On 03/11/2011 08:49, johann Sorel wrote:
You are right, if they want they can use it with this license but
still it's a source of problems. we have plenty of different licenses
out there, MIT, BSD, GPL ... and some more license we surely be
created in the futur, mixing them is not always fun.
+1
On 29/10/2011 10:03, Tim Ellison wrote:
Please vote on the proposal to move Apache Harmony to the Apache Attic.
[+1] Move Harmony to the Attic
[ 0] Don't care
[-1] Don't move Harmony to the Attic.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Tim
rather than this
voting thread.
Regards,
Tim
On 29/10/2011 10:03, Tim Ellison wrote:
Please vote on the proposal to move Apache Harmony to the Apache Attic.
[+1] Move Harmony to the Attic
[ 0] Don't care
[-1] Don't move Harmony to the Attic.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
,
Ray, Regis and Tim (count = 20)
-1 from Da Feng, liou (count = 2)
On 03/11/2011 11:39, Tim Ellison wrote:
I count 18 people voting +1 and two people voting -1 -- so the vote passes.
I will begin the process of moving Harmony to the Attic.
Thank you to everyone who voted.
p.s. In case you
On 29/10/2011 10:02, Tim Ellison wrote:
I will start a vote (on a new thread) for you to express your
opinion.
Last call for votes -- please either cast your vote now on the voting
thread, or let me know you want more time.
Regards,
Tim
Back in March I wrote [1] about the choice facing our community to
either find a new goal for Apache Harmony, or move the project under the
responsibility of the Apache Attic project [2].
There has been no significant activity in Apache Harmony since, so it
would seem appropriate to make the
Please vote on the proposal to move Apache Harmony to the Apache Attic.
[+1] Move Harmony to the Attic
[ 0] Don't care
[-1] Don't move Harmony to the Attic.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Tim
On 29/10/2011 10:13, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Sounds right... Too sad to see this happening.
Will the code remain in an svn repo? I don't see much in the attic svn repo.
The process is described here [1]. The Harmony SVN will be marked
read-only, so anyone can still obtain the code to use
On 29/10/2011 12:18, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
Am 29.10.2011 11:02, schrieb Tim Ellison:
Back in March I wrote [1] about the choice facing our community to
either find a new goal for Apache Harmony, or move the project under the
responsibility of the Apache Attic project [2].
There has been
On 29/10/2011 15:59, Gregory Shimansky wrote:
В Сбт, 29/10/2011 в 15:55 +0200, Christian Grobmeier пишет:
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Am 29.10.2011 14:53, schrieb Tim Ellison:
On 29/10/2011 10:13, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Sounds
This is a monthly automated mailing to the Apache Harmony dev list.
The Apache Harmony project welcomes the participation and input of
anyone interested in open source Java platform, the goal of our project.
For more information about the Apache Harmony project, please see the
project website.
This is a monthly automated mailing to the Apache Harmony dev list.
The Apache Harmony project welcomes the participation and input of
anyone interested in open source Java platform, the goal of our project.
For more information about the Apache Harmony project, please see the
project website.
This is a monthly automated mailing to the Apache Harmony dev list.
The Apache Harmony project welcomes the participation and input of
anyone interested in open source Java platform, the goal of our project.
For more information about the Apache Harmony project, please see the
project website.
7, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com
mailto:t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
Clinton,
Thanks again for taking the time to tell us about your experience with
an antivirus program flagging a warning with 'javaw.exe'.
A couple of us have double-checked the files
This is a monthly automated mailing to the Apache Harmony dev list.
The Apache Harmony project welcomes the participation and input of
anyone interested in open source Java platform, the goal of our project.
For more information about the Apache Harmony project, please see the
project website.
This is a monthly automated mailing to the Apache Harmony dev list.
The Apache Harmony project welcomes the participation and input of
anyone interested in open source Java platform, the goal of our project.
For more information about the Apache Harmony project, please see the
project website.
As will be obvious to regular readers of this list, the Apache Harmony
development community has seen a steady reduction in capacity over the
last few months.
Having a period of reflection and reassessment after the turmoil
surrounding the JCK licensing issue is natural, and there has been some
Which bit would you change?
Tim
On 01/Feb/2011 14:42, Pavel Pervov wrote:
I'd suggest changing the text to reflect the changes in Java landscape...
2011/2/1, telli...@apache.org telli...@apache.org:
This is a monthly automated mailing to the Apache Harmony dev list.
The Apache Harmony
On 07/Jan/2011 06:30, Jimmy,Jing Lv wrote:
Hi Jesse,
Yes in early Harmony development, we have an agreement that we will
follow RI's behavior to make Harmony compatible to serve more application as
possible - which includes exceptions etc (unless RI does break spec or is
not
I've tested the current code in the 5.0 branch on Windows XP / MSVC 2003.
I see 25,573 passes, 6 failures, and 7 errors. The test failures are in
the usual culprits, i.e. Swing (2) and JDWP (11).
Swing:
BoxLayoutTest#testLayoutContainerVertical
BasicScrollBarUITest#testGetThumbBounds
JDWP:
On 15/Dec/2010 14:33, Sian January wrote:
I think the failure that the Hudson build and Ray are seeing in
pack200 is a regression introduced in r996801 (i.e. since the last
milestone). I can't reproduce it due to being in the UK where the
timezone offset is 0, but the fix should be as
Ok, builds are almost back to normal now. It required re-installing a
number of dev packages on our build system after the machine was rebuilt.
I'm seeing a single failure in the sanity test
http://s.apache.org/fM
So building, but still not running clean just yet.
Regards,
Tim
On 08/Dec/2010
On 13/Dec/2010 08:23, Ray Chen wrote:
Hi Comitters,
I have reviewed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6656, seems
look good.
I remember that there should be at least two committers to agree to apply a
patch during code freeze time, right?
Does anyone else can help to review
I'd like to update the help text that is printed when you try to run the
build without ECJ installed, as it recommends copying the JAR file from
a non-existent location.
Anyone support this fix in time for the milestone?
Regards,
Tim
Index: common_resources/make/properties.xml
to the
next milestone?
Regards,
Tim
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/Dec/2010 08:23, Ray Chen wrote:
Hi Comitters,
I have reviewed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6656,
seems
look good.
I remember that there should be at least
-- otherwise the
code is changing and we never converge on a milestone.
If you think this needs to be fixed, just say why, otherwise we'll move
the target out to a later date.
Regards,
Tim
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/Dec/2010 15:40, Ray Chen
Our regular Board report is due. As always, if there is anything you
want raised either add a line to the wiki [1] or reply here.
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Board201012
Regards,
Tim
On 08/Dec/2010 09:21, Ray Chen wrote:
For https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6419, I have applied it
and run the test, seems it works well and no regression.
I think it should be committed.
Any comments?
I agree. Patch applied at r1043880.
Regards,
Tim
Looks like a Hudson configuration problem
FATAL: command execution failed.Maybe you need to configure the job to
choose one of your Ant installations?
I'll raise it on the builds@ list. The machine was rebuilt recently so
likely there is a directory missing.
Regards,
Tim
On 08/Dec/2010
On 07/Dec/2010 14:54, Joe Droider wrote:
We are looking into Harmony jvm as a platform for an embedded device. The
embedded device is based off stripped down version of Linux. The processor
it runs on is powerpc based.
The kernel version is 2.6.33.3-rt17.p2.21 #1 PREEMPT RT.
Is there a port
it?
Sure. If others want to review it too that is fine ;-)
Regards,
Tim
Let's make new milstones for the coming New Year! :)
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/Nov/2010 13:55, Ray Chen wrote:
Hmmm... Ok, I think it will take some time to understand
On 30/Nov/2010 13:55, Ray Chen wrote:
Hmmm... Ok, I think it will take some time to understand these for some time.
Maybe we should put this milestone off for serveral days before I
understand all the process.
Hi Ray,
Thanks for volunteering to do some RM. I can also help with the process.
On 12/Nov/2010 00:19, Krystal Mok wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/Nov/2010 02:21, Krystal Mok wrote:
Thank you very much. I didn't know enough about the layout of Apache
projects' archives. Now it's much clearer to me what's the correct
check-up.
Regards,
Tim
On 2 November 2010 15:31, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/Oct/2010 11:29, Tim Ellison wrote:
All Apache projects have been asked to abide by these foundation-wide
guidelines [1].
Having a quick look down the list of things that are expected, it seems
On 31/Oct/2010 20:23, chris.g...@k-embedded-java.com wrote:
I think all options and opinions are open for discussion. We could
simply continue with the current goal and encourage the Apache Board to
seek the JCK license by whatever means is posible, we could modify our
goal and plan to
On 18/Oct/2010 11:29, Tim Ellison wrote:
All Apache projects have been asked to abide by these foundation-wide
guidelines [1].
Having a quick look down the list of things that are expected, it seems
we have a few site patches to make.
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs
The Harmony PMC have had a brief discussion about the goals of the
Harmony project, based upon statements made in the last JCP face to face
meeting. Now that the nature of those statements has become public
elsewhere [1], the 'Harmony goals' discussion can move onto the public
list here.
As you
On 11/Oct/2010 20:46, Alex Blewitt wrote:
According to Oracle, IBM's going to work with OpenJDK in the future.
There's another post which claims this means Harmony will be
abandoned and people moved over to working on OpenJDK. Is there any
truth to the latter part of this rumour?
Alex,
Let's
On 05/Oct/2010 00:09, Jesse Wilson wrote:
I'm planning to do some work on the Harmony 6 tests. I'm planning to do
small improvements: isolating tests for security managers, replace
assertTrue() with assertEquals(), etc. This work will be driven by me trying
to get Android's class library
On 04/Oct/2010 09:15, Mark Hindess wrote:
When filling out the ACQ[0], at the point you are asked about
exposure, you have been given no reason to discount exposure to
Apache Harmony (or other ALv2 compatible implementations such as
Android). It is only after you've stated your exposure (in
On 01/Oct/2010 16:43, Mark Hindess wrote:
Our modular structure means we have many jars that need to be read at
startup, this is always going to give us a disadvantage in terms of
startup time compared to implementations with fewer jars.
Do you have some measurements? Why is it always going
On 24/Aug/2010 16:46, Sian January wrote:
On 19 August 2010 03:29, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/Aug/2010 08:51, Sian January wrote:
I've just run the federated build from scratch and it all went
smoothly except that I had to change the sourceforge mirror in all
On behalf of the Apache Harmony PMC, I am delighted to welcome four new
committers to the project :
Ray Chen
Catherine Hope
Charles Lee
Lang Yang
All four of them have made sustained, high quality contributions to the
project both in the codebase and in the community discussions.
On 24/Sep/2010 17:51, Deven You wrote:
Here is the result of Specjbb
I don't have a copy of Specjbb to try, so sorry it broke that. I think
I can set up a harmony unit test to emulate the problem here once we
have an acceptable solution.
Snipped stack trace follows...
java.util.Locale
On 24/Sep/2010 06:58, Robert Muir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:49 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
System.out.println(new File(σ.txt).hashCode());
System.out.println(new File(ς.txt).hashCode());
prints out
889962580
890776533
on both Harmony and the RI.
but perhaps
(ULocale.java:109)
... 54 more
FAILED to invoke JVM.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/Sep/2010 06:58, Robert Muir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:49 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
System.out.println(new File
)
at java.util.Locale.init(Locale.java:228)
at java.util.Locale.init(Locale.java:201)
at java.util.Locale.clinit(Locale.java:51)
at com.ibm.icu.util.ULocale.clinit(ULocale.java:109)
... 54 more
FAILED to invoke JVM.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli
:228)
at java.util.Locale.init(Locale.java:201)
at java.util.Locale.clinit(Locale.java:51)
at com.ibm.icu.util.ULocale.clinit(ULocale.java:109)
... 54 more
FAILED to invoke JVM.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 24
init.
2010/9/24 Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com
On 24/Sep/2010 08:17, Deven You wrote:
I have saw the error before, and I have some investigation of it. I think
the root cause is the commit change the class load order. Before this
commit, Locale class will be loaded before ULocale class
init.
2010/9/24 Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com
On 24/Sep/2010 08:17, Deven You wrote:
I have saw the error before, and I have some investigation of it. I think
the root cause is the commit change the class load order. Before this
commit, Locale class will be loaded before ULocale class
+1
On 23/Sep/2010 08:38, Mark Hindess wrote:
I've just seen some poor code for a simple HTTP server doing:
Content-Type: text/html; charset= + charset
which on the RI gives the expected:
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
but on Harmony gives:
Content-Type:
On 23/Sep/2010 12:17, Mark Hindess wrote:
I've been looking at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6535
and wondering about build processes particularly for releases.
Some of you might have noticed (as I checked in my scripts recently[0]),
that I try quite hard to ensure
/File.html#hashCode%28%29
Regards,
Tim
On 23/Sep/2010 12:21, Robert Muir wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/Sep/2010 01:10, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
I thought about this too,
one concern (not knowing if there are more cases involved) would
On 24/Sep/2010 03:55, Robert Muir wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
So you'll see that I reverted the new String impl until we fix up the
possible cases in the boot sequence.
I was reviewing the callers of toLowerCase(), and see that
File
On 24/Sep/2010 05:28, Robert Muir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. Seems strange since it could obviously produce some 'unusual'
results. In this case, computing a hashCode, it likely doesn't matter
if the result is a bogus string
On 24/Sep/2010 06:13, Robert Muir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/Sep/2010 05:28, Robert Muir wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks. Seems strange since it could obviously produce some
On 22/Sep/2010 15:13, Robert Muir wrote:
Should I update the harmony wiki here
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Application_Status to include my tests
results with Lucene?
At the moment, all tests are passing with harmony on both our trunk (4.x)
and 3.x release branches.
The only exception is
On 23/Sep/2010 01:10, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
I thought about this too,
one concern (not knowing if there are more cases involved) would be
if the input should be ascii, but could be something else. if
String.toLowerCase had the ascii special-case with a fallback to ICU,
it could fail
On 22/Sep/2010 01:39, Robert Muir wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Mark Hindess
mark.hind...@googlemail.comwrote:
I'd recommend running the federated build ... i.e. ant build test in
/home/rmuir/workspace/harmony-trunk in your case.
Thank you! I knew I was missing something.
On 21/Sep/2010 22:19, Robert Muir wrote:
2. I think some files are missing svn:eol-style. For example, although i
have not modified anything I see:
M
classlib/modules/luni/src/test/api/common/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/java/net/URLEncoderTest.java
M
I'm delighted to announce that the Apache Board of Directors have
accepted the PMC's recommendation to appoint Regix Xu as a new member of
the Apache Harmony PMC.
The PMC is tasked with official oversight for the procedural, legal,
release and community oversight. Regis has demonstrated his
On 16/Sep/2010 12:32, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
Does this mean harmony might need these methods for its own internal
use before ICU is available?
Yes, String is used early in the bootstrapping, and having dependencies
on ICU functionality leads to an initialization circularity.
i.e. if I
On 16/Sep/2010 14:16, Robert Muir wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/Sep/2010 12:32, Robert Muir (JIRA) wrote:
Does this mean harmony might need these methods for its own internal
use before ICU is available?
Yes, String is used early
On 16/Sep/2010 14:30, Robert Muir wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I agree (though I don't know what happens when it is uppercased
'properly' in Turkish)
in this case it would be uppercased to US-ASCİİ (note the dotted i's)
Nah
On 16/Sep/2010 16:04, Robert Muir wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
The principle works ok. I attached a patch on HARMONY-6649 to show that
making a local toUpperCase() method for the charset names solves the
circularity problem
The Apache Harmony development team are pleased to announce the
immediate availability of 5.0 Milestone 15 and 6.0 Milestone 3.
Apache Harmony is the Java runtime project of the Apache Software
Foundation.
These new Apache Harmony milestones contain a number of important
fixes and enhancements
On 08/Sep/2010 14:10, Mark Hindess wrote:
In message 4c877e2d.80...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes:
On 07/Sep/2010 09:31, Mark Hindess wrote:
I've run tests on freebsd 8.0 x86 and x86_64 for the latest
milestone release and placed them at:
http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/testing/5.0M15
On 13/Sep/2010 08:09, Mark Hindess wrote:
+1 votes from Cath, Oliver, Tim, Prashanth, and myself.
Thanks for voting (and to Sebb for his comments).
The java6 tree is now open for commits again.
I have uploaded binaries created from the signed sources to the
same location:
On 14/Sep/2010 11:10, Mark Hindess wrote:
In message 4c8f43fd.7060...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes:
On 13/Sep/2010 08:09, Mark Hindess wrote:
+1 votes from Cath, Oliver, Tim, Prashanth, and myself.
Thanks for voting (and to Sebb for his comments).
The java6 tree is now open for commits
On 14/Sep/2010 15:46, Mark Hindess wrote:
In message 4c8f8833.5020...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes:
On 14/Sep/2010 11:10, Mark Hindess wrote:
In message 4c8f43fd.7060...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes:
On 13/Sep/2010 08:09, Mark Hindess wrote:
+1 votes from Cath, Oliver, Tim, Prashanth
On 14/Sep/2010 16:39, Robert Muir wrote:
To what extent is the project interested in non-bug differences from RI?
All are interesting, either as differences we will fix, or as
documentation of decisions not to fix.
For example, in Lucene we have a test that invokes Character.codePointAt()
and
Our regular ASF Board report is now due. As before, if there is
anything you want raised with the Directors please add a line to the
wiki placeholder [1] or post a reply here.
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Board201009
Regards,
Tim
On 09/Sep/2010 15:01, Mark Hindess wrote:
+1 votes from Oliver, Sian, Tim, Cath, Prashanth, and myself.
Thanks for voting (and to Sebb for his comments).
The federated build trunk is now open for commits again *but* the java6
branch will remain frozen until the 6.0M3 vote is concluded.
On 10 September 2010 20:04, Prashanth K S prashanth.jayash...@gmail.com wrote:
Downloaded the src and built it on Windows x86 - No build issues. The test
failures are as listed below. Its quite big for the RI. I guess the awt and
the swing components can be exempted, as per the discussion for
+1 based on my testing on WinXPSP3/IA32/MSVC2003+MSVC2008
Regards,
Tim
On 08/Sep/2010 08:52, Mark Hindess wrote:
I have created signed source archives for revision r991881 of trunk and
made them available at:
http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/milestones/6.0M3/
Please test these
On 08/Sep/2010 19:30, Prashanth K S wrote:
Removed DRL build output due to size constraints.
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Prashanth K S* prashanth.jayash...@gmail.com
mailto:prashanth.jayash...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: [vote] Declare
On 08/Sep/2010 10:31, sebb wrote:
On 8 September 2010 08:52, Mark Hindess mark.hind...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have created signed source archives for revision r991881 of trunk and
made them available at:
http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/milestones/6.0M3/
The signing key has RSA key ID
I'm +1 for the .tar file[1][2] too. Tested on Linux2.6/Dual Xeon.
Regards,
Tim
[1]
http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/milestones/5.0M15/apache-harmony-5.0-src-r991518-snapshot.tar.gz
[2] MD5 fc346e1189918a95c6864d3689644a50
On 07/Sep/2010 10:40, Tim Ellison wrote:
I'm voting +1 to the .zip
On 08/Sep/2010 12:53, sebb wrote:
On 8 September 2010 12:35, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/Sep/2010 10:31, sebb wrote:
On 8 September 2010 08:52, Mark Hindess mark.hind...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have created signed source archives for revision r991881 of trunk and
made them
On 07/Sep/2010 09:31, Mark Hindess wrote:
I've run tests on freebsd 8.0 x86 and x86_64 for the latest milestone
release and placed them at:
http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/testing/5.0M15/freebsd.x86/html/
http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/testing/5.0M15/freebsd.x86_64/html/
The
I'm voting +1 to the .zip file [1] [2] which I have checked.
Checksums are ok
Sig is ok -- (but Mark's key really needs cross signing
with a few ASF trusted parties)
License + notice is ok
Compiled and runs tests ok on WinXPSP3/IA32/MSVC2003 and MSVC2008
there is one additional
Thanks for the explanation Garrett. I have some further
questions/comments below.
On 07/Sep/2010 16:17, Garrett Serack wrote:
Howdy,
I can help out a bit here.
What you are seeing is the Windows Side-by-side technology at work
here... Unfortunately, the VC team didn't really use WinSxS
On 03/Sep/2010 23:45, Mark Hindess wrote:
In message 4c80fe64.6030...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes:
I am likely to end up producing at least some of the linux artifacts so
I am happy to produce them all (nicluding windows) and start the vote if
you want.
Sure, thanks. Let me know when you
There are 13 JIRAs listed as fix for the next milestone, but I don't
see any that are blockers for us publishing.
HARMONY-6638[classlib][nio]Some Selector behavior fixed.
HARMONY-6620[jdktools] Unit tests to test the functionality of the
javac/javaw binaries
HARMONY-6608
On 03/Sep/2010 13:02, Christian Peter wrote:
Am Freitag, den 03.09.2010, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Tim Ellison:
There are 13 JIRAs listed as fix for the next milestone, but I don't
see any that are blockers for us publishing.
HARMONY-6638 [classlib][nio]Some Selector behavior fixed.
HARMONY-6620
I see good test results on the Java 5 branch on a WinXP/IA32 MSVS2003
platform too. No new failures.
Is anyone else still running tests? I'd like to start a vote soon and
reopen the code for development.
Regards,
Tim
On 03/Sep/2010 09:21, Catherine Hope wrote:
I get the same 2 permanent
On 01/Sep/2010 18:39, Mark Hindess wrote:
In message aanlkti==alqfnzr8ffwvnuq0=3zagvk7bo83vimvm...@mail.gmail.com,
Catherine Hope writes:
I also see the failures in the javac tests, simply running:
target/hdk/jdk/bin/javac HelloWorld.java
shows the exception:
Uncaught exception in main:
On 02/Sep/2010 11:21, Mark Hindess wrote:
In message 4c7f538a.3060...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes:
On 01/Sep/2010 18:39, Mark Hindess wrote:
In message aanlkti==alqfnzr8ffwvnuq0=3zagvk7bo83vimvm...@mail.gmail.com,
Catherine Hope writes:
I also see the failures in the javac tests, simply
Robert, just to acknowledge that we got the ACQ ok. We re in a code
freeze at the moment pending the next milestone, so your patch will have
to wait for (likely) next week.
You can open a JIRA and attach the patch, or rely on somebody
remembering it is on this list :-)
Regards,
Tim
On
I see a test failure in the Java 6 branch caused by my commit to match
the RI behavior,
Index: PriorityQueue.java
===
--- PriorityQueue.java (revision 967015)
+++ PriorityQueue.java (revision 967016)
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@
On 01/Sep/2010 11:53, Mark Hindess wrote:
In message 4c77985a.8090...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes:
On 24/Aug/2010 16:46, Sian January wrote:
On 19 August 2010 03:29, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/Aug/2010 08:51, Sian January wrote:
I've just run the federated build from
Just an update on my testing the Java 6 branch on a Win32/IA32...
I'm excluding the jdwp tests, because they hang for me part way through.
Beyond that, not looking too bad. Of the 27,537 JUnit tests reported
(a) Two Swing failures (old favorites)
BoxLayoutTest#testLayoutContainerVertical
I'm trying to run through all the tests ahead of the milestone, but
getting hangs on jdwp tests that are apparently waiting for connections.
Shouldn't they time out after a period? otherwise I have to kill ant and
lose the run.
e.g.
[junit] Run:
On 28/Aug/2010 17:35, Oliver Deakin wrote:
On 28/08/2010 17:27, Apache Hudson Server wrote:
SNIP
gen-report:
[echo] The test report is
inhttps://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Harmony-1.5-head-linux-x86_64-full-tests/ws/harmony/target/test_report/html/index.html
I keep trying to
,
Tim
On 18/Aug/2010 10:30, Tim Ellison wrote:
We've had lots of good fixes and improvements in the codebase over the
last few months, so time to take stock with another of our regular
milestones.
I would like to propose the following schedule for 5.0M15 6.0M3.
Feature freeze Fri 20th
On 24/Aug/2010 16:46, Sian January wrote:
On 19 August 2010 03:29, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/Aug/2010 08:51, Sian January wrote:
I've just run the federated build from scratch and it all went
smoothly except that I had to change the sourceforge mirror in all
On 19/Aug/2010 14:29, Mark Hindess wrote:
In message 4c6c943c.8030...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes:
On 18/Aug/2010 21:07, Mark Hindess wrote:
In message 4c6ba84a.3010...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes:
We've had lots of good fixes and improvements in the codebase over the
last few months, so
We've had lots of good fixes and improvements in the codebase over the
last few months, so time to take stock with another of our regular
milestones.
I would like to propose the following schedule for 5.0M15 6.0M3.
Feature freeze Fri 20th August
Code freeze Fri 27th August
Publish
On 19/Aug/2010 01:25, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
So, why nobody did yet do it?
I posted a similar question in the Android discuss list, but nobody
replied.
I'm reluctant to speculate when they chose not to answer for
themselves.
However, if you look at the manifest for the print.jar you
On 18/Aug/2010 21:07, Mark Hindess wrote:
In message 4c6ba84a.3010...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes:
We've had lots of good fixes and improvements in the codebase over the
last few months, so time to take stock with another of our regular
milestones.
I would like to propose the following
1 - 100 of 1794 matches
Mail list logo
