Re: [DISCUSS] Guacamole Podling Report (Draft) - November 2017

ling's maturity? > Please feel free to add your own commentary. > > [ ] Initial setup > [ ] Working towards first release > [ ] Community building > [X] Nearing graduation > [ ] Other: > > Date of last release: > > 2017-07-30 (0.9.13-incubating) > >

[DISCUSS] Java Version 1.6 Support

This has come up in a couple of PRs, so I wanted to throw this out for discussion. Currently most of the Guacamole client code is targeted at Java 1.6 compatibility (via entries in the pom.xml files). There have been a couple of instances where that was a minor inconvenience, though not all that

Re: Reported issues with RemoteApp screen size / clipping (GUACAMOLE-125)

> Thanks, Nick - I hope something jumps out. The fact that the problem > disappears after upgrading and doing a reboot dance is troubling. On one > hand, it does suggest that there is something FreeRDP-specific about this, > but if the problem does not occur when xfreerdp is used, then there must

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Guacamole as TLP

persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Guacamole > Project: > > * Carl Harris <cehar...@apache.org> > * Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> > * Frode Langelo<fr...@apach

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Release?

> > > As the fix within #118 for GUACAMOLE-384 (a low-impact segfault during > disconnect) involves changing the order resources are freed prior to > joining on the SSH client thread, there is the potential here for a > regression resulting in deadlock, which would affect the stability of > the

Re: Guacamole Feature Request

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:36 AM, wrote: > Hello Guys > > Currently guacamole does not allow having each user with his/her private > ssh-key and username defined. > Well, yes on the private key - kind of on the username. If the user's Guacamole username differs from the

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Release?

> > Great - sounds like we're in agreement. ;) > > I'll retag things as described and create the > "staging/0.9.14-incubating" branches [1]. Once the staging branches > exist, depending on the issue, some PRs may need to be updated to > point to the new branch as their merge base. > > - Mike > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Release?

> > I'll retag things as described and create the > "staging/0.9.14-incubating" branches [1]. Once the staging branches > exist, depending on the issue, some PRs may need to be updated to > point to the new branch as their merge base. > > - Mike > > [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Release?

> > The X.Org driver works pretty darn well and is stable. It's the first > part of guacamole-server to fully leverage the client-side compositing > features of the Guacamole protocol for things like window movement, so > things which would normally not be that fast are quite fast and > smooth. In

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Release?

> > I would be in favor of finalizing scope for 0.9.14-incubating. There's > quite a few changes ready, and several others waiting only on review > or documentation: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > 3D%20Guacamole%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.14-incubating > > ... > >

[DISCUSS] Next Release?

So, I saw Mike updating some JIRA issues for fix releases - not sure if that was some work to prep for a new release? It's been about 3 months since our last one, with several significant changes - are we ready to push out 0.9.14-incubating, here, soon? When we talked a while back we were

Re: [DISCUSS] Stalled PRs

> > My blunt opinion would be that we should never take over changes. The > point of an open source community like Apache Guacamole is > collaboration. There's a big difference between a contribution from a > contributor who is working together with the existing development > community for the

Re: [DISCUSS] Stalled PRs

On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Nick Couchman <vn...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I did track down e-mail address (via JIRA) for the two folks with the > aforementioned PRs and e-mailed them directly to see if they could finish > up the PRs. I have not heard anything bac

Re: [DISCUSS] JDBC SQLite Module?

> > >> Well, got it most of the way done and hitting an obnoxious bug or issue > that I can't pinpoint exactly where it's coming from. Four of the queries > - two in the ConnectionMapper.xml file and two in the > ConnectionGroupMapper.xml file - are causing some problems. One example is > below.

Re: [DISCUSS] JDBC SQLite Module?

> > Sounds great to me. > > +1 > > - Mike > Well, got it most of the way done and hitting an obnoxious bug or issue that I can't pinpoint exactly where it's coming from. Four of the queries - two in the ConnectionMapper.xml file and two in the ConnectionGroupMapper.xml file - are causing some

[DISCUSS] JDBC SQLite Module?

Just wanted to throw this out for discussion - is there any interest in a JDBC SQLite module? Seems like maybe it would provide a good method for people to test/tinker with Guacamole before actually implementing it. I can do a JIRA issue and pull request if there's interest, or not...? -Nick

Re: Heeeeyyy - someone posted us to Hacker News :)

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Mike Jumper <mike.jum...@guac-dev.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Nick Couchman <vn...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Mike Jumper <mike.jum...@guac-dev.org> > > wrote: &g

Re: Heeeeyyy - someone posted us to Hacker News :)

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: > I noticed a spike in traffic to guacamole.incubator.apache.org this > morning > (an order of magnitude higher than the normal amount of traffic at this > time of day). Checking the referrals revealed: > Also, I think

Re: Heeeeyyy - someone posted us to Hacker News :)

Nice. Gotta love publicity! On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: > I noticed a spike in traffic to guacamole.incubator.apache.org this > morning > (an order of magnitude higher than the normal amount of traffic at this > time of day). Checking the

Re: [DISCUSS] Stalled PRs

> > > ... > > For the two PRs I mentioned above, I'm happy to take a stab at trying to > > contact those people directly, see if I can locate those e-mail addresses > > and get a response from them. > > > If you fetch the changes into your local clone of the repository, or view > the patch form of

Re: [DISCUSS] Stalled PRs

> > To magically close #174, I included "closes #174" in my commit message. > GitHub will then automatically close the pull request noted once that > commit message is merged to master. Unless we're doing changes elsewhere > which remove the need for the original PRs, we won't be able to do this.

Re: [DISCUSS] Discontinuing uploads to SourceForge entirely

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Mike Jumper wrote: > Before the Incubator, Guacamole was originally hosted on SourceForge. The > old SourceForge project has long since been closed down, but I've been > continuing to copy release artifacts to the old SourceForge

[DISCUSS] Stalled PRs

There are a couple of pull requests that have stalled with no response from the original author. Okay, I have one myself that I need to go back and finish up, but I'm more concerned about a couple of them that fix bugs or other undesirable behavior. Before I go over the individual issues, Mike,

Re: [DISCUSS] Guacamole CI Builds

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Mike Jumper <mike.jum...@guac-dev.org> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Nick Couchman <vn...@apache.org> wrote: > > > There's been some churn in the community of folks wanting some support > for > > continuous integration

[DISCUSS] Guacamole CI Builds

There's been some churn in the community of folks wanting some support for continuous integration with the Guacamole repos. Travis CI has come up a couple of times - I stumbled across it and thought it might be useful, and another contributor opened a PR for adding the travis.yml files for the

Re: Help with Text Input in Prompt

> > You'll need to disable client handling of keyboard events when anything > outside the client needs keyboard events. This is what is done when the > Guacamole menu is opened following Ctrl+Alt+Shift, to allow the user to > type within the clipboard textarea: > >

Help with Text Input in Prompt

Well, I'm trying to get parameter prompting working in Guacamole and am running into an issue that I'm having a very hard time figuring out. I've got prompting to the point where, when you click on the connection, it grabs the parameters that need to be prompted and displays a dialog in the

Re: RES: [DISCUSS] Development of Guacamole Administrative Improvements

with your God? --Micah 6:8-- == On Tuesday, August 29, 2017, 11:42:21 AM EDT, Thiago dos Santos Nunes <thi...@digitalinformatica.com.br> wrote: Any progress on this discussion? Please, don´t let die this amazing things! Stay with GOD! Aude et Effice! -Mensagem original- De: Nick Co

[DISCUSS] Travis CI Integration?

Just wondering if anyone has any opinions on integrating Guacamole with Travis CI and the presence of the travis.yml file in the base of the Guacamole repo?   I'm not sure if ASF has a position on this, or if there's something already available through ASF for continuous integration? -Nick == He

Re: Reported issues with RemoteApp screen size / clipping (GUACAMOLE-125)

provide any more information. -Nick On Sunday, August 13, 2017, 10:17:30 PM EDT, Nick Couchman <nick.couch...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: Okay, some initial observations on this:- I am able to reproduce the issue, and xfreerdp appears to behave correctly while Guacamole exhibits the be

Re: Reported issues with RemoteApp screen size / clipping (GUACAMOLE-125)

Okay, some initial observations on this:- I am able to reproduce the issue, and xfreerdp appears to behave correctly while Guacamole exhibits the behavior described in the JIRA issue (more or less).  That doesn't mean I'm pointing the finger at Guacamole, at least, not totally - it actually

Re: [DISCUSS] Guacamole Podling Report (Draft) - August 2017

r PPMC members elected?   The following committers have been elected since Guacamole began incubation:     * Nick Couchman - 2017-02-09     * Frode Langelo - 2016-04-03   As of the VOTE on 2016-12-09, all committers are implicitly members of the   PPMC.

Re: Handling disconnects in Guacamole.Client/WebSocketTunnel

On Tuesday, August 1, 2017, 11:18:24 AM EDT, Or Cohen wrote: > Should I open a JIRA issue first? If you have a fix to contribute, yes, the first step is opening a JIRA issue, then forking the github repo, making your change, and opening a pull request where you tag the PR

Re: [DISCUSS] Scope of 0.9.13-incubating

still present and you are immediately logged back in and immediately connected to the only connection I have configured. When logout is clicked, is there a way to detect the Guacamole cookie and remove it from the browser? Regards Kaushik Srinivasan On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Nick Co

Re: [DISCUSS] Scope of 0.9.13-incubating

issues in that architecture. Regards Kaushik Srinivasan On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Kaushik Srinivasan <kausr...@umail.iu.edu> wrote: > Ah, I see. I will test it in a day or two and get back to you. > > Sorry for the delay. > > Regards > Kaushik Srinivasan > > On 2

Re: [DISCUSS] Scope of 0.9.13-incubating

JIRA issue GUACAMOLE-355 has been created to track this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-355 -Nick On Monday, July 24, 2017, 8:44:48 PM EDT, Nick Couchman <nick.couch...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: I'm fairly certain this is the issue - I was able to set up Guacamole

Re: [DISCUSS] Scope of 0.9.13-incubating

in the CAS module to throw meaningful errors when it cannot find the CAS service. -Nick On Monday, July 24, 2017, 8:38:04 PM EDT, Nick Couchman <nick.couch...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: Hey, Kaushik, I'm still working on getting the RPi environment set up here and getting Guacamole r

Re: [DISCUSS] Scope of 0.9.13-incubating

Hey, Kaushik, I'm still working on getting the RPi environment set up here and getting Guacamole running in it.  I do have one more suggestion for you to try while I work on that - I see in your guacamole.properties file you have your cas-authorization-endpoint set to

Re: [DISCUSS] Scope of 0.9.13-incubating

ad CAS into extensions folder manually and stop tomcat and restart for it to take effect. You are right and it won't work if u place the extension outside the /guacamole/extension folder. That's why I put it there. Thanks for checking the setup. Regards Kaushik Srinivasan On 18 Jul 2017 8:42 a.m., "Ni

Re: [DISCUSS] Scope of 0.9.13-incubating

On Monday, July 17, 2017, 11:08:06 PM EDT, Mike Jumper wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Kaushik Srinivasan > wrote: >> >> ... >> >> Also there's a major information I might have left out. I have been setting >> all this up in Docker.

Re: [DISCUSS] Scope of 0.9.13-incubating

17 Jul 2017 8:54 a.m., "Nick Couchman" <nick.couch...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > So, I checked out the staging/0.9.13-incubating branch of the repo and > built the client and extensions, loaded the JDBC and CAS modules, and then > loaded Guacamole.  I am not seeing any sort

Re: [DISCUSS] Scope of 0.9.13-incubating

wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Thank you for the information. I will work on using Guacamole 0.9.13 and > see how I can add the connection through some module. > > Thank you for your time. > > Regards > Kaushik Srinivasan > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Nick Couchm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.13-incubating (RC1)

with 0.9.12 - there were a couple of commits to the main Guacamole client code to deal with the redirection, that I believe they are probably hitting an incompatibility between those versions. -Nick On Thursday, July 13, 2017, 9:01:16 AM EDT, Nick Couchman <nick.couch...@yahoo.com.INVALID>

Re: [DISCUSS] Scope of 0.9.13-incubating

On Thursday, July 13, 2017, 9:54:47 AM EDT, Kaushik Srinivasan wrote: > Hi Nick > Thanks a lot for helping me out. > I'm currently using Guacamole-0.9.12 and CAS version is 3.4.1. The CAS > module was obtained from the github (incubator-guacamole-client >

Re: [DISCUSS] Scope of 0.9.13-incubating

On Thursday, July 13, 2017, 9:00:05 AM EDT, Nick Couchman <nick.couch...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: > On Tuesday, July 11, 2017, 9:58:59 PM EDT, Kaushik Srinivasan > <kausr...@umail.iu.edu> wrote: >> Hello All, >> I've been trying to test the CAS module for guacamo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.13-incubating (RC1)

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Nick Couchman < nick.couch...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 > On Monday, July 10, 2017, 1:43:35 AM EDT, Mike Jumper < > mike.jum...@guac-dev.org> wrote: > > Hello all, > > The first release candidate for Apache Guacamole 0.9.13-incu

Re: [DISCUSS] Scope of 0.9.13-incubating

On Tuesday, July 11, 2017, 9:58:59 PM EDT, Kaushik Srinivasan wrote: > Hello All, > > I've been trying to test the CAS module for guacamole. Once I login to the > CAS page, I'm redirected to the Guacamole server but the page gets stuck in > an Infinite loop. I believe

Re: Build from source from github.com's incubator-guacamole-server source

Albert,Yes, there are files that are deliberately not put in the Git repository.  This isn't just a one-off decision or oversight by the Guacamole team - you'll find in many, many cases when source code is distributed that the source control repositories lack those build files, relying on you

Re: [DISCUSS] Cleaning up Old PRs

On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 2:50 AM, Mike Jumper wrote: > I'd be glad to follow up on the SSH keepalive PRs - they're invitingly > small, though I probably won't be able to find time for that until > later this week. Cool. > For the other PRs which are still open but

[DISCUSS] Cleaning up Old PRs

So, was looking through pull requests for each of the components, and there are some that haven't been touched in a while.  Some appear to be waiting on project members to review, and some waiting on the contributors to respond.   I'm wondering if it's worth dedicating some effort to going back

[DISCUSS] Resource Collection and Permissions

Loosely related to the other discussion item I just sent, but one of the ideas I've thrown out there for updating connection weights inside the Guacamole Client is to create a REST API endpoint that can be used to POST the connection weight and have the field in the database updated.  The goal

[DISCUSS] GUACAMOLE-102: Scope of Load Balancing Issue

Hello, everyone,Mike suggested throwing this out for discussion.  For history, you can read the JIRA GUACAMOLE-102 issue and see the back-and-forth there, but essentially we could use some input deciding what the scope of issue 102 should be.  A recent PR added a connection_weight field in the

Re: [DISCUSS] Old pre-Apache Guacamole Facebook and Twitter accounts

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 10:23 AM, Mike Jumper wrote: > Hi all, > The Guacamole project maintained a Facebook page and Twitter account > prior to moving to the Incubator. For simplicity's sake, the buttons > for those were removed from the website during the

Re: [DISCUSS] Scope of 0.9.13-incubating

> Hello all, > > I'd like to begin the discussion of scope for the 0.9.13-incubating > release. Issues currently tagged for 0.9.13 can be found here: > >  >https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20Guacamole%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.13-incubating>> > There are quite a

Re: Power PPC byte order issues?

Larry,Also, can you specify which PPC platform you're running on - what hardware, chip, etc.? -Nick On Monday, May 22, 2017 8:23 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: Can you confirm whether the other protocols like VNC are similarly affected? I'm curious whether this issue

Re: A question about Base64 of Guacamole

> I'm reading the code of Guacamole for the purpose of learning , and I want to > know why  chose Base64 to encode image data. As far as I know, it will > enlarge the total size of data transmission over network. Why not just send > binary data? I have read the official document, and it

Re: download error upper 4GB shared file ver 0.9.12

> On Apr 20, 2017, at 03:41, Hiroki Niinuma wrote: > > Hi All. > > In ver 0.9.12, > > I tried large shared file download from guacmenu. > result, > 4294967295byte(4GB-1) OK, > 4294967296byte(4GB) Failure. > > Upper 4GB file downloading is not ending. >

Re: GuacamoleWebSocketTunnelEndpoint Implementation

> On Apr 4, 2017, at 16:39, Bruno Savard wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm adding WebSocket support to my Guacamole-driven application. > > Mike suggested me to use GuacamoleWebSocketTunnelEndpoint. For now I'm > creating a simple tutorial to achieve this. > > My simple client

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

Quite a list of improvements - looks really good! +1, Go Flight! -Nick On Sunday, March 19, 2017 7:49 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: Hello all, The first release candidate for Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating has been uploaded and is ready for VOTE. The draft