[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15515) Improve LocalityBasedCandidateGenerator in Balancer

2016-03-21 Thread Guanghao Zhang (JIRA)
Guanghao Zhang created HBASE-15515: -- Summary: Improve LocalityBasedCandidateGenerator in Balancer Key: HBASE-15515 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15515 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15514) Single (or small number) of Column Family in Mutation optimization

2016-03-21 Thread Vladimir Rodionov (JIRA)
Vladimir Rodionov created HBASE-15514: - Summary: Single (or small number) of Column Family in Mutation optimization Key: HBASE-15514 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15514

Re: Branch for 1.3

2016-03-21 Thread 张铎
At least include HBASE-15400 in 1.3 please... Otherwise these things can only be integrated in 1.4 since DTCP can not be used together with DefaultStoreEngine after HBASE-15400 getting in. 2016-03-22 2:03 GMT+08:00 Enis Söztutar : > You may want to track

[jira] [Reopened] (HBASE-15360) Fix flaky TestSimpleRpcScheduler

2016-03-21 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu reopened HBASE-15360: > Fix flaky TestSimpleRpcScheduler > > > Key: HBASE-15360 >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15513) hbase.hregion.memstore.chunkpool.maxsize is 0.0 by default

2016-03-21 Thread Vladimir Rodionov (JIRA)
Vladimir Rodionov created HBASE-15513: - Summary: hbase.hregion.memstore.chunkpool.maxsize is 0.0 by default Key: HBASE-15513 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15513 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15512) Avoid cell allocation on Store.add(Cell)

2016-03-21 Thread Vladimir Rodionov (JIRA)
Vladimir Rodionov created HBASE-15512: - Summary: Avoid cell allocation on Store.add(Cell) Key: HBASE-15512 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15512 Project: HBase Issue

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15511) ClusterStatus should be able

2016-03-21 Thread Esteban Gutierrez (JIRA)
Esteban Gutierrez created HBASE-15511: - Summary: ClusterStatus should be able Key: HBASE-15511 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15511 Project: HBase Issue Type:

Re: [NOTICE] defunct branch clean up

2016-03-21 Thread Ted Yu
bq. the branch "hbase-6721" is not related to the actual patch(es) In that case, it is Okay to drop this branch. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > We should not accumulate feature branches indefinitely as it makes the repo > increasingly unwieldy. > >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15510) Reuse buffer inside RpcServer$Connection.readAndProcess

2016-03-21 Thread Vladimir Rodionov (JIRA)
Vladimir Rodionov created HBASE-15510: - Summary: Reuse buffer inside RpcServer$Connection.readAndProcess Key: HBASE-15510 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15510 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15509) Avoid copy of block data in HFileBlock$Writer.finishBlock

2016-03-21 Thread Vladimir Rodionov (JIRA)
Vladimir Rodionov created HBASE-15509: - Summary: Avoid copy of block data in HFileBlock$Writer.finishBlock Key: HBASE-15509 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15509 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15508) Add command for exporting snapshot in hbase command script

2016-03-21 Thread Yufeng Jiang (JIRA)
Yufeng Jiang created HBASE-15508: Summary: Add command for exporting snapshot in hbase command script Key: HBASE-15508 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15508 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15507) Online modification of enabled ReplicationPeerConfig

2016-03-21 Thread Geoffrey Jacoby (JIRA)
Geoffrey Jacoby created HBASE-15507: --- Summary: Online modification of enabled ReplicationPeerConfig Key: HBASE-15507 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15507 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15506) FSDataOutputStream.write() allocates new byte buffer on each operation

2016-03-21 Thread Vladimir Rodionov (JIRA)
Vladimir Rodionov created HBASE-15506: - Summary: FSDataOutputStream.write() allocates new byte buffer on each operation Key: HBASE-15506 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15506

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15505) ReplicationPeerConfig should be builder-style

2016-03-21 Thread Enis Soztutar (JIRA)
Enis Soztutar created HBASE-15505: - Summary: ReplicationPeerConfig should be builder-style Key: HBASE-15505 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15505 Project: HBase Issue Type:

Re: [DISCUSS] Backporting Regionserver Groups (HBASE-6721) to 1.x and 0.98

2016-03-21 Thread Ted Yu
bq. we instead focus on a releasable master +1 One of the hurdles to the above is that some unit tests in master are more flaky compared to their counterparts in branch-1. Smoothing out the flaky tests is non-trivial effort. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Gary Helmling

Re: Branch for 1.3

2016-03-21 Thread Sean Busbey
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Mikhail Antonov wrote: > At this point branch-1.3 is very close (if different from at all) to > branch-1, so that's probably the same discussion. > > Fair enough. Is the previous discussion and documented gates (along with Andrew's assertion

Re: [DISCUSS] Backporting Regionserver Groups (HBASE-6721) to 1.x and 0.98

2016-03-21 Thread Gary Helmling
> > Tho based on this discussion there's a bunch of good features that users > want that won't fit the criteria for #1 and #2. So allowing a backport of > the few that can fit into the criteria shouldn't significantly affect > future release from trunk. This way we can have some progress on some >

Re: Branch for 1.3

2016-03-21 Thread Andrew Purtell
FWIW, I'd like to see the Spark connector get in. We have users who will be interested in it. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Mikhail Antonov wrote: > At this point branch-1.3 is very close (if different from at all) to > branch-1, so that's probably the same discussion.

Re: Branch for 1.3

2016-03-21 Thread Mikhail Antonov
At this point branch-1.3 is very close (if different from at all) to branch-1, so that's probably the same discussion. -Mikhail On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > Is the spark connector thread specifically about 1.3? or branch-1? because > we already

Re: [NOTICE] defunct branch clean up

2016-03-21 Thread Sean Busbey
We should not accumulate feature branches indefinitely as it makes the repo increasingly unwieldy. AFAICT, the branch "hbase-6721" is not related to the actual patch(es) that went in to master for the HBASE-6721 implementation. It will not help with an accurate backport. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15504) Fix Balancer in 1.3 not moving regions off overloaded regionserver

2016-03-21 Thread Elliott Clark (JIRA)
Elliott Clark created HBASE-15504: - Summary: Fix Balancer in 1.3 not moving regions off overloaded regionserver Key: HBASE-15504 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15504 Project: HBase

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-15502) Skeleton unit test to copy/paste

2016-03-21 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-15502. --- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 Thanks [~misty] Pushed...to master

Re: Branch for 1.3

2016-03-21 Thread Sean Busbey
Is the spark connector thread specifically about 1.3? or branch-1? because we already had the branch-1 conversation. the specific gates were tracked in the umbrella jira. -Sean On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Mikhail Antonov wrote: > Yeah, we probably should start

Re: Branch for 1.3

2016-03-21 Thread Mikhail Antonov
Yeah, we probably should start discussion thread about Spark connector. Anyone wants to start the thread and push it forward? Regarding date-tiered compactions - since first impl already went in 1.3, would be good to get any possible improvements in 1.3 as well, as long as they are stable, IMO.

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15503) Document REST endpoints for namespaces

2016-03-21 Thread Misty Stanley-Jones (JIRA)
Misty Stanley-Jones created HBASE-15503: --- Summary: Document REST endpoints for namespaces Key: HBASE-15503 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15503 Project: HBase Issue

Re: [DISCUSS] Backporting Regionserver Groups (HBASE-6721) to 1.x and 0.98

2016-03-21 Thread Francis Liu
I see, that is indeed undesirable.  Tho based on this discussion there's a bunch of good features that users want that won't fit the criteria for #1 and #2. So allowing a backport of the few that can fit into the criteria shouldn't significantly affect future release from trunk. This way we can

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15502) Skeleton unit test to copy/paste

2016-03-21 Thread stack (JIRA)
stack created HBASE-15502: - Summary: Skeleton unit test to copy/paste Key: HBASE-15502 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15502 Project: HBase Issue Type: Task Components:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15501) MultiAction.add creates unnecessary temporary objects

2016-03-21 Thread Vladimir Rodionov (JIRA)
Vladimir Rodionov created HBASE-15501: - Summary: MultiAction.add creates unnecessary temporary objects Key: HBASE-15501 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15501 Project: HBase

Re: [NOTICE] defunct branch clean up

2016-03-21 Thread Ted Yu
For HBASE-6721, is there definitive decision not to backport to branch-1 ? If not, keeping history for its branch is very helpful for backport. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > What is our policy for deleting feature branches? For example, HBASE-10070,

Re: [NOTICE] defunct branch clean up

2016-03-21 Thread Enis Söztutar
What is our policy for deleting feature branches? For example, HBASE-10070, HBASE-6721, etc are all committed, so we do not need the branches. We should only keep them around if we think that keeping history is important (which I am not so sure). Enis On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Sean

Re: Branch for 1.3

2016-03-21 Thread Enis Söztutar
You may want to track https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15339 as a parent for date-tiered compaction improvements. Current compaction policy is useful in its own, but handling existing data, bulk loading etc will be improved with these subtasks. I think the patches can land before the

[NOTICE] defunct branch clean up

2016-03-21 Thread Sean Busbey
I'd like to clean out some of our defunct git branches. The current list I'm proposing is in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15006 If you have a branch you're keeping around and haven't touched in some time, please take a look and make sure I'm not including it. Similarly,

Re: [DISCUSS] Backporting Regionserver Groups (HBASE-6721) to 1.x and 0.98

2016-03-21 Thread Sean Busbey
Hadoop's trunk branch hasn't had a release in a very very long time. So it continues to accumulate changes that aren't in a release while folks drive their particular desired features back into branch-2. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Francis Liu wrote: > To summarize so

Re: [DISCUSS] Backporting Regionserver Groups (HBASE-6721) to 1.x and 0.98

2016-03-21 Thread Francis Liu
To summarize so far it seems the concerns for backporting are: 1. compatibility - api, wire, rolling upgradeabability2. stability - destabilizing code and deploys for those that don't want the new feature Is there anything else?  Elliot what happened to hadoop? Is it neither of the two? Francis

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15500) Cut HBase 1.2.1 release

2016-03-21 Thread Sean Busbey (JIRA)
Sean Busbey created HBASE-15500: --- Summary: Cut HBase 1.2.1 release Key: HBASE-15500 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15500 Project: HBase Issue Type: Task Components:

Successful: HBase Generate Website

2016-03-21 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build status: Successful If successful, the website and docs have been generated. If failed, skip to the bottom of this email. Use the following commands to download the patch and apply it to a clean branch based on origin/asf-site. If you prefer to keep the hbase-site repo around

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15499) Add multiple data type support for increment

2016-03-21 Thread He Liangliang (JIRA)
He Liangliang created HBASE-15499: - Summary: Add multiple data type support for increment Key: HBASE-15499 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15499 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-11684) HBase replicationSource should support multithread to ship the log entry

2016-03-21 Thread Ashish Singhi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Singhi resolved HBASE-11684. --- Resolution: Duplicate Assignee: (was: Tianying Chang) Duplicate of HBASE-12988 >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-15496) Throw RowTooBigException only for user scan/get

2016-03-21 Thread Guanghao Zhang (JIRA)
Guanghao Zhang created HBASE-15496: -- Summary: Throw RowTooBigException only for user scan/get Key: HBASE-15496 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15496 Project: HBase Issue

Re: Branch for 1.3

2016-03-21 Thread Ted Yu
For Spark connector, we should start a separate discussion thread about backporting to branch-1. Zhan has a bug fix coming this week which deals with how negative numbers are handled in comparison. FYI On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Mikhail Antonov wrote: > Hi folks, >

Re: Branch for 1.3

2016-03-21 Thread Mikhail Antonov
Hi folks, bringing this topic up again. I'm planning to start spinning 1.3 builds and see if/where they break in a week or two, and (depending on how it does) start preparing RCs in a month or maybe two. So, let's see where we are. Big items first. There were long debates around three big items