I am facing a problem there. When I try to get the HTTP headers, on
Apache2x I am getting both the Default (such as HTTP_COOKIE,
HTTP_CONNECTION) and Custom HTTP headers such as HTTP_FOO. But when I
test the same code on IHS, I see that I am able to only get the default
HTTP headers and
Swapan Gupta wrote:
I am facing a problem there. When I try to get the HTTP headers, on
Apache2x I am getting both the Default (such as HTTP_COOKIE,
HTTP_CONNECTION) and Custom HTTP headers such as HTTP_FOO. But when I
test the same code on IHS, I see that I am able to only get the default
Please find the information inline.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 4:29 PM
To: Swapan Gupta
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem with getting custom HTTP header in IHS 2.42.x
Swapan Gupta wrote:
I am facing a
I've googled and come up empty. This would be a good feature to have for
websites that accept POST requests and have a LimitRequestBody threshold
configured.
Bill
Swapan Gupta wrote:
Please find the information inline.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 4:29 PM
To: Swapan Gupta
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem with getting custom HTTP header in IHS 2.42.x
Swapan Gupta wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
For some reason nobody calls ap_time_process_request, keeping the
scoreboard start/stop times at 0 at all times. Any reason for that?
Performance?
Bill
I'm looking to release 1.3.29 soonish... I think
it's likely a good time to get another release
out.
Fair warning :)
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
For some reason nobody calls ap_time_process_request, keeping the
scoreboard start/stop times at 0 at all times. Any reason for that?
Performance?
Quite likely. I have a vague memory that in 1.3 this was only done if
mod_include was in
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Quite likely. I have a vague memory that in 1.3 this was only done if
mod_include was in extendedstatus on mode. In 2.0 since mod_include is
rather more decoupled, we probably ripped out the lines that set those
without putting in
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
right, so should it be turned on with ExtendedStatus is on? Where was it
called before? cvs change pointer?
That's the whole problem. It used to be that mod_status set some global
variable called ap_extended_status to 1. We got rid of that variable in
I have privately received positive feedback from people using this patch
but have received very little feedback on this list, and none after my
repost on September 4th.
What must I do to get this into Apache 1.3?
If you won't accept it, please let me know what its shortcomings are
so that I may
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:03:37PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm looking to release 1.3.29 soonish... I think
it's likely a good time to get another release
out.
Fair warning :)
-1 (from non-commiter)
unless src/main/alloc.c was modified to better handle process cleanups
when used with
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:41:09AM -0400, Glenn wrote:
With the talk about a minor MMN bump, I put together this patch which
adds a flag at the end of server_rec. This also changes ErrorLog to
a TAKE12, with an optional style of default or vhosts, where the
vhosts includes the server name and
Glenn wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:03:37PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm looking to release 1.3.29 soonish... I think
it's likely a good time to get another release
out.
Fair warning :)
-1 (from non-commiter)
unless src/main/alloc.c was modified to better handle process
Stas Bekman wrote:
But we still have ExtendedStatus which is when on, maintains the client and
request records. If I turn it off, these two records disappear.
Let me try to carve out some time to look into the current comparison
of mod_status for 1.3 vs 2.0... Once we got it to compile
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 06:15:15PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Glenn wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:03:37PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm looking to release 1.3.29 soonish... I think
it's likely a good time to get another release
out.
Fair warning :)
-1 (from
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:52:33PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:41:09AM -0400, Glenn wrote:
Comments appreciated on the method(s) that would most likely get this
accepted into 1.3.28 or 1.3.29. (global flag, server_rec addition,
other ...) Thanks!
In general,
17 matches
Mail list logo