a module which creates child processes which access the scoreboard
must create that child in the pre_mpm hook, since that is the hook
where the scoreboard is created
(it must be hooked after the core's pre_mpm hook so that the
scoreboard has already been created)
but this hook isn't called on grac
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 06:19:48 -0400, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if a module could determine if the server is gracefully restarting,
the only way to determine this is to hook the error log and look for
the different NOTICE messages issued by MPMs:
prefork: Graceful restart requeste
hi all
the attached patch is required for me to get mod_proxy to compile with -Werror.
--Geoff
Index: modules/proxy/proxy_ftp.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/modules/proxy/proxy_ftp.c,v
retrieving revision 1.145
diff -u -r1.145 p
I took a look at the worker and prefork mpms and it seems that
make_child registers the just_die function for SIGTERM for child
processes. Now just_die does try to do a gracefull shutdown by calling
clean_child_exit, but what happens if clean_child_exit gets called
twice?
Hopefully I'm just readin
At 01:56 AM 8/17/2004, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>At 03:58 PM 8/16/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>>
>>> The addition of the proxy_ajp module to the httpd project presents a
>>>build problem. The AJP module code exists in httpd/modules/proxy in the
>>>httpd project but t
I've just looked at the new code - thanks folks. My own interest in
proxying is with HTTP backends, both in forward and reverse contexts,
and doing so efficiently.
Couple of questions:
(1) The proxy balancer directives are implemented in mod_proxy.c,
not proxy_balancer.c. Was this necessar
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:48:39AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> hi all
>
> the attached patch is required for me to get mod_proxy to compile with -Werror.
Thanks Geoff. The only thing I'm not sure of is whether this function
should really be deleted or if it's actually intended to be exported:
Nick Kew wrote:
(1) The proxy balancer directives are implemented in mod_proxy.c,
not proxy_balancer.c. Was this necessary?
proxy_balancer should in theory provide the algorithm to do the
balancing, while the generic directives to specify the members of the
cluster could be generically speci
At 04:36 PM 8/17/2004, Joe Orton wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:48:39AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>> hi all
>>
>> the attached patch is required for me to get mod_proxy to compile with -Werror.
>
>Thanks Geoff. The only thing I'm not sure of is whether this function
>should really be delet
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
> > (1) The proxy balancer directives are implemented in mod_proxy.c,
> > not proxy_balancer.c. Was this necessary?
>
> proxy_balancer should in theory provide the algorithm to do the
> balancing, while the generic directives to specify the members o
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 04:36 PM 8/17/2004, Joe Orton wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:48:39AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>>
>>>hi all
>>>
>>>the attached patch is required for me to get mod_proxy to compile with -Werror.
>>
>>Thanks Geoff. The only thing I'm not sure of is whet
Nick Kew wrote:
proxy_balancer should in theory provide the algorithm to do the
balancing, while the generic directives to specify the members of the
cluster could be generically specified.
Indeed. But not all of us have a cluster or want clustering code.
A single server with a single backend is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re-structure the auth_ldap module to fit the new authentication model. The authnz_ldap module provides an ldap authentication provider and an authorization handler. It implements the authorization "require" values ldap-user, ldap-dn and ldap-group.
Extremely cool.
> Thi
This is the first attempt to restructure mod_auth_ldap to fit the new
authentication model. There are a couple of things to note that I would
like some feedback on.
1. The ldap_authn provider and ldap_authz handler exist in the same
module. The reason for this is because both handlers depen
>The util_ldap module also needs to be moved out of the experimental
>directory (mod_auth*_ldap depends on mod_ldap).
This is my next task. Where should it be moved to? I was thinking of
creating an ldap directory under modules and putting it there. Or does
it make sense for one of the existin
BTW, since I am not a Linux makefile guru, the new authnz_ldap module
has not been added to the Linux build scripts. Can somebody make the
appropriate changes to the makefiles?
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.
Brad Nicholes wrote:
This is my next task. Where should it be moved to? I was thinking of
creating an ldap directory under modules and putting it there. Or does
it make sense for one of the existing module directories to be the new
home of util_ldap?
Not sure if anything else fits - an ldap dire
--On Tuesday, August 17, 2004 4:52 PM -0500 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have the same concern... Madhu is gone for about another week,
I think you mean Mladen not Madhu. ;-) -- justin
Geoffrey Young wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 04:36 PM 8/17/2004, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:48:39AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi all
the attached patch is required for me to get mod_proxy to compile with -Werror.
Thanks Geoff. The only thing I'm not sure of is whether
Hi,
I just noticed that the safe_env_list in suexec.c has one variable name
missing: SERVER_SIGNATURE. Here is a tivial patch to add it:
--- httpd-2.0.50/support/suexec.c.~20040209205949~ 2004-02-09 22:59:49.0
+0200
+++ httpd-2.0.50/support/suexec.c 2004-08-18 09:46:51.00
20 matches
Mail list logo
