On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:23:51PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
With fix 329484 committed, I'm now getting a clean test run of the
perl_framework tests with --enable-pool-debug=all
Thanks, all test runs passed last night here too.
joe
On Sunday 30 October 2005 04:09, Paul Querna wrote:
2.1.9-Beta is available from:
http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/httpd-2.1.9/
Please test and vote on releasing 2.1.9 as BETA.
compiling
As a reminder, if you know of any issues you consider a SHOW STOPPER for
a 2.2.0 stable
Hi,
does anybody know if it is possible to debug httpd binaries which have been
configured with
--enable-pie with gdb?
(And if yes, how :-))
Regards
Rüdiger
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 09:56:45AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:23:51PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
With fix 329484 committed, I'm now getting a clean test run of the
perl_framework tests with --enable-pool-debug=all
Thanks, all test runs passed last night here too.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:34:30AM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
does anybody know if it is possible to debug httpd binaries which have
been configured with --enable-pie with gdb? (And if yes, how :-))
Yes, there's nothing special you need to do other than find a version of
gdb in which it
On 10/30/2005 02:20 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
Yes, there's nothing special you need to do other than find a version of
gdb in which it works. (which is not necessarily easy)
I guess this is the big problem. I tried with the latest and it did not
work. Do you know a version number of gdb where
Nick Kew wrote:
Someone still needs to sort out experimental MPMs, and especially purge
perchild, as it tantalises the users so.
AFAICT leader and threadpool are also dead, and event is a potential
candidate for stable, yesno?
They persist on /trunk/ if anyone wants to revisit them. In the
Paul Querna wrote:
I run 2.1.8, on FreeBSD 5.4. I don't use the Ports. I don't believe any
extra patches should be required.
Now I see what the patches are for, the stock make install craps all over
/usr/local. And there appears to be some changes in APR that prevent
mod_dav_userdir from
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 03:28:43PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I guess this is the big problem. I tried with the latest and it did not
work. Do you know a version number of gdb where it works? I already googled
for
it, but I was not able to find it.
I thought you needed RH-specific patches
On 10/30/2005 06:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I thought you needed RH-specific patches - that is, no regular
(i.e. GNU-stock) version of GDB will support PIE. -- justin
Thanks for the hint. Meanwhile I downloaded the source RPM of
On Oct 30, 2005, at 4:17 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 09:56:45AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:23:51PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
With fix 329484 committed, I'm now getting a clean test run of the
perl_framework tests with --enable-pool-debug=all
I'm just looking at docs/2.1 and noting some existing pages that definitely
need updating. No reference to pages that need writing, or to non-English
versions of anything. I might tackle some of these myself, but no promises.
*** = really important, ** = should do, * = would be nice
**
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Hello,I understand that a module registers its own functions for different hooksin order to introduce its own functionality at different points of a requesthandling. I also understand that the module can specify if it wants its
function to be executed first, in the middle or last, with relation to
Brandon Fosdick wrote:
http://terran-bank.com/mod_dav_userdir_20051028.tar
I forgot about the SQL for creating tables.
http://terran-bank.com/create_terranbank.sql
sorry about that
On Oct 30, 2005, at 2:09 PM, Peter Djalaliev wrote:
Hello,
I understand that a module registers its own functions for
different hooks
in order to introduce its own functionality at different points of
a request
handling. I also understand that the module can specify if it wants
its
On Sunday 30 October 2005 22:40, Brian Pane wrote:
Strictly speaking, there's no guarantee that a request will be
processed by one and only one thread. It's possible for a
threaded MPM to hand off a request from one thread to another.
For example, the version of the Event MPM in 2.3 can run
On Oct 30, 2005, at 2:46 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sunday 30 October 2005 22:40, Brian Pane wrote:
Strictly speaking, there's no guarantee that a request will be
processed by one and only one thread. It's possible for a
threaded MPM to hand off a request from one thread to another.
For
Jim Gallacher wrote:
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
I think the proper thing to do (i forgot about the cookie and x86-64
issues) is to consider 3.2.3b as shut down by pre-release testing, so
it's just going to be a version that will never be publicly released.
The next step is to
On Sunday 30 October 2005 23:07, Brian Pane wrote:
On Oct 30, 2005, at 2:46 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Sunday 30 October 2005 22:40, Brian Pane wrote:
Strictly speaking, there's no guarantee that a request will be
processed by one and only one thread. It's possible for a
threaded MPM to hand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, I'm ignoring Platform notes (I know nothing about non-unix)
and Other Topics (too big a subject for this post).
Now that I'm done with writing my book, I'm hoping to tackle the
mod_rewrite documentation. Mostly the Rewrite Guide. I started
22 matches
Mail list logo
