Please have a look at the attached file.
--- Trend GateLock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (主機：higp5.gatelock.com.tw)
** 中毒檔案 your_file.pif 已刪除。
Trend GateLock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (主機：higp5.gatelock.com.tw)
** 在檔案 your_file.pif 中發現病毒
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/01/04 15:08:00 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related proj
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/03/17 23:52:12 $]
Release:
2.0.49 : in development
2.0.48 : released October 29, 2003 as GA.
2.0.47 : released July 09, 2003 as GA.
2.0.46 : released May 28, 2003 as GA.
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/03/08 23:27:45 $]
Release:
1.3.30-dev: In development. Jim proposes a release around the
start of March, 2004.
1.3.29: Tagged October 24, 2003. Announced Oct 29, 2003.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 5:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] 1.3.29 MPE port update, piped logs, and strdup
>
>
> Bixby, Mark (TCSD-MISL-Cupertino) wrote:
...snip...
> > 2) The piped logs pro
* Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|__ Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 08:31:21PM +0100:
> You can find -rc3 in the usual place. The differences with
> rc2 are:
>
> - mod_cgid fix
> - docs update
> - windows build fix
Looking good on;
- Red Hat Linux 7.2, 7.3, 8.0, 9.0
- Fedora Core 1 Linux
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 04:59:45PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> Flops on BSD/OS 5.X
>
> PLEASE accommodate for BSD/OS 5.X
Looks like you may have missed previous message(s) on this topic. To
make any progress on this issue, please attach the complete output of
configure to the bug report:
http:/
The Doctor wrote:
Flops on BSD/OS 5.X
PLEASE accommodate for BSD/OS 5.X
As was stated before on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a) not a regression; IOW 2.0.49 is not worse on BSD/OS 5 than 2.0.48 was
b) problem is apparently in libtool, something we can't fix anyway
Flops on BSD/OS 5.X
PLEASE accommodate for BSD/OS 5.X
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 03:26:30PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> Looking good on NetWare
>
> Brad
>
> Brad Nicholes
> Senior Software Engineer
> Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
> http://www.novell.com
>
> >>>
Oh man !! I don't know how I missed it
!
Thanks
-Madhu
-Original
Message-From: Jean-Jacques Clar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 3:11
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/support ab.c
The added call to u
The added call to usage() on line 2165 is missing the closing parenthesis.
JJ>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/17/2004 11:22:35 AM >>>
madhum 2004/03/17 10:22:35 Modified: support ab.c Log: Limit the concurrency to MAX_CONCURRENCY. Otherwise, ab may dump core (calloc fails) when a arbitrarily
Cl Jeff. It worked like a miracle.
It now works fine.
Thanks a million !!!
Naga
--- Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Naga Bussa wrote:
>
> > I am sorry I forgot to mention that this is a
> problem
> > only a server which built specifically for DMZ
> outside
> > of the company
Looking good on NetWare
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, March 17, 2004 12:31:21 PM >>>
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 20:16, Andre Breiler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 20:16, Andre Breiler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
> > >
> > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> >
> > I guess
Bill Stoddard wrote:
>
> Sander Striker wrote:
>
> > You can find -rc3 in the usual place. The differences with
> > rc2 are:
> >
> > - mod_cgid fix
> > - docs update
> > - windows build fix
> >
> > Sander
> >
>
> Quick sniff on Windows 2000 looks good.
>
> Bill
>
Quick sniff on Sol8 an
Sander Striker wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 20:16, Andre Breiler wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I guess you didn't get around to do the -rc3 yet.
Actually, I did :)
You can find -rc3
Sander Striker wrote:
And I've seen major concerns, so we'll see an rc3, tomorrow night.
+1 from me on rc3; tested on HP-UX 11.11 and AIX 5.2
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 06:35, Greg Stein wrote:
> hehe... it's probably because I sympathize. Back in '96, when I went to
> work for Microsoft, I caught some heat from some random guy in the Python
> community. When Guido replied with, effectively, "oh, shut the hell up.
> Greg's contributed more t
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 01:27:18PM -0500, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> Oh Greg you big pooper,
>
> There you go getting all balanced and objective on us ... :-)
hehe... it's probably because I sympathize. Back in '96, when I went to
work for Microsoft, I caught some heat from some random guy in the Pyth
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
> I think (as a rule) that no program should segfault on the user - it
> reflects badly on the design. It should error out if it thinks there's
> something wrong ! (especially programs like 'ab')
I agree.
--Cliff
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 20:16, Andre Breiler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
> >
> > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I guess you didn't get around to do the -rc3 yet.
Actually, I did :)
You can fi
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I guess you didn't get around to do the -rc3 yet.
It seems that -rc2 works with
--- snip ---
www11: uname -a
SunOS www11.thny.bbc.co.uk 5.8 Generic_1085
Oh Greg you big pooper,
There you go getting all balanced and objective on us ... :-)
On March 17, 2004 12:42 pm, Greg Stein wrote:
> One thing that I'd like to point out here: the ASF cares about end
> users who are on the SCO platform. Yes, the httpd PMC considered making
> some sort of stateme
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
>
>heap allocation failed... I just wanted to know ;)
>
>okay, so your max of 2 sounds reasonable (plenty generous)
>to me... with
>63K or so max ephemeral ports, you're not going to go far
>unless connection
Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hi,
If the "-c" option is given a arbitrarily huge value,
ab dumps core.
(Try: ab -c 2147483647 http://foo.com/)
why does it dump core? malloc says sure I
I think (as a rule) that no program should
segfault on the user - it reflects badly on the design. It should error out
if it thinks there's something wrong !
(especially programs like 'ab')
-Madhu
-Original
Message-From: Jean-Jacques Clar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wedne
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
>
>Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
>> Hi,
>> If the "-c" option is given a arbitrarily huge value,
>ab dumps core.
>> (Try: ab -c 2147483647 http://foo.com/)
>
>why does it dump core? malloc says sure I can give
Just a quick survey on how robust ab should be.
I think that ab should not seg fault on any user parameters,
I could spent some time making it a little bit more robust.
Is it of any interest, or the general thinking is; if the user enters an out of range or a bogus value and seg fault, this sh
Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hi,
If the "-c" option is given a arbitrarily huge value, ab dumps core.
(Try: ab -c 2147483647 http://foo.com/)
why does it dump core? malloc says sure I can give you 2GB but then we
segfault trying to access the pages? or something else?
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 06:16:07PM -0800, Kean Johnston wrote:
> > By the way, for SCO OpenServer, I have a package called 'GWXLIBS' - it
>
> My appologies ... I meant this to be a private reply but did not check
> the address. For everyone who is not [EMAIL PROTECTED] please ignore.
Don't apolo
One thing that I'd like to point out here: the ASF cares about end users
who are on the SCO platform. Yes, the httpd PMC considered making some
sort of statement or removing support or whatever for SCO when this stuff
first started, but we came to the right end position: end users matter,
and if en
Hi,
If the "-c" option is given a arbitrarily huge value, ab dumps core.
(Try: ab -c 2147483647 http://foo.com/)
Here's a patch that limits the concurrency to MAX_CONCURRENCY (= 2). The actual
value of MAX_CONCURRENCY can be raised/lowered if you think the value is not
appropriate.
Sometime negative values are displayed in the min column of the Connection Times statistics.
I sure will find out why, but the following patch make sure that cannot happen and does not hurt.
Please comments.
If no comments, I will commit it later today.
Thanks,
@@ -1286,9 +1286,9 @@ c->don
On March 16, 2004 09:52 pm, Kean Johnston wrote:
> > Do we need to buy a license?
>
> No but if you send us money we'll donate it to the End Sarcasm
> Campaign.
Is that a SCO project or some godless communist movement? I ask only
information...
> Then some smart-ass thought it would be funny to
Current code (and sample output) is at
http://www.apache.org/~trawick/exception_hook.html.
Both mod_backtrace and mod_whatkilledus are significantly revamped recently to
catch up with the versions in 1.3.30-dev/modules/experimental.
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 11:39, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > --On Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:19 PM + Ben Laurie
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> c) You appear to be assuming daily snapshots maintained forever in your
> >> story - if so, how do you deal with network p
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick
Is this to correct a problem for all Windows platforms which
manifests itself on Windows XP, or just something that people
with Windows XP may wish to play with, or what?
On pre-XP it behave like before, but on XP it has
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Trawick
>
> Is this to correct a problem for all Windows platforms which
> manifests itself on Windows XP, or just something that people
> with Windows XP may wish to play with, or what?
>
On pre-XP it behave like before, but on XP it has visual
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
As said in the subject...
The attached file ApacheMonitor.exe.manifest needs to be copied in the
/support/win32/ dir.
Is this to correct a problem for all Windows platforms which manifests itself
on Windows XP, or just something that people with Windows XP may wish to play
Naga Bussa wrote:
I am sorry I forgot to mention that this is a problem
only a server which built specifically for DMZ outside
of the company's intranet. The same Apache works fine
on other Solaris 8 server within the intranet.
These DMZ servers have a stripped down version of the
OS. So what I t
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:19 PM + Ben Laurie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
c) You appear to be assuming daily snapshots maintained forever in your
story - if so, how do you deal with network problems and the like? How
can you tell a commit that didn't make it to th
41 matches
Mail list logo
