Thanks for the comment, Stack.
Obviously this didn't happen last week :). I'm going to rebase once more
and run the dev-tests locally and then plan to commit today.
On 5/19/17 3:29 PM, Stack wrote:
Sounds good Josh. Thanks for heads up on when merge happens.
Regards merge before branch for 2
Sounds good Josh. Thanks for heads up on when merge happens.
Regards merge before branch for 2, IIRC, this is pretty well contained so
should not throw-off work like the big patch out on HBASE-14614 branch.
St.Ack
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Calling this VOTE as we hav
Calling this VOTE as we have 3 +1's (myself, Ted, and Enis).
Special thanks to Ted, Enis, and Andrew for their reviews along the way.
You all brought up great improvements that made this a better feature.
On a procedural note, I intend to rebase the changeset once more and
queue up the bits t
Since we're struggling to get votes cast (I can only assume due to lack
of time from individuals since there have been no objections/concerns
raised).
Here's my +1 too
Josh Elser wrote:
Folks,
This is a vote to (rebase and) merge the branch HBASE-16961 into master.
Per the book, this require
Sorry missed the deadline again, but I've spend some time with the patches
today, and I'll cast my vote as +1 for the merge.
This feature is pretty relevant to multi-tenant, bigger clusters, and is a
good complimentary to existing quotas support.
- The code is high quality, readable, pluggable an
As requested (later in this thread), I'll make sure this VOTE stays open
at least until 2017-05-17 (an extra week). If time continues to be a
barrier for review/input, please do speak up.
Josh Elser wrote:
Folks,
This is a vote to (rebase and) merge the branch HBASE-16961 into master.
Per the
I mentioned 2.0 if the thought of merging a major change while trying to
stabilize for branching of branch-2 was causing people to hold off casting
a vote. Maybe that is only a concern of mine.
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> I won't pretend to be involved enough in the 2.0
Right. 17748 is not in the picture right now.
Happy to leave this open for more time if people would like it. Thanks
for taking a look!
Enis Söztutar wrote:
Just to be clear, you are proposing the merge without
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17748 in place, right?
Enis
On Wed,
Just to be clear, you are proposing the merge without
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17748 in place, right?
Enis
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> I was following the patches up to some extend, but I am not up to date on
> the recent stuff. Let me spend some t
I was following the patches up to some extend, but I am not up to date on
the recent stuff. Let me spend some time with the newest code.
I think we can extend the vote to give others some more time as well.
Enis
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> I won't pretend to be involved
I won't pretend to be involved enough in the 2.0 work to give an opinion
:) -- I did say earlier that I'm happy to land this in 2.0 or 3.0
(whatever master decides to be at the time I merge).
If the spirit of the voters is to include this in 3.0 and not 2.0,
that's fine by me. I'm also happy t
Would it help to cut a branch for 2.0 before attempting to merge in a new
major feature?
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Reminder: I hope to close this in ~30hrs and there have been no votes so
> far.
>
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> This is a vote to (rebase and) m
+1 on merging this to master branch.
I have reviewed Josh's work for phase 1.
This is an important addition for multi-tenant deployments.
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This is a vote to (rebase and) merge the branch HBASE-16961 into master.
> Per the book, this
Reminder: I hope to close this in ~30hrs and there have been no votes so
far.
Josh Elser wrote:
Folks,
This is a vote to (rebase and) merge the branch HBASE-16961 into master.
Per the book, this requires 3 binding +1's from other committers to merge.
Relevant info for those who want to revisi
Folks,
This is a vote to (rebase and) merge the branch HBASE-16961 into master.
Per the book, this requires 3 binding +1's from other committers to merge.
Relevant info for those who want to revisit any topics:
DISCUSS on merge[1]
Design Doc[2]
Staged user manual[3]
I'll plan to leave this o
15 matches
Mail list logo
