[STATUS] (flood) Wed Jul 21 23:45:32 EDT 2004

2004-07-22 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
flood STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2003/07/01 20:55:12 $] Release: 1.0: Released July 23, 2002 milestone-03: Tagged January 16, 2002 ASF-transfer: Released July 17, 2001 milestone-02: Tagged August 13,

Some benchs results : WAS: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
I made some benchs on my Linux Fedora Core 2 on a P4 2.8ghz / 1Gb RAM : Apache 2.0.50 in - Apache 2.0.50 alone (simple html file) - TC 3.3.2/Coyote 1.1 - Apache 2.0.50 + jk 1.2.6 + TC 3.3.2/jk2 JkMount /examples/* local worker.local.port=8009 worker.local.host=localhost worker.local.type=ajp13

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/filters mod_deflate.c

2004-07-22 Thread Nick Kew
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Joe Orton wrote: Nothing like that was posted to the list, at least. Patch below is still sufficient to fix the proxy+304 case; does it work for you too? Yes, mostly (it fixes the important bug that was previously a showstopper). And it's an improvement on my hack by

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/filters mod_deflate.c

2004-07-22 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Nick Kew wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Joe Orton wrote: Nothing like that was posted to the list, at least. Patch below is still sufficient to fix the proxy+304 case; does it work for you too? Yes, mostly (it fixes the important bug that was previously a showstopper).

Re: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev

2004-07-22 Thread Graham Leggett
Guernsey, Byron (GE Consumer Industrial) wrote: We are using mod_proxy and a patched mod_rewrite to do sticky load balancing. Mod_rewrite supports cookies, but not session based cookies. I added this functionality and posted the patch here (see mod_rewrite cookie patch (PR#28391))- still

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/filters mod_deflate.c

2004-07-22 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 12:20:33PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote: On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Nick Kew wrote: On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Joe Orton wrote: Nothing like that was posted to the list, at least. Patch below is still sufficient to fix the proxy+304 case; does it work for you too? Yes,