On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Are ready for testing...
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Looking to announce/release this Friday... We want to move the approved
> tarballs over as soon as feasible to give mirrors time
> to grab 'em.
+1 for release;
tested with httpd-te
Isn't it worth retaining a note that those specific MPM's should not require
the directives to be enabled? No argument that the blocks
were overkill, but some document'ative value lost in this commit.
Bill
At 10:18 AM 7/9/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>fielding2003/07/09 08:18:01
>
> Modi
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/05/29 15:07:11 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related proj
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/07/15 21:41:17 $]
Release:
2.0.48 : in development
2.0.47 : released July 09, 2003 as GA.
2.0.46 : released May 28, 2003 as GA.
2.0.45 : released April 1, 2003 as GA.
2
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/07/16 20:27:07 $]
Release:
1.3.28: Tagged July 16, 2003.
1.3.27: Tagged September 30, 2002. Announced Oct 3, 2002.
1.3.26: Tagged June 18, 2002.
1.3.25: Tagged June 17, 2002. Not
+1 for IBM's TPF.
-David
Jim Jagielski
+1 on NetWare
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:04:42 PM >>>
Are ready for testing...
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Looking to announce/releas
Hi,
Question : Why do we define regoff_t as "typedef int regoff_t" in
srclib/pcre/pcreposix.h ? I expected it to be a 'size_t' instead.
-Madhu
Are ready for testing...
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Looking to announce/release this Friday... We want to move the approved
tarballs over as soon as feasible to give mirrors time
to grab 'em.
I'm still having some weird problems with cvs right now. I don't
want a screwup :)
I'll hold off on a tag until it's stable.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A society t
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Will be done sometime this afternoon (eastern time). Most likely
> 3pm or so.
Assuming cvs is reliable :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A
I have been through the routine of signing off the list yet I am still
receiving messages.
Can somebody please make arrangements to have the messages stopped.
Thanks.
Will be done sometime this afternoon (eastern time). Most likely
3pm or so.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
I turned on SSLVerifyClient and my client wasn't set up properly and I
started getting server segfaults because we try to read on the
connection after some SSL-related data has been cleaned up.
#2 0x8091753 in ssl_io_filter_input (f=0x825d760, bb=0x825f440,
mode=AP_MODE_GETLINE, block=APR_BLOC
Well I would if I could, but it seems that /tmp is full and
cvs activity is failing for me.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Paul J. Reder wrote:
Specifically, my thinking was that *I* wasn't the one who had
initially done the work and felt felt I shouldn't take credit
for anything other than what I did, which
IBM's TPF looks good.
-David
Bill Stoddard
Seems *real* slow... taking me ages to do simple updates.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
wil
Paul J. Reder wrote:
Specifically, my thinking was that *I* wasn't the one who had
initially done the work and felt felt I shouldn't take credit
for anything other than what I did, which was to do a quick
review and then backport it. I did assume that backporting
would imply a review. It was just e
Jim Jagielski wrote:
In anticipation of a "very soon" T&R of 1.3.28, please try
out HEAD. All expected patches have been folded in.
Quick spin on Windows looks good. +1 on release.
Bill
Specifically, my thinking was that *I* wasn't the one who had
initially done the work and felt felt I shouldn't take credit
for anything other than what I did, which was to do a quick
review and then backport it. I did assume that backporting
would imply a review. It was just easier for me to backp
Hi Bill!
I have to thank you and the people who worked in that module for the great
job! I'll wait for the next release!
Just another thing
I was just wondering if there's any effort to create a module that emulate
the behaviour of the ISAPI filter. I had created a simple module, but it's
no
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>All this shows that running UDP in Apache can make sense, and I tried
>>to get some attention about it one year ago.. But somehow everybody
>>thought that UDP inside Apache can be used only for HTTP-over-UDP,
>>which is indeed controversial.. I hope that full UDP-suppo
22 matches
Mail list logo
