Apache::TestMB returns 1

2004-07-02 Thread William McKee
Hi all, Sorry about that false start. Lemme try this again! As I was saying, David, thanks for adding support for Module::Build. I'm trying to replace one of my existing projects using the Apache::TestMB module. It works fine unless I try to do something with the return value from the examples:

Re: Apache::TestMB returns 1

2004-07-02 Thread David Wheeler
On Jul 2, 2004, at 9:19 AM, William McKee wrote: Thanks for your efforts in adding support Glad it works for you! This reminds me: --- Test.pm.~1.84.~ Fri Jun 25 18:55:53 2004 +++ Test.pm Fri Jul 2 09:27:18 2004 @@ -807,7 +807,8 @@ exports a number of useful functions for sending request to the

Re: Apache::TestMB returns 1

2004-07-02 Thread David Wheeler
On Jul 2, 2004, at 9:34 AM, William McKee wrote: Hi all, Sorry about that false start. Lemme try this again! As I was saying, David, thanks for adding support for Module::Build. I'm trying to replace one of my existing projects using the Apache::TestMB module. It works fine unless I try to do

Apache::TestMB returns 1

2004-07-02 Thread William McKee
Hi David, Thanks for your efforts in adding support -- Knowmad Services Inc. http://www.knowmad.com

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

2004-07-02 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 07:45 PM 7/1/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: minfrin 2004/07/01 17:45:43 1.751.2.942 +6 -1 httpd-2.0/STATUS +*) Add the NOTICE file to the rpm spec file in compliance with the Apache + v2.0 license. + build/rpm/httpd.spec.in: 1.6 + +1: minfrin As you

Where do historical httpd binaries go?

2004-07-02 Thread Graham Leggett
Hi all, Where do historical binaries get moved to (if anywhere)? Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Where do historical httpd binaries go?

2004-07-02 Thread Joshua Slive
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Graham Leggett wrote: Hi all, Where do historical binaries get moved to (if anywhere)? http://archives.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/ Joshua.

Re: Where do historical httpd binaries go?

2004-07-02 Thread Joshua Slive
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Joshua Slive wrote: On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Graham Leggett wrote: Hi all, Where do historical binaries get moved to (if anywhere)? http://archives.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/ Ahhh Make that http://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/ And note that the moving is

Re: Where do historical httpd binaries go?

2004-07-02 Thread Graham Leggett
Joshua Slive wrote: Ahhh Make that http://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/ Found it, thanks. And note that the moving is automatic: everything from www.apache.org/dist/ goes there automatically, and nothing is ever deleted. Automatic as in a script does it? I just moved the old release

Re: Where do historical httpd binaries go?

2004-07-02 Thread Joshua Slive
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Graham Leggett wrote: And note that the moving is automatic: everything from www.apache.org/dist/ goes there automatically, and nothing is ever deleted. Automatic as in a script does it? I just moved the old release I was replacing manually from

Re: making httpd v2.0.50 binary RPMS available

2004-07-02 Thread Sander Temme
On Jul 1, 2004, at 3:25 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: Should these resulting RPM files be made available in the binaries directory, or should we wait till v2.0.51? Well, the only delta is the SPEC file, right? How about publishing your RPMs, pointing out that they represent a small delta w.r.t. the

Re: making httpd v2.0.50 binary RPMS available

2004-07-02 Thread Graham Leggett
Sander Temme wrote: Well, the only delta is the SPEC file, right? Correct. How about publishing your RPMs, pointing out that they represent a small delta w.r.t. the 2.0.50 tag, and rolling a patch representing those changes? That way, we have viable RPMs available, and if folks want to roll

Time for 1.3.32 ?

2004-07-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'm floating the idea of releasing 1.3.32 shortly... Comments or thoughts?

Re: Time for 1.3.32 ?

2004-07-02 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:14 PM 7/2/2004, you wrote: I'm floating the idea of releasing 1.3.32 shortly... Comments or thoughts? Let me get the mutex protection into mod_rewrite after this holiday weekend - win32 1.3 mod_rewrite users can finally be happy :) Bill

Re: Time for 1.3.32 ?

2004-07-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
Jim Jagielski wrote: I'm floating the idea of releasing 1.3.32 shortly... Comments or thoughts? I'll be happy to help re-review diffs with 1.3.31 and test release candidates (or tags or HEAD or whatever) and so forth. No strong feelings either way though.

Re: Trying to test current apreq2 CVS

2004-07-02 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Markus Wichitill wrote: Hi, I tried to compile the latest apreq2 CVS on Linux to test $upload-fh/size. First I tried to compile it for mod_perl 1.99_14 (Apache 2.0.50 Worker, Perl 5.8.3), which failed since that version doesn't contain the required

Re: Trying to test current apreq2 CVS

2004-07-02 Thread Stas Bekman
Randy Kobes wrote: The following patch to the mod_perl 2 cvs sources should include modperl_common_types in the list of header files to install in apache2/include: +1 -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl

Re: Time for 1.3.32 ?

2004-07-02 Thread Andr Malo
* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 01:14 PM 7/2/2004, you wrote: I'm floating the idea of releasing 1.3.32 shortly... Comments or thoughts? Let me get the mutex protection into mod_rewrite after this holiday weekend - win32 1.3 mod_rewrite users can finally be happy :) To