I noticed that there were some places where u_int32_t is being used instead
of apr_uint32_t. Is it purposefully done OR is it one of those Oh, the apr
interface changed stuff ?.
Anyways, I've included a patch that atleast gets the module to compile
against 2.0.43. Pl. let me know if it's okay.
What about adding the SVG support to mime conf files :
image/svg+xml svg
image/svg+xml svgz
This one should be added to httpd.conf :
AddEncoding gzip svgz
Regards
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
Perhaps I misunderstood. The patch I had developed (which is broken
because of the problems with the accept lock) just didn't listen on the
socket if it has no chance of answering
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as you are doing all this work, there is one more thought that I
have been meaning to implement, but that I never got around to. Currently
perchild doesn't work with SSL, because of when the request is passed off,
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Quoting Brian Pane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As for the MMN bump, IMHO it would be better to code the
patch in a way that doesn't require it (if I remember correctly,
you had an alternate solution involving a module-specific
structure instead of new fields in conn_rec). That
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Behlendorf wrote:
The load average on apache.org spiked into the 300's a couple times this
weekend.
I bet there's some cutoff, maybe it's 800, or 900, where
the # of parallel connections is just too much and something goes
Consider the case where an admin configures the server to listen on
www.foo.com:8080, but he never assigns a child process to listen to that
port. If you just don't accept the connections, the user will hang
forever. If every child process, however, actively closes the sockets
that it
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I was thinking was to add an artificial limitation that you can't
share an IP:port pair across two different uid/gid's since that's the
only case you want to pass a connection.
That limitation should already
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
Ryan, I've CC'd you on this just to let you see the patch. If you don't
want me to involve you in this, please accept my apologies and let me
know and I won't CC you in any further patches.
I have no problem being CC'ed on patches, although for the
As long as you are doing all this work, there is one more thought that I
have been meaning to implement, but that I never got around to. Currently
perchild doesn't work with SSL, because of when the request is passed off,
and how SSL works. The easy solution to this, is to have the
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I was thinking was to add an artificial limitation that you can't
share an IP:port pair across two different uid/gid's since that's the
only case you want to pass a
Thanks Brian. I appreciate your input.
Bojan
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 04:11, Brian Pane wrote:
I'll rework the patch to include the structure structure in core.c rather then
one in mod_logio.c. Does that sound OK?
Sounds good to me
The core would also have to know about logio_config_t,
What about adding the SVG support to mime conf files :
image/svg+xml svg
image/svg+xml svgz
You might want to look at
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12241 :-)
johannes
--
Is sex dirty? Only when it's being done right. -- Woody Allen
- http://jgcl.at/ko/ - new photos
On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 14:24, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Sorry to be a pest (no, not really :-)...
Would this patch have more chance if it didn't involve an MMN bump? If
so, let me know and I'll rework it...
From your description of the patch, I'm +1 on the concept
(though I haven't had time to
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 18:50, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Lukasz Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello everybody,
It's my first deeper contact with apache sources (excluding
./configure; make; make install ;) ).
I am trying to run apache 1.3.27 (with mod_perl and EAPI, but I think it
amit athavale wrote:
I am using Apache 2.0 with prefork MPM. There is some external program which adds
VirtualHosts to httpd.conf dynamically and send SIGUSR1 to a process with pid = {pid
in httpd.pid}. Immediately after this, that external program sends some HTTP request
which should
Quoting Brian Pane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As for the MMN bump, IMHO it would be better to code the
patch in a way that doesn't require it (if I remember correctly,
you had an alternate solution involving a module-specific
structure instead of new fields in conn_rec). That would
make it easier
On 21/10/02 21:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I don't feel brave enough to redirect all of that at once without
knowing what's going on in the xml or jarkarta projects, and without being
able to monitor nagoya very well.
Greg, if you want I can open up you an account...
Quoting Brian Pane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The core would also have to know about logio_config_t, which doesn't also
doesn't make sense. I would rather have it the other way around.
I agree--better to add a struct in the core and make mod_logio
depend on that than to require the core to know
19 matches
Mail list logo
