sebb wrote:
Although prompted by the Windows NTLM issue, I thought this discussion
was about more than just authentication.
For me, this discussion was about opening a can of worms
or steering clear of it.
never mind,
Roland
On 10.03.2008, at 01:17, sebb wrote:
On 09/03/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 18:55 +, sebb wrote:
On 09/03/2008, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Roland
Honestly, I really think this whole native code thing is n
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 00:17 +, sebb wrote:
> On 09/03/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 18:55 +, sebb wrote:
> > > On 09/03/2008, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Roland
> > >
On 09/03/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 18:55 +, sebb wrote:
> > On 09/03/2008, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Roland
> > > > Honestly, I really think this whole native code thing is n
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 18:55 +, sebb wrote:
> On 09/03/2008, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> > >
> > > Roland
> > > Honestly, I really think this whole native code thing is not as bad as
> > > it may seem.
> >
> >
> > It sure makes my spider-sense ting
On 09/03/2008, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> >
> > Roland
> > Honestly, I really think this whole native code thing is not as bad as
> > it may seem.
>
>
> It sure makes my spider-sense tingle like mad.
>
I feel uncomfortable too.
Who is going to build a
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Roland
Honestly, I really think this whole native code thing is not as bad as
it may seem.
It sure makes my spider-sense tingle like mad.
cheers,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 17:36 +0100, Roland Weber wrote:
> Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> >> Who is going to review that code before it gets committed?
> >
> > I can volunteer if needed
>
> OK.
>
> >> Who is going to make sure it doesn't get broken by changes?
> >
> > Whoever makes changes to that
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Who is going to review that code before it gets committed?
I can volunteer if needed
OK.
Who is going to make sure it doesn't get broken by changes?
Whoever makes changes to that code.
So either you are reasonably sure that changes in HttpAuth
will never affect
On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 16:01 +0100, Roland Weber wrote:
> Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> >
> > I _personally_ have no intention of getting into business of writing C
> > code. At the same time I _personally_ have no problem with accepting a
> > well written, documented, self-contained piece of native
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
I _personally_ have no intention of getting into business of writing C
code. At the same time I _personally_ have no problem with accepting a
well written, documented, self-contained piece of native code
implementing a _very specific_ function into the contrib package.
On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 09:26 +0100, Roland Weber wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for the time being, all the code in our repository is
> pure Java and can be built and run on any platform that
> provides a Java implementation at the required level.
> This applies not only to the supported code, but also
> to
Hi all,
for the time being, all the code in our repository is
pure Java and can be built and run on any platform that
provides a Java implementation at the required level.
This applies not only to the supported code, but also
to the contrib code. Even though we don't support that,
we make sure th
13 matches
Mail list logo
