I've noticed that if you build httpd normally (with DSO capability)
and then use apxs to try to build mod_cache, then when you try
to run the server you get:
mod_cache.so: symbol __floatdidf: referenced symbol not found
This is due to the fact that the required math functions to do some
date c
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 09:10:45 -0400, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed that if you build httpd normally (with DSO capability)
> and then use apxs to try to build mod_cache, then when you try
> to run the server you get:
>
>mod_cache.so: symbol __floatdidf: referenced symbol
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 09:10:45 -0400, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've noticed that if you build httpd normally (with DSO capability)
> > and then use apxs to try to build mod_cache, then when you try
> > to run the server you get:
> >
> >mod_cache.so: sy
hi all.
in 2.0 mod_so checks a given LoadModule statement against both static
modules and those previously loaded by LoadModule. in 1.3 it checks only
against those loaded with LoadModule, leaving open the possibility that
someone will try to dynamically load a module that is already compiled int
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 10:03:39 -0400 (EDT), Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 09:10:45 -0400, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've noticed that if you build httpd normally (with DSO capability)
> > > and then use apxs to try
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:03:39AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > If you add libgcc.a into any DSO, wouldn't that take care of the
> > issue? (does the SH_LIBS variable allow you to specify extra
> > libraries that should be linked into DSOs?)
>
> I'm thinking specifically
True, but this is one that I'm hitting a lot, especially
with the increase in cache development going on...
And this is the only bundled module that I've hit this on
when httpd is build "normally".
Joe Orton wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:03:39AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Jeff Trawi
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>
> Get a different compiler? Look for some gcc option to cause it to
> generate different code?
>
This all presumes that you're building httpd knowing in advance
that you'll be building mod_cache via apxs later (in which
case, if you know that, then why bother) ). I was
--On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 1:00 PM -0400 Jim Jagielski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
True, but this is one that I'm hitting a lot, especially
with the increase in cache development going on...
And this is the only bundled module that I've hit this on
when httpd is build "normally".
IMHO, the pr
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 10:41:44 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 1:00 PM -0400 Jim Jagielski
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > True, but this is one that I'm hitting a lot, especially
> > with the increase in cache development going on...
> >
> >
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> the attached patch is a direct port of the logic from 2.0 to 1.3. thoughts
> or insights on why this wouldn't be a good idea for 1.3 or other feedback
> appreciated.
Seems like a good idea to me.
-Rasmus
I'd like to propose a 1.3.32 release with a T&R either late this
week or early next.
There's enough changes to warrant it I think. In the meantime,
if people could test HEAD, that would be great! Especially
those hit by the mod_dav/mod_frontpage problems that
surfaced with 1.3.31.
--On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 2:06 PM -0400 Jeff Trawick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Won't gcc 3.2+ have dynamic reference to libgcc_s.so instead of static
reference to libgcc.a?
gcc 3.3 on Mac OS X and gcc 3.4.0 (stock) on Solaris both refer to libgcc.a.
*shrug*
gcc < 3 will have static referen
>
> It's better to try to figure this out than greatly obfuscate our code to
> work around a bug in one compiler. So, I think our option is to try to
> figure what gcc-magic we need to call to get this right or just ignore it.
>
It's worth it, IMO, to avoid redistribution dependencies on gcc
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 01:00:40PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> True, but this is one that I'm hitting a lot, especially
> with the increase in cache development going on...
Then fix your build environment, or work out how the httpd build system
can be improved to avoid the issue in general. Mun
* Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to propose a 1.3.32 release with a T&R either late this
> week or early next.
Sounds good.
Though I'd like to point to the 2.0 status file, where a bugfix (to 2.0
and 1.3) is waiting for approval :)
nd
--
"Solides und umfangreiches Buch"
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 11:14:46 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 2:06 PM -0400 Jeff Trawick
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Won't gcc 3.2+ have dynamic reference to libgcc_s.so instead of static
> > reference to libgcc.a?
>
> gcc 3.3 on Mac OS
i get the following compile error with the sun forte compiler on solaris 2.8:
/usr/local/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=compile cc
-g -mt-DSOLARIS2=8 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REENTRANT
-I/usr/local/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/include
-I/usr/local/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr-u
On Sep 7, 2004, at 2:20 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 01:00:40PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
True, but this is one that I'm hitting a lot, especially
with the increase in cache development going on...
Then fix your build environment, or work out how the httpd build system
can be impr
--On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 2:48 PM +1000 Ian Holsman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok.. so I've started playing with mod-cache again, and I noticed the
following:
- there is no way to cache something with query-args which doesn't return
a expires tag.
proposal: add a CacheIgnoreNoExpires direct
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 14:50:50 -0400, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sep 7, 2004, at 2:20 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 01:00:40PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> True, but this is one that I'm hitting a lot, especially
> >> with the increase in cache dev
it doesn't have to be mod_cache
and it doesn't have to be built with apxs
it just has to be built as a DSO with gcc, and it can reference
libgcc.a symbols that weren't included in httpd and/or weren't
exported by httpd
True 'nuff... I was simply trying to indicate a quick
and dirty way to recreate
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 2:48 PM +1000 Ian Holsman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok.. so I've started playing with mod-cache again, and I noticed the
following:
- there is no way to cache something with query-args which doesn't return
a expires tag.
proposal: add a Ca
Of course, assuming any dependencies do exist, doing
a "full" build in an environment where "just"libgcc.a
exists will cause the required functions to be statically
linked in, so you avoid the external library (.so)
dependency... Still need to build mod_cache though
inline with httpd...
By the by,
Just a thought... why does this restriction exist in the first place?
Because, a long time ago, queries contained mostly user-defined
strings that were not likely to result in a later hit, so it wasn't
worth the effort. Now, some web applications use a bogus query
string in order to override cachi
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 02:50:50PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Here's the scenario:
>
>1. Build httpd
>2. Now build mod_cache as a DSO with apxs
>3. Now try to load it in and run it
>
> You'll see that this results in a dependency on libgcc.
> Do we *want* a dependency on libgcc? I
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 08:57:31PM +0200, solo turn wrote:
> i get the following compile error with the sun forte compiler on solaris 2.8:
>
> /usr/local/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=compile cc
> -g -mt-DSOLARIS2=8 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REENTRANT
> -I/usr/local/h
anyone know how in the hell i can get off these mailing lists? they are ruining my lifesolo turn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i get the following compile error with the sun forte compiler on solaris 2.8:/usr/local/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=compile cc -g -mt -DSOLARIS2=8 -D_POSI
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 12:30:34 -0400, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 09:23:27 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --On Friday, September 3, 2004 12:14 PM -0400 Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > I'm using head, with
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
> * Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to propose a 1.3.32 release with a T&R either late this
> > week or early next.
>
> Sounds good.
> Though I'd like to point to the 2.0 status file, where a bugfix (to 2.0
> and 1.3) is wa
Jeff Trawick wrote:
[Fri Sep 03 12:05:59 2004] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File does not
exist: proxy:http://127.0.0.1:10101/cgi-bin/printenv
If nobody can/has reproduced the problem, I'll dig into it this weekend.
I had time dig into it enough to get the feeling that it is something
that the balanc
31 matches
Mail list logo
