We had talked about doing a 3.2 final release just after ApacheCon.
A couple of things have cropped up which we have (or should) fix, but
these will not be substantial changes from 3.2.5b. As such I think we
should do another beta followed very quickly by a final release. Any new
bugs that
My eyes keep glazing over every time I read through MODPYTHON-98. This
is not a reflection on Graham's excellent writing. I should probably
just drink some more coffee. :)
As Graham suggests I think raising an exception is the right way to go,
along with the documentation change to reflect
I declare the voting over and empty tuple wins in a landslide. :)
I'll commit the changes shortly.
Jim
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
+1 for the empty tuple too.
Regards,
Nicolas
2005/12/17, Jim Gallacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA) wrote:
[
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-99?page=all ]
Jim Gallacher resolved MODPYTHON-99:
Fix Version: 3.2
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Jim Gallacher
accessing some request or server object members causes a segfault
On 18/12/2005, at 3:09 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
We had talked about doing a 3.2 final release just after ApacheCon.
A couple of things have cropped up which we have (or should) fix, but
these will not be substantial changes from 3.2.5b. As such I think we
should do another beta followed
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-98?page=comments#action_12360697
]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-98:
---
To summarise the changes in the above into one spot so it is easier to see what
is required:
1. If say that
raise apache.SERVER_RETURN, apache.OK aborts handlers.
--
Key: MODPYTHON-100
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-100
Project: mod_python
Type: Bug
Components: core
Versions: 3.1.4, 3.2
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-94?page=comments#action_12360708
]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-94:
---
If we are going to do this, can we not truncate the ssl_var_lookup() function
name?
Ie., use req.ssl_var_lookup()
(gmake docs stdout) | grep -i apreq
/usr/home/pgollucci/dev/repos/asf/httpd/apreq/5.8.7_svn_prefork/include/apreq.h:239:
Warning: Member apreq_attr_to_type(T, A, P) of file apreq.h is not
documented.
/usr/home/pgollucci/dev/repos/asf/httpd/apreq/5.8.7_svn_prefork/include/apreq_error.h:43:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:37:25AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rpluem
Date: Sat Dec 17 01:37:22 2005
New Revision: 357333
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357333view=rev
Log:
* Add proposal for backport
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Modified:
On 12/17/2005 11:43 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:37:25AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..cut..]
FWIW, I believe Joe and I both explicitly said our votes count to merge
back to 2.0 and 2.2 on-list. So, I'd go ahead and just merge back to both
trees as well.
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
FWIW, I believe Joe and I both explicitly said our votes count to merge
back to 2.0 and 2.2 on-list. So, I'd go ahead and just merge back to both
trees as well. (A +1 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] is equivalent to a vote in STATUS.)
I also +1ed
--
On 12/16/2005 09:41 AM, Plüm wrote:
[..cut..]
Currently I am away from my development env. I hope I can post
a complete patch with all my ideas by tomorrow.
I worked out a new version of the patch. It is attached. I checked
it again with my jsp and it seems to work well. If nobody has
On Dec 17, 2005, at 11:32 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Index: server/core_filters.c
===
--- server/core_filters.c (Revision 357328)
+++ server/core_filters.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -315,8 +315,10 @@
Hi all,
I've been messing with this problem for years now. Apache at
least didn't support it in the public API somehow, so I
catched the connections file descriptor using a pre connection
hook and then created a thread that poll()'s on this to invoke
a connection abort handler I need within
On 12/17/05, Christian Parpart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I need is a way to install a hook within the apache
server process that gets invoked ASAP(!) the client connection
of interest has been aborted (mostly by client side).
if a module is busy handling the request (e.g., long-running
On 12/17/2005 06:30 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 17, 2005, at 11:32 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
[..cut..]
I still think that having this http specific error mode
hidden within the core output filter is misguided. Instead,
a specific http output filter is, imo, a better place.
17 matches
Mail list logo
