Just out of curiosity, would it be easier if, for 2.0, we fixed the
original bogosity of location walk by running it first, before directory
walk, and simply forbid its use within .htaccess? That would eliminate
most of the issues regarding wasted time spent checking directories for
things that a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> rbb 01/08/26 23:00:51
>
> Modified:.CHANGES
>include util_filter.h
>modules/ssl mod_ssl.c ssl_engine_io.c
>server util_filter.c
util_filter.c
httpd-2.0\server\util_filter.c(205) :
warning C4098:
+1 (on fixing and committing)
Ryan Bloom wrote:
>
>
> I have begun to re-write APXS. The new version of APXS, will use the same
> build system as Apache itself, which should make it a bit more flexible. As of
> right now, we can query build time variables, but building is not working yet.
>
From: "Amit Athavale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:10 AM
> Hello,
> In Win32 environment there are two procees run by apache. One is main proceess
> and other is child one. But this makes debugging difficult. As we start Dev studio
> debugger on main procees.
Unless y
From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 4:04 AM
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 11:43:19PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > wrowe 01/08/25 16:43:19
> >
> > Modified:.CHANGES
> >include http_request.h
> >modules/http
From: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 11:48 AM
> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 11:43:19PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > wrowe 01/08/25 16:43:19
> > >
> > > Modified:.CHANGES
> > >include http_request.h
> > >
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 9:43 PM
> From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 4:04 AM
>
>
> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 11:43:19PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > wrowe 01/08/25 16:43:19
> > >
> > >
Hello,
In Win32 environment there are two procees run by apache. One is main proceess and
other is child one. But this makes debugging difficult. As we start Dev studio
debugger on main procees.
Is there any way to start apache in single process. Other than changing following code
:: static i
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
>
> This will break things. We will no longer be keeping track of the listener, which
> is a bad thing. I will fix this later this weekend, but the worker MPM is broken
> now.
its working for me. was broken before, with this config:
StartServers
On Sunday 26 August 2001 17:20, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 03:18:41PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 August 2001 12:54, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> > > On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Marc Slemko wrote:
> > > > hang on, is this about keepalives or chunked encoding?
> > >
> > > both.
On Sunday 26 August 2001 17:16, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 11:06:55AM -0700, Marc Slemko wrote:
> > On 26 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > wrowe 01/08/25 22:15:09
> > >
> > > Modified:include ap_mmn.h
> > > Log:
> > > That last round calls for a bump.
> >
I probably should have mentioned in the comment that the reason I made
the comment was that it broke when I changed it to 0. :)
And I assume the first question in my comment is true? That is:
"ap_threads_per_child includes the listener thread"
-aaron
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 06:29:49PM -0700, Ry
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 11:43:19PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > wrowe 01/08/25 16:43:19
> >
> > Modified:.CHANGES
> >include http_request.h
> >modules/http http_core.c http_protocol.c http_request.c
> > mod_cor
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 11:43:19PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > wrowe 01/08/25 16:43:19
> >
> > Modified:.CHANGES
> >include http_request.h
> >modules/http http_core.c http_protocol.c http_request.c
> > mod_core
On 26 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> rbb 01/08/25 20:13:36
>
> Modified:server error_bucket.c
> Log:
> We have to initialize the error_bucket before we can destroy it.
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.8 +1 -1 httpd-2.0/server/error_bucket.c
Oops, thanks.
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Sunday 26 August 2001 15:53, Marc Slemko wrote:
> > if I have a CGI that generates less than 8k of output, the content length
> > doesn't get set.
> >
> > If it generates between 8k and 32k or something like that, it does.
> >
> > is this a known bug?
>
On Sunday 26 August 2001 15:53, Marc Slemko wrote:
> if I have a CGI that generates less than 8k of output, the content length
> doesn't get set.
>
> If it generates between 8k and 32k or something like that, it does.
>
> is this a known bug?
Why are you assuming this is a bug? It looks like in
if I have a CGI that generates less than 8k of output, the content length
doesn't get set.
If it generates between 8k and 32k or something like that, it does.
is this a known bug?
On Sunday 26 August 2001 12:54, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Marc Slemko wrote:
> > hang on, is this about keepalives or chunked encoding?
>
> both.
>
> the check always fails because ap_content_length_filter has set content
> length before ap_set_keepalive is called. the right f
you're right, keepalives were working fine without the change. and the
chunked stuff was misunderstanding on my part. sorry for the confusion.
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Marc Slemko wrote:
>
> > hang on, is this about keepalives or chunked encoding?
>
> both.
>
> the check always fails because ap_content_length_filter has set content
> length before ap_set_keepalive is called. the right fix w
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Marc Slemko wrote:
> hang on, is this about keepalives or chunked encoding?
both.
the check always fails because ap_content_length_filter has set content
length before ap_set_keepalive is called. the right fix would probably be
to check http/1.1-oneness eariler and remove
On 26 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dougm 01/08/26 11:57:16
>
> Modified:modules/http http_protocol.c
> Log:
> ap_content_length_filter has already set Content-Length
> before ap_set_keepalive is called. need to remove this check
> in order for keepalives to work.
han
On 26 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> wrowe 01/08/25 22:15:09
>
> Modified:include ap_mmn.h
> Log:
> That last round calls for a bump.
>
> bump.
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.19 +2 -1 httpd-2.0/include/ap_mmn.h
In 1.3, dependencies were generat
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> chunked encoding never gets turned on because by the time
> ap_set_keepalive() is called, ap_content_length_filter has set
> r->headers_out.Content-Length
> with this patch chunked encoding works fine, but i'm not sure if it is
> the correct fix.
So
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Saturday 25 August 2001 20:06, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Actually, they are very different. I don't know which we will endorse.
> > I'd expect performance testing to answer the question...
>
> I only added the AddType stuff back for backwards co
> Hi Sander.
> is it possible to post patches from the most recent CVS version.
> that would make it much easier for people to apply them
Ok, I agree with you on applyability, but for readability that
is quite different. Want me to post some patches against recent
CVS?
> Thanks
> ...Ian
Sander
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 02:32:32PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:00:46PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> >...
> > > > Note that if the last bucket is not eos, depending on how your filter is
> > > > supposed to work that migh
[ moving to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 09:53:51PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Brian Pane wrote:
> > However, it also seems to break something else:
> >
> > With this new code, any POST response that goes through the mod_include
> > filter will result in a 4
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 11:43:19PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> wrowe 01/08/25 16:43:19
>
> Modified:.CHANGES
>include http_request.h
>modules/http http_core.c http_protocol.c http_request.c
> mod_core.h
>
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 12:45:13AM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > don't forget to _permit_ OPTIONS.
>
> It turns out that OPTIONS was more complicated than I expected. By the
> time we get to the includes filter, the default handler has alre
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 07:45:29PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>...
> I've verified this as a security problem in 2.0. 1.3 seems to return a
> 405 Method Not Allowed error when you attempt to POST to a server-parsed
> file, so I've attempted to duplicate that behavior as best I can. Does
> the f
32 matches
Mail list logo
