On 29/10/2011 15:59, Gregory Shimansky wrote: > В Сбт, 29/10/2011 в 15:55 +0200, Christian Grobmeier пишет: > >> Hello, >> >> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote: >>> Am 29.10.2011 14:53, schrieb Tim Ellison: >>>> On 29/10/2011 10:13, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>>>> Sounds right... Too sad to see this happening. >>>>> Will the code remain in an svn repo? I don't see much in the attic svn >>>>> repo. >>>> >>>> The process is described here [1]. The Harmony SVN will be marked >>>> read-only, so anyone can still obtain the code to use under the usual >>>> Apache terms. We would not allow any commits as that requires an active >>>> PMC to provide the oversight of the incoming changes. >>>> >>>> [1] http://attic.apache.org/process >>> >>> are there still people willing to commit to the project? >> >> It doesn't seem so: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/harmony/?root=Apache-SVN >> >> last commit ist 3 month old. >> >> Its a shame this project goes to the attic. I would prefer to see >> Harmony become an alternative to Java. But as long as there are no >> people showing interest in doing so, the attic is its place. > > I wonder if anyone contacted Oracle about JCK after Sun was acquired by > them. Absence of JCK was the main reason why Harmony lost its support > IMHO.
I'm surprised you missed the reporting, and subsequent Apache withdrawal from the JCP etc. For example, see http://markmail.org/message/rqyg4sdybsd35xgg https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/search?q=harmony http://apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2010/board_minutes_2010_10_20.txt and various press articles. Regards, Tim >> Attic projects can have a revival, if things change. >> >> Cheers > > >
