I'd like to get a new A-T out of the door. There were a *lot* of tweaks and
new features added since the last release. It'd be nice to see whether users
are happy with them, before we get a new mp2 release out.
__
Stas Bekman
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'd like to get a new A-T out of the door. There were a *lot* of tweaks and
new features added since the last release. It'd be nice to see whether users
are happy with them, before we get a new mp2 release out.
Hi Stas,
Regarding that patch we just
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'd like to get a new A-T out of the door. There were a *lot* of tweaks and
new features added since the last release. It'd be nice to see whether users
are happy with them, before we get a new mp2 release out.
Hi Stas,
Regarding that
is there really no way to pass additional -D switches to the server? I
can't see any, so unless I'm missing it...
--Geoff
Index: lib/Apache/TestConfig.pm
===
RCS file:
Stas Bekman wrote:
I'd like to get a new A-T out of the door. There were a *lot* of tweaks
and new features added since the last release. It'd be nice to see
whether users are happy with them, before we get a new mp2 release out.
sounds like a plan.
--Geoff
$vars-{proxyssl_url} ||= '';
+$self-{defines} ||= '';
oops, make that $vars :)
--Geoff
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:30:03PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
is there really no way to pass additional -D switches to the server? I
can't see any, so unless I'm missing it...
Ooh, cool, I tried to add that feature earlier in the week too (and
didn't come up with a patch as simple as yours
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:30:03PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
is there really no way to pass additional -D switches to the server? I
can't see any, so unless I'm missing it...
Ooh, cool, I tried to add that feature earlier in the week too (and
didn't come up with a
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 05:55:13PM -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
However I completely disagree that Python (or Perl or PHP) is
a good choice for use in build systems.
As part of the configure process, I would agree with you, but as part
of
buildconf, I disagree--not everyone needs
httpd is still just as buildable on such platforms regardless of
gen-build.py: from the release tarballs. Building from a CVS checkout
cannot be done without extra tools, but that has always been true in
2.0: you need libtool and autoconf (not to mention the CVS client).
Hell, autoconf
A shell script generating build-exports.mk is attached.
The implementation lacks cyclic reference detection (some
header files point to each other). This can be resolved by
splitting the 2-3 header files though.
- Sascha
gen-build.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
Please get your facts straight.
httpd is still just as buildable on such platforms regardless of
gen-build.py: from the release tarballs. Building from a CVS checkout
cannot be done without extra tools, but that has always been true in
2.0: you need libtool and autoconf (not to
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:27:29AM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Please get your facts straight.
httpd is still just as buildable on such platforms regardless of
gen-build.py: from the release tarballs. Building from a CVS checkout
cannot be done without extra tools, but that has
autoconf does not use perl.
It has done since 2.50 AFAIK: from the README in 2.59:
Fortunately, one can choose not to use the horrible autoconf
2.5x. The sane versions up to 2.13 don't require perl for
buildconf'ing APR or httpd.
- Sascha
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:23:02AM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
A shell script generating build-exports.mk is attached.
The implementation lacks cyclic reference detection (some
header files point to each other). This can be resolved by
splitting the 2-3 header files
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
However I completely disagree that Python (or Perl or PHP) is
a good choice for use in build systems.
As part of the configure process, I would agree with you, but as part of
buildconf, I disagree--not everyone needs to run buildconf--only
developers, and if
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Patrick Welche wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:23:02AM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
A shell script generating build-exports.mk is attached.
The implementation lacks cyclic reference detection (some
header files point to each other). This can be
Ben Laurie wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to float the idea of releasing 1.3.30 soonish.
one question: who would support putting the 1.3 versions of
mod_backtrace and mod_whatkilledus in experimental?
+1.
+1
Greg
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:17:32AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
httpd is still just as buildable on such platforms regardless of
gen-build.py: from the release tarballs. Building from a CVS checkout
cannot be done without extra tools, but that has always been true in
2.0: you need libtool
From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 6:00 PM
And the notion of well, now it doesn't build on my platform is quite
suspect. The output of the process (run at buildconf time) is
build-outputs.mk. Just copy that from *anywhere* to your target platform.
We
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
However I completely disagree that Python (or Perl or PHP) is
a good choice for use in build systems.
As part of the configure process, I would agree with you, but as part of
buildconf, I disagree--not everyone needs to run buildconf--only
developers, and if you're
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:10:06PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Or even platforms you have heard of: within hours of this change I had
complaints from people who couldn't build snapshots in order to try out
mod_log_forensic...
I hate to chime in here, but I must
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 06:12:07PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 6:00 PM
And the notion of well, now it doesn't build on my platform is quite
suspect. The output of the process (run at buildconf time) is
I am still confused as to what this all means. What do you all mean
by Platform. I keep reading these email messages and it sounds like
Platform == Linux. NetWare doesn't use buildconf but yet we still
have to generate the files. We also don't build directly on the NetWare
platform, we
Greg Stein wrote:
I hate to chime in here, but I must agree. Things have certainly
come a long way when the build/configure system tried to
be as LCD (lowest common denominator) as possible.
And it was a recursive make solution which we're trying to fix. If you can
come up with an LCD
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 19:59, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
I hate to chime in here, but I must agree. Things have certainly
come a long way when the build/configure system tried to
be as LCD (lowest common denominator) as possible.
And it was a recursive make solution
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:50:55AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I am still confused as to what this all means. What do you all mean
by Platform. I keep reading these email messages and it sounds like
Platform == Linux.
The Platform will be NetWare. The gen-build script should be able to
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 19:50, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I am still confused as to what this all means. What do you all mean
by Platform. I keep reading these email messages and it sounds like
Platform == Linux. NetWare doesn't use buildconf but yet we still
have to generate the files. We also
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:59:28PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
No, I have no solutions, nor did I mean to imply that:
o Such a solution is trivial
o That the solution used was done with no
thought of impact to developers.
Well, thought *was* applied, but to be honest, I/we
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 06:28:34PM +0100, Axel Grossklaus wrote:
i am currently working on mod_authn_dbi (part of the 2.1 Authentication
Project http://mod-auth.sourceforge.net/) which uses the new
authentication framework of apache 2.1. and was wondering if it
was still possible to suggest
The way I suspect Greg is heading is that you get a
./gen-build.py netware, which can be run on any platform to
produce the things you need to do the Netware build. So
this should be an improvement, since you don't have to move
files, build a tool, move it back, then build.
OK, now I understand
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:12:59PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
The way I suspect Greg is heading is that you get a
./gen-build.py netware, which can be run on any platform to
produce the things you need to do the Netware build. So
this should be an improvement, since you don't have to move
--On Friday, February 20, 2004 8:09 PM + Patrick Welche
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an off-the-cuff remark: How does this tie in with say SASL
(old page at: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/sasl/) ?
(vision of mod_sasl, then plug in any old authentication method
into that)
SASL is more generic than
33 matches
Mail list logo
