Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache Test.pm

2004-10-21 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jorton 2004/10/20 06:42:07 Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache Test.pm Log: Add the need_php4 export. It's of little value if it's not documented, especially when the rest is. Joe, please see the pod at the end of that file (search for need_php).

[STATUS] (flood) Wed Oct 20 23:45:38 EDT 2004

2004-10-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
flood STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2003/07/01 20:55:12 $] Release: 1.0: Released July 23, 2002 milestone-03: Tagged January 16, 2002 ASF-transfer: Released July 17, 2001 milestone-02: Tagged August 13,

[STATUS] (perl-framework) Wed Oct 20 23:45:40 EDT 2004

2004-10-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2002/03/09 05:22:48 $] Stuff to do: * finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if framework failed) * change existing tests that frob the DocumentRoot (e.g.,

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache Test.pm

2004-10-21 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 11:37:45PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jorton 2004/10/20 06:42:07 Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache Test.pm Log: Add the need_php4 export. It's of little value if it's not documented, especially when the rest is.

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache Test.pm

2004-10-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Joe Orton wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 11:37:45PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jorton 2004/10/20 06:42:07 Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache Test.pm Log: Add the need_php4 export. It's of little value if it's not documented, especially when the rest is.

Re: mod_include patch

2004-10-21 Thread Torsten Frtsch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 20 October 2004 18:49, André Malo wrote: I want to use SSI with CGI scripts. Thus, I have configured the INCLUDES filter for my cgi-bin. But my CGI scripts generate not only text/html documents. Hence my problem, I want to say

Re: mod_include patch

2004-10-21 Thread Andr Malo
* Torsten Förtsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 20 October 2004 18:49, André Malo wrote: I want to use SSI with CGI scripts. Thus, I have configured the INCLUDES filter for my cgi-bin. But my CGI scripts generate not only text/html

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Roman Gavrilov
so what would you suggest I should do ? implement it by myself ? Bill Stoddard wrote: Graham Leggett wrote: Roman Gavrilov wrote: In my opinion it would be more efficient to let one process complete the request (using maximum line throughput) and return some busy code to other identical,

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Roman Gavrilov wrote: so what would you suggest I should do ? implement it by myself ? No, just look at http://sysoev.ru/mod_accel/ It's Apache 1.3 module as you need. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/ Bill Stoddard wrote: Graham Leggett wrote: Roman Gavrilov

Re: mod_include patch

2004-10-21 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Torsten [iso-8859-15] Förtsch wrote: Why don't you just use addoutputfilterbytype? because I am using another mod_perl output filter that should be called *after* INCLUDES. There is a PerlSetOutputFilter directive that preserves filter ordering but it adds the filter

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Roman Gavrilov
after checking the mod_accel I found out that it works only with http, we need the cache proxy to work both with http and https. What was the reason for disabling https proxying caching ? Regards, Roman Igor Sysoev wrote: On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Roman Gavrilov wrote: so what

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Graham Leggett
Roman Gavrilov wrote: so what would you suggest I should do ? implement it by myself ? At the moment that's probably your best option. Is this for Apache v1.3 or v2.0? Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Roman Gavrilov wrote: after checking the mod_accel I found out that it works only with http, we need the cache proxy to work both with http and https. What was the reason for disabling https proxying caching ? How do you think to do https reverse proxying ? Igor

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Roman Gavrilov
I don't see any problem using it, actually I am doing it. I am not talking about proxying between http and https. Mostly its used for mirroring (both frontend and backend use https only) no redirections on backend though :) ProxyPass /foo/bar https:/mydomain/foobar/ ProxyPassReverse

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Roman Gavrilov wrote: I don't see any problem using it, actually I am doing it. I am not talking about proxying between http and https. Mostly its used for mirroring (both frontend and backend use https only) no redirections on backend though :) ProxyPass /foo/bar

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Roman Gavrilov
No, when https request gets to the server(apache), its being decrypted first then passed through apache routines, when it gets to the proxy part the URI already decrypted. proxy in its turn issues a request to the backend https server and returns the answer to the client of course after

Re: Apache with Security Processor - Interesting

2004-10-21 Thread Madhusudan Mathihalli
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:10:53 -0400, Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On October 20, 2004 02:44 am, Madhusudan Mathihalli wrote: If ppl think it'll be a good addition to Apache, I can clean it up and try to commit it sometime tomorrow. Did the control-command support ever make it into

POST data input filter questions.

2004-10-21 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Hello, I apologize in advance if I'm in the wrong place. I have searched through the documentation provided through httpd.apache.org and the 2.0 (doxygen) API. Plus many of the examples. I'm interested in implementing a module. I realize that this isn't the best place to ask, but the modules

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Roman Gavrilov wrote: No, when https request gets to the server(apache), its being decrypted first then passed through apache routines, when it gets to the proxy part the URI already decrypted. proxy in its turn issues a request to the backend https server and returns

Re: Apache with Security Processor - Interesting

2004-10-21 Thread Geoff Thorpe
On October 21, 2004 01:05 pm, Madhusudan Mathihalli wrote: On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:10:53 -0400, Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did the control-command support ever make it into a cvs-worthy form? Nope - I don't believe it is in the CVS. Can you re-send the patch ? Um, all I have is an

OpenSSL with Security Processor

2004-10-21 Thread Gurpreet Grewal
I am facing a problem when I am trying to use the OpenSSL (0.9.7d to be precise) with the BraodCom BCM5823 card. I tried running the following two commands- openssl des3 -in inputfile -out outputfile -engine ubsec openssl des3 -in inputfile -out outputfile Ideally the first

OpenSSL with Security Processor

2004-10-21 Thread Gurpreet Grewal
I know this might not be the best forum to do this posting. But I am facing this problem since a long time now. When I am trying to use the OpenSSL (0.9.7d to be precise) with the BraodCom BCM5823 card. I tried running the following two commands- openssl des3 -in inputfile -out outputfile

Re: OpenSSL with Security Processor

2004-10-21 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Gurpreet Grewal wrote: Any clues where in the OpenSSL code I should be looking for ensuring that SSL card is actually being used for processing? Looking into openssl-0.9.7d\crypto\engine\hw_ubsec.c didn't help much? You should direct this question to the openssl mailing