
Howdy ActiveMQ Mentors...
This is just a gentle reminder that this vote is still open and
looking for at least 1 more incubator PMC binding vote to make it
official. Please take a moment and review the release.
Thanks!
On 11/14/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey folks,
I
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1042?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-1042.
Resolution: Fixed
reverted in trunk rev 477356 and 4.1 branch rev 477357
Made the test case smarter so that the it would not intermittently fail
so something like:
p:TestICTPInterceptor dataSource=#derby-ds/
and make sure your TestICTPInterceptor has a setDataSource(DataSource
ds) method.
On 11/20/06, J. Patrick Bedell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to utilize (in the attached activemq configuration file)
the derby-ds
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1057?page=comments#action_37480 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-1057:
Also applied to 4.1 branch revision: 476144
consumer queue is empty when running requester
Well done!
On 11/17/06, Mittler, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to give everyone a heads up...
Last night I moved over all of the issues related to the activemq-cpp
client into the new ActiveMQ C++ JIRA Project. I've also updated the
changelog on the website to apply the filter against
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-6?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQCPP-6:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.0
add createDurableSubscriber() methods to Session.h
--
Key: AMQCPP-6
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-9?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQCPP-9:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.0
The Activemq-cpp example code no longer builds.
---
Key: AMQCPP-9
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-4?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQCPP-4:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.0
Compilation warning under windows for activemq-cpp
--
Key: AMQCPP-4
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-1?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQCPP-1:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.0
host_os env variable is empty in configure.ac
-
Key: AMQCPP-1
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-11?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQCPP-11:
Fix Version/s: 1.0
Update to activemq-cpp source to enable documentation generation
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-2?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQCPP-2:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.0
Release build of ActiveMQ-CPP from trunk with Visual Studio 2005 fails due to
Windows headers include order issue
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-7?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQCPP-7:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.0
ActiveMQ Cpp Windows Makefiles fail to link the test, and test-integration
targets
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-13?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQCPP-13:
Fix Version/s: 1.0
Patch to make activemq-cpp compile under sun studio 11
--
Key
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-3?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQCPP-3:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.0
Receiving a BytesMessage sent from Java using CMS listener causes exception
thrown in class BufferedInputStream
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-8?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQCPP-8:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.0
Code Drop for Version 0.0.2 of the activemq-cpp library
---
Key
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-12?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQCPP-12:
Fix Version/s: 1.0
Modified pom.xml for VS .net 2003 compilation
-
Key: AMQCPP-12
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-10?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQCPP-10:
Fix Version/s: 1.0
Compiling fails under SuSe
--
Key: AMQCPP-10
URL: https://issues.apache.org
BTW..
I just added version to the space and assigned all the resolved issue
to version 1.0.. If the fix for version field is properly assigned
on every issue then they will properly show up on the change long and
road map views of jira.
On 11/17/06, Mittler, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1042?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino reopened AMQ-1042:
This patch may need to get backed out. Some performance testing has shown that
in high throughput scenarios, we spend 300% of our time doing
I like it.. But I wonder if we can do something to handle streams out
of band in general. Here's a use case I'm thinking about...
A big file is being posted to a servlet and the servlet wants to pass
that input stream it's receiving to a JMS consumer somewhere in the
back end. So there is no
Ok.
Why does the producer need to decide if the stream is sent out of band or not??
On 11/16/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/16/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like it.. But I wonder if we can do something to handle streams out
of band in general. Here's
On 11/16/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/16/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok.
Why does the producer need to decide if the stream is sent out of band or
not??
I see what you mean now.
Otherwise how would ActiveMQ know whether or not to send a URL
Reporter: Hiram Chirino
Assigned To: Hiram Chirino
Fix For: 4.2.0
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1056?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-1056.
Resolution: Fixed
Implemented in trunk revision 475848
If a message takes a while to transmit to the broker either because :
* sender connection is slow
Well it looks like we have pretty good consensus on moving to java 5
I'll start updating the build shortly.
On 11/15/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
How do you guys feel about switching the minimum run time requirement
for ActiveMQ 4.2 to be Java 5?? I'm itching to do
will not change to timestamp, then deploy will
just overwrite the existing artifacts.
Regards,
Fritz
- Original Message -
From: Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 12:52 AM
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ POM
Thanks Fritz!
I knew
Hi folks,
How do you guys feel about switching the minimum run time requirement
for ActiveMQ 4.2 to be Java 5?? I'm itching to do this since Java 5
has a much better set of concurrent implementation.
We can keep the 4.1.x branch alive as the Java 1.4 compatible version.
Also I have a feeling
Well..
I think we should get used to it. We should always keep at least 1
stable branch.
On 11/15/06, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/15/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
How do you guys feel about switching the minimum run time requirement
for ActiveMQ 4.2
on Java 5 only - but allow deployments on 1.4
I agree.. but I don't want to condition the switch to 1.5 on getting
the retrotranslator stuff working first. If we get the
retrotranslator stuff working.. well that should just be the gravy.
On 11/15/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
but a downside that merging patches from 4.2.x - 4.1.x will be
more difficult.
How about annotations?? any places where you think those would make more sense?
On 11/15/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
How do you guys feel about switching the minimum run time requirement
for ActiveMQ
Nathan,
Nice work on putting together the activemq-cpp release page!
http://activemq.com/site/activemq-cpp-10-release.html
How hard was it to build that change log? Would it make it simpler if
the ActiveMQ cpp stuff it's own Jira space???
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
/activemq/browse/AMQ-1052
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 4.0
Reporter: Hiram Chirino
Assigned To: Hiram Chirino
Fix For: 4.1.1, 4.1.2
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent
On 11/15/06, Endre Stølsvik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi folks,
How do you guys feel about switching the minimum run time requirement
for ActiveMQ 4.2 to be Java 5?? I'm itching to do this since Java 5
has a much better set of concurrent implementation.
We can keep
Want to take the lead on that? :) please!
On 11/15/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes!
We should present a fully formed resolution, based on the OFBiz thread.
-Brian
On Nov 15, 2006, at 10:52 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
I think this project is like the 40 year old virgin still
Why don't we get the ball rolling on graduation and IF they choose to
make us a TLP, then we start looking into that??
On 11/15/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 15, 2006, at 12:14 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Want to take the lead on that? :) please!
Sure. Any nominations
just
have to select every resolved issue that was targeted for that
particular release of AMQ-CPP.
Nate
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram
Chirino
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 12:41 PM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject
On 11/14/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the main problem is that users will never
download newest versions. IMHO, this would be a bad
idea.
yeah.
On 11/14/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Fritz!
I knew there had to be a reason that I was just
work.
On 11/14/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Endre,
Thanks for the feedback but I don't agree that this issue should hold
up the release. I'm sure we can fix this in a subsequent bug fix
release.
BTW, if you submit a patch with the fix for this it would make getting
the fix
1 - 100 of 959 matches
Mail list logo
