Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Stack wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Ted Yu wrote: >> bq. Can we not disable tests that we've labelled flakey and not issues in >> hbase? >> >> No tests were disabled this past week. >> > > ? Because 0.92 branch had no flakey tests this week? > > The

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > bq. Can we not disable tests that we've labelled flakey and not issues in > hbase? > > No tests were disabled this past week. > ? Because 0.92 branch had no flakey tests this week? The last two builds of 0.92 succeeded as did my most recent loca

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

bq. Can we not disable tests that we've labelled flakey and not issues in hbase? No tests were disabled this past week. I will continue to work on finding root cause for flay tests, with the help from people which related JIRAs are assigned to. Cheers On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Stack wr

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Thanks for the response Dave. > > I exchanged a few emails with Lars H last night and we felt we shouldn't > block 0.92.2 / 0.94.2 releases due to a few flaky tests. > > Let's fix flaky tests continuously. > That seems basically fine except I'd thi

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

Thanks for the response Dave. I exchanged a few emails with Lars H last night and we felt we shouldn't block 0.92.2 / 0.94.2 releases due to a few flaky tests. Let's fix flaky tests continuously. On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Dave Wang wrote: > +1 on limiting changes into 0.92. Just wanted

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

+1 on limiting changes into 0.92. Just wanted to point out a patch that we may be able to pull part of to fix the test. - Dave On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > Looking at 5992.v11.patch, it is quite big, touching master, > AssignmentManager, etc. > > At this moment, I want to l

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

5992.v11.patch couldn't be cleanly applied to 0.92 I got: ./src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/AssignmentManager.java.rej ./src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/handler/ServerShutdownHandler.java.rej ./src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/HMaster.java.rej ./src/main/java/

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

Well, if I remember well the test was flaky because of multiple bugs on draining servers management... (cf. the mail on test speed :-) ) On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > Looking at 5992.v11.patch, it is quite big, touching master, > AssignmentManager, etc. > > At this moment, I

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

Looking at 5992.v11.patch, it is quite big, touching master, AssignmentManager, etc. At this moment, I want to limit the scope of changes going into 0.92 branch. Cheers On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Dave Wang wrote: > Does HBASE-5992 fix this? That fix is only in trunk right now. > > - Dav

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

Does HBASE-5992 fix this? That fix is only in trunk right now. - Dave On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > Looking at TestDrainingServer failure: > > admin.enableTable(TABLENAME); > // Assert that every regionserver has some regions on it. > MiniHBaseCluster cluster = T

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

Looking at TestDrainingServer failure: admin.enableTable(TABLENAME); // Assert that every regionserver has some regions on it. MiniHBaseCluster cluster = TEST_UTIL.getMiniHBaseCluster(); for (int i = 0; i < cluster.getRegionServerThreads().size(); i++) { HRegionServer hrs = c

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > According to: > https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-0.92/519/testReport/junit/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver/TestSplitTransactionOnCluster/testSplitBeforeSettingSplittingInZK/ > > The test failure was due to: > > java.lang

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

According to: https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-0.92/519/testReport/junit/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver/TestSplitTransactionOnCluster/testSplitBeforeSettingSplittingInZK/ The test failure was due to: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/hud

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

About test failures, I saw the following in https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.92-securitybuild 118: Failed tests: queueFailover(org.apache. hadoop.hbase.replication.TestReplication): Waited too much time for

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

I have filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6660 . Sorry for spoiling the party :( On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Stack wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Dave Wang wrote: > > I believe this would be solved by a backport of HBASE-6211 into 0.92.x. > > > > I did the backp

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Dave Wang wrote: > I believe this would be solved by a backport of HBASE-6211 into 0.92.x. > I did the backport David but the little test program in HBASE-6211 still throws the ERROR loggings. Elliott is taking a look. St.Ack

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Devaraj Das wrote: > What's the log splitting one? > I am looking at the replication one .. if anyone else (including you, Stack) > is willing to look at it, welcome.. > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestSplitTransactionOnCluster.testSplitBeforeSettingSpli

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

What's the log splitting one? I am looking at the replication one .. if anyone else (including you, Stack) is willing to look at it, welcome.. On Aug 24, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Stack wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Devaraj Das wrote: >> I'll take a look at the flaky tests. I'll post upd

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > Notice how region server was stuck in a loop of NPE (grep > processBatchCallback). > There is one more NPE related to zookeeper constructor. > > JD was there at irc channel and he thought it could be regression. > FIle a blocker Shrijeet

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

Finally I should add , going back to 0.92.1 got cluster back on feet. It does not prove anything though, I might've got lucky! On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > Sorry sent too early by mistake. > Continuing.. > > I upgraded three data centers to our own checkout of 0.92.

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

Sorry sent too early by mistake. Continuing.. I upgraded three data centers to our own checkout of 0.92.2. Two went fine, upgrade to one data center failed. Failed in the sense that ROOT and META assignment took unusually long. Panic struck I restarted master and all region servers and managed to

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

Hi, I wanted to report one more issue. Recently I upgraded three data centers to our own checkout of 0.92.2, last commit : commit 5accb6a1be4776630126ac21d07adb652b74df95 Author: Zhihong Yu Date: Mon Aug 20 18:19:45 2012 + 24 HBASE-6608 Fix for HBASE-6160, META entries

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

I believe this would be solved by a backport of HBASE-6211 into 0.92.x. - Dave On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Stack wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Shrijeet Paliwal > wrote: > > 0.92.2 has following error messages in region server logs (while it is > > initializing RegionServerMe

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > 0.92.2 has following error messages in region server logs (while it is > initializing RegionServerMetrics). Some one reported it here > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6514 . > > 1591 2012-08-22 20:08:28,106 ERROR org.apache.

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

0.92.2 has following error messages in region server logs (while it is initializing RegionServerMetrics). Some one reported it here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6514 . 1591 2012-08-22 20:08:28,106 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.metrics.MetricsUtil: unknown metrics type: org.apache.hadoop.

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Devaraj Das wrote: > I'll take a look at the flaky tests. I'll post updates. I think we're making pretty good progress on the flakeys. There is still a log splitting and replication test that we could nail and then I'd say we should cut the RC. St.Ack

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

On Aug 17, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Stack wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Shrijeet Paliwal > wrote: >> Hi Stack , >> Should I hold my breath ? Let me know if you need a hand. Looking >> forward towards 0.92.2 RC. >> > > > We have a couple of flakey tests. See > https://builds.apache.org

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > Hi Stack , > Should I hold my breath ? Let me know if you need a hand. Looking > forward towards 0.92.2 RC. > We have a couple of flakey tests. See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.92/. They fail the odd time. Should I put up an

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

Hi Stack , Should I hold my breath ? Let me know if you need a hand. Looking forward towards 0.92.2 RC. -Shrijeet On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Stack wrote: > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Devaraj Das wrote: >> Thanks, Stack. I can spend some time in the testing of the RC. >> > > FYI, I'm

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Devaraj Das wrote: > Thanks, Stack. I can spend some time in the testing of the RC. > FYI, I'm running builds up on jenkins of current 0.92 trunk. I'm finding a few tests are flakey. Looking into it. Will cut an RC after I get things to settle some. St.Ack

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

Thanks, Stack. I can spend some time in the testing of the RC. Devaraj. On Aug 7, 2012, at 12:23 AM, Stack wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Devaraj Das wrote: >> Folks, since the last release from the 0.92 branch, there have been quite a >> few fixes (131) on the branch. Should we cons

Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Devaraj Das wrote: > Folks, since the last release from the 0.92 branch, there have been quite a > few fixes (131) on the branch. Should we consider making a 0.92.2 release at > this point? > Yes. I tried to put up an RC a while back. Will have another go at it

[Discuss] Release 0.92.2?

Folks, since the last release from the 0.92 branch, there have been quite a few fixes (131) on the branch. Should we consider making a 0.92.2 release at this point? Thanks, Devaraj.