Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/generators mod_cgi.c mod_cgid.c

On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 21:14:41 -0800, Brian Pane wrote: >Brian Havard wrote: > >>On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 16:14:55 +, Thom May wrote: >> >>>This change appears to have broken some cgÑ scripts - cricket >>> worked fine in 2.0.33 but in 2.0.34 and >>>35-dev: >>> >>>[S

Re: Q: licensing suEXEC modifications under GPL?

On Sun, 31 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > GNU Public License and am writing to ask for permission and advice. > (I am not a lawyer and the gnu.org website indicates that the Apache > Software License v1.1 is not compatible with the GPL, but does not > give specific reasons.) The incompatibi

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/generators mod_cgi.c mod_cgid.c

Brian Havard wrote: >On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 16:14:55 +, Thom May wrote: > >>This change appears to have broken some cgÑ scripts - cricket >> worked fine in 2.0.33 but in 2.0.34 and >>35-dev: >> >>[Sat Mar 30 15:20:03 2002] [error] [client 192.168.0.34] malformed

Q: licensing suEXEC modifications under GPL?

Hi. I sent this over three weeks ago to the human response email address at apache.org (and pinged them again a week ago), but have yet to receive a response. Would someone on his list please direct me to whom I should contact? A synopsis is that I am requesting that Apache release suEXEC under

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/generators mod_cgi.c mod_cgid.c

On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 16:14:55 +, Thom May wrote: >This change appears to have broken some cgÑ scripts - cricket > worked fine in 2.0.33 but in 2.0.34 and >35-dev: > >[Sat Mar 30 15:20:03 2002] [error] [client 192.168.0.34] malformed header >from : /usr/lib/cgi

Re: bucket free list breakage (was Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/workerworker.c)

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > On that note, it sounds like all of the bucket, ssl, proxy and include > changes > work together, and everything is nearly healthy again? If so, I'll > simply push > .34 to head tommorow, incorporating these changes [none appear to be > trouble], and let Greg Ame

Re: bucket free list breakage (was Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/workerworker.c)

On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Any observations before I do so? Are remaining segfaults in includes the > exception [bad script] or of a more general nature? The includes issues are not just on bad scripts, but they're rare. I would like to make sure that the CGI issues som

Re: bucket free list breakage (was Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/workerworker.c)

At 06:23 PM 3/29/2002, you wrote: >On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote: > > > Yes. The SSLProxyEngine on directive is missing from the config file. I > > added it manually and it works. I expect something like this would do the > > trick: > >oh duh, i had made the change but didn't commit.

Re: connect to listener warning message

"David Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > When I run 2.0.32 on Compaq Tru64 and give it a bit of a load (ok, I whack it >good :-), I get warnings similar to the following looping into the error log file. I >am getting one per second, even well after the load is removed.I do not g

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/generators mod_cgi.c mod_cgid.c

Thom May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This change appears to have broken some cgі scripts - cricket > worked fine in 2.0.33 but in 2.0.34 and > 35-dev: > > [Sat Mar 30 15:20:03 2002] [error] [client 192.168.0.34] malformed header > from : /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cric

Re: suexec & ScritpAlias/ScriptAliasMatch

>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: suexec & ScritpAlias/ScriptAliasMatch >Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 12:59:58 -0500 >Received: from [63.251.56.142] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id >MHotMailBE6F4A4F00C54136E84B3FFB388E125B0; Sat, 30 Mar 200

Re: suexec & ScritpAlias/ScriptAliasMatch

> I am just starting to look at the server code and have been playing with the > suexec code. Want to try to pass additional parameters to suexec, in > paticular the value of the ScriptAlias or ScriptAliasMatch (after regex) for > the VirtualHost. Believe I have found where suexec is called but un

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/generators mod_cgi.c mod_cgid.c

This change appears to have broken some cgі scripts - cricket worked fine in 2.0.33 but in 2.0.34 and 35-dev: [Sat Mar 30 15:20:03 2002] [error] [client 192.168.0.34] malformed header from : /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cricket/grapher.cgi Cheers, -Thom * [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: mod_include bug(s)?

Okay, I have found the source of the core dump that I have been experiencing in mod_include. There are actually two problems that are working together to cause this. The first is that the code is too aggressive in getting rid of buckets/brigades during a non-printing state (i.e. a false if/else

suexec & ScritpAlias/ScriptAliasMatch

I hope this is the proper group for this, it was the only one that appears to work with the code. I am just starting to look at the server code and have been playing with the suexec code. Want to try to pass additional parameters to suexec, in paticular the value of the ScriptAlias or ScriptAl

Re: Host: header and proxy

> Some advice needed on how to use the Host header when using a proxy > and confirming its limitations with respect to Host: based proxies. I personally do think reusing Host: header for proxy with name-based virtualhost configuration is a nice tweak in implementation. It seems RFC2616 does not