Hi,
For upcoming Apache James 3.0, we have a call for a new logo at
http://james.apache.org/#logo
We already have a few proposals, and the call is still ongoing. We will
open the vote to everyone when james 3.0-final will be released, but I
expect some discussions on the choice, and maybe
See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.90/286/
--
[...truncated 1195 lines...]
Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.TestZooKeeperMainServerArg
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.026 sec
Running
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/2170/
--
[...truncated 1596 lines...]
Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.filter.TestSingleColumnValueExcludeFilter
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.113 sec
Running
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/2171/changes
Changes:
[tedyu] HBASE-4310 Fix check for lower and upper bounds
--
[...truncated 1585 lines...]
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.06 sec
Running
See here for the incubator proposal:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AccumuloProposal
Reactions probably better belong over on the incubator mailing list
but I thought a discussion here first might be useful developing a
stance.
Initial reaction, not having seen the code, is that it seems to be
They apparently have a very strong relationship with HBase...;-)
Apache Brand
Our interest in releasing this code as an Apache incubator project is due
to its
strong relationship with other Apache projects, i.e. Hadoop, Zookeeper,
and HBase.
It's disappointing that these guys watched
Some comments on the proposal and differentiation vs HBase:
Access Labels:
The proposal claims that this is unlikely to be adopted [in HBase]. This
is completely untrue. This has been discussed many times in the past in
relation to our security implementation. It's just been deferred at the
I plan to commit the patch for refactoring RegionObserver coprocessor hooks
at the end of day today:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1686/
If anyone wants to comment, please do so before then. (Nicolas, I'm looking
at you!)
--gh
To add to what Todd said, I actually worked with those guys for the
last 3 years and have used Accumulo in production. It's true that it
would have been better if they had been able to contribute to HBase
rather than go on their own, but it's not easy to contribute to open
source, either
It's not really easier, they've been working on getting this released
for 2.5 years or more. What I think will make it easier is having more
of a precedence. In the government, it's always easier to say no than
yes. Showing that it can be done and done successfully will push them
to develop a
I've been in touch with this team for the last 18 months or so.
They're good people, smart, and have a healthy respect for HBase and
our team. Though they haven't contributed code or participated on the
lists, I can vouch that they do follow our development and generally
do understand HBase
On Friday, September 2, 2011, Gary Helmling ghelml...@gmail.com wrote:
Claims a relationship with HBase. Is there overlapping code or is this
just
the duplication of functionality? There's no community relationship that
I'm aware of. I haven't seen any of the proposed committers on the
Maybe a BOF at Hadoop World could clarify some things, provided some
of those folks attend the conference.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 22:01, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Friday, September 2, 2011, Gary Helmling ghelml...@gmail.com wrote:
Claims a relationship with
Just for conversation, if somebody approached ASF incubator with an idea
for a framework called ExtendedSleep that claimed to be a Java
relational-object mapping framework (instead of the crusty
object-relational approach that the Hibernate mapping framework provides),
would anybody take it
Perhaps this feature was discussed before. we currently don't have the full
transition history of all regions { fromState, ToState, the machine that
initiates it }; the states will be removed from zookeeper /hbase/unassigned
once the region is assigned; also .META. table has max version of 10
I think there is precedence for competing and/or duplicate Apache
projects, Avro/Thrift and HBase/Cassandra come to mind.
That argument isn't helping you make your case.
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via
Tom White)
I'm simply pointing out a lack of community involvement to date.
I would only add to this that the incubation proposal makes a controversial
statement regarding existing involvement with the HBase community. It may be
technically true if a certain company with involvement in HBase has also
I'm pissed off my tax dollars were being used to duplicate the effort
we expend each day up here in hbaselandia!
Some one of us needs to bottle some of the above as a response over in
incubator.
My thought is that we'd be doing all involved a service getting them
to tighten up the proposal.
I'd
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/2175/changes
Changes:
[nspiegelberg] HBASE-1730 Online schema changes for HBase
--
[...truncated 1559 lines...]
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.113 sec
Running
19 matches
Mail list logo
