Re: OpenSSL with Security Processor

2004-10-21 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Gurpreet Grewal wrote: > Any clues where in the OpenSSL code I should be looking for ensuring > that SSL card is actually being used for processing? Looking into > openssl-0.9.7d\crypto\engine\hw_ubsec.c > didn't help much? You should direct this question to the openssl maili

OpenSSL with Security Processor

2004-10-21 Thread Gurpreet Grewal
I know this might not be the best forum to do this posting. But I am facing this problem since a long time now. When I am trying to use the OpenSSL (0.9.7d to be precise) with the BraodCom BCM5823 card. I tried running the following two commands- openssl des3 -in inputfile -out outputfile -

OpenSSL with Security Processor

2004-10-21 Thread Gurpreet Grewal
I am facing a problem when I am trying to use the OpenSSL (0.9.7d to be precise) with the BraodCom BCM5823 card. I tried running the following two commands- openssl des3 -in inputfile -out outputfile -engine ubsec openssl des3 -in inputfile -out outputfile Ideally the first command

Re: Apache with Security Processor - Interesting

2004-10-21 Thread Geoff Thorpe
On October 21, 2004 01:05 pm, Madhusudan Mathihalli wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:10:53 -0400, Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Did the control-command support ever make it into a cvs-worthy form? > > Nope - I don't believe it is in the CVS. Can you re-send the patch ? Um, all I have

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Roman Gavrilov wrote: > No, when https request gets to the server(apache), its being decrypted > first then passed through apache routines, when it gets > to the proxy part the URI already decrypted. proxy in its turn issues a > request to the backend https server and returns

POST data input filter questions.

2004-10-21 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Hello, I apologize in advance if I'm in the wrong place. I have searched through the documentation provided through httpd.apache.org and the 2.0 (doxygen) API. Plus many of the examples. I'm interested in implementing a module. I realize that this isn't the best place to ask, but the modules l

Re: Apache with Security Processor - Interesting

2004-10-21 Thread Madhusudan Mathihalli
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:10:53 -0400, Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On October 20, 2004 02:44 am, Madhusudan Mathihalli wrote: > > If ppl think it'll be a good addition to Apache, I can clean it up and > > try to commit it sometime tomorrow. > > Did the control-command support ever make

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Roman Gavrilov
No,  when https request gets to the server(apache), its being decrypted first then passed through apache routines, when it gets to the proxy part the URI already decrypted. proxy in its turn issues a request to the backend https server and returns the answer to the client of course after cachi

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Roman Gavrilov wrote: > I don't see any problem using it, actually I am doing it. I am not > talking about proxying between http and https. > Mostly its used for mirroring (both frontend and backend use https only) > no redirections on backend though :) > > > ProxyPass /foo/ba

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Roman Gavrilov
I don't see any problem using it, actually I am doing it. I am not talking about proxying between http and https. Mostly its used for mirroring (both frontend and backend use https only) no redirections on backend though :) ProxyPass /foo/bar https:/mydomain/foobar/ ProxyPassReverse https:/m

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Roman Gavrilov wrote: > after checking the mod_accel I found out that it works only with http, > we need the cache & proxy to work both with http and https. > What was the reason for disabling https proxying & caching ? How do you think to do https reverse proxying ? Igor

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Graham Leggett
Roman Gavrilov wrote: so what would you suggest I should do ? implement it by myself ? At the moment that's probably your best option. Is this for Apache v1.3 or v2.0? Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Roman Gavrilov
after checking the mod_accel I found out that it works only with http, we need the cache & proxy  to work both with http and https. What was the reason for disabling https proxying & caching ? Regards, Roman Igor Sysoev wrote: On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Roman Gavrilov wrote: so what

Re: mod_include patch

2004-10-21 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Torsten [iso-8859-15] Förtsch wrote: > > Why don't you just use addoutputfilterbytype? > > because I am using another mod_perl output filter that should be called > *after* INCLUDES. > > There is a PerlSetOutputFilter directive that preserves filter ordering but it > adds the

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Roman Gavrilov wrote: > so what would you suggest I should do ? > implement it by myself ? No, just look at http://sysoev.ru/mod_accel/ It's Apache 1.3 module as you need. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/ > Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > Graham Leggett wrote: > > > >> Roman Ga

Re: mod_proxy reverse proxy optimization/performance question

2004-10-21 Thread Roman Gavrilov
so what would you suggest I should do ? implement it by myself ? Bill Stoddard wrote: Graham Leggett wrote: Roman Gavrilov wrote: In my opinion it would be more efficient to let one process complete the request (using maximum line throughput) and return some busy code to other identical, simultan

Re: mod_include patch

2004-10-21 Thread André Malo
* Torsten Förtsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 20 October 2004 18:49, André Malo wrote: > > > I want to use SSI with CGI scripts. Thus, I have configured the INCLUDES > > > filter for my cgi-bin. But my CGI scripts generate not only