Specifically, my thinking was that *I* wasn't the one who had initially done the work and felt felt I shouldn't take credit for anything other than what I did, which was to do a quick review and then backport it. I did assume that backporting would imply a review. It was just easier for me to backport the next patch if this one were done first. It was already voted on, I just backported it.
I'll try to do a better job of dotting all the t's and crossing all the I's next time...
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:18:19PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rederpj 2003/07/15 14:03:10
Modified: . CHANGES
... This should be simply
*) Eliminate creation of a temporary table in ap_get_mime_headers_core() [Joe Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
In the CVS commit message, put "Brian Pane, Paul J. Reder" in the "Reviewed by:" field.
Well, given that Paul committed it, I'd assume the review is implicit :-)
yes, I guess that could be omitted :)
-- Paul J. Reder ----------------------------------------------------------- "The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are the constitutional rights secure." -- Albert Einstein
