Jim Jagielski wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Using the result of your ideas and the explaintions now I have mod_proxy
that uses the scoreboard via a "scoreboard" provider ;-)
Find enclosed the code.
Just one comment off the top of my head: this seems to confuse what
is the "actua
From: Trent Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The only C#/.NET webapp I care about is dotnetcharting which worked
> flawlessly right off the bat.
Crap, I just tried Dundas Enterprise Charting and that works fine too.
Just when we thought we'd be stuck with Java-based charting products
(none of w
Hi,
I have asked similar question before and looking for solution sticked with
Apache 2.x codebase only. Some replied to take a look at mod_proxy_http and
mod_include module as they do the exact thing. However, it is complicated
and hard to understand up to my knowledge about Apache internal.
I
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please cast your +/- 1's to release
mod_aspdotnet-2.x.0.2004-source.zip
> (along with associated binaries ...2.0.0.2004.msi and
...2.2.0.2004.msi,
> one corresponding to 2.0.44 and later, the other to 2.2.2 and later).
+1
I tried the 2.x.0
On Friday 14 July 2006 00:46, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
OK, I have a fix that appears to work. Mostly.
Well, it fixes the problem reported. This was working with
2.2.2, and I attach a patch against that.
> Nick Kew wrote:
> > I had in mind to fix this tonight. But it's too complex to get rig
Jess Holle wrote:
So what's the story with IPv6 on Windows?
Are there some versions of Windows which always support it, but the
headers we use for Windows don't detect this at build time?
No, the version of winsock2 and ws2_32 .dll files either do or do not
support IPv6, so its been built so
Marcin Zawadzki/GlobalVanet.com wrote:
when you repair this problem, in which version?
Marcin, if you continued this dialog on [EMAIL PROTECTED] where you
originally reported it, the dev team would be quite a bit more likely
to engage in constructive dialog. I have no issue with discrete vuln
Nick Kew wrote:
I had in mind to fix this tonight. But it's too complex to get right
late at night after a long day and a couple of glasses of wine.
A look at it suggests we have a bug in ap_directory_walk
affecting all versions. The "cached dir walk" optimisation at
lines 555-583 (Trunk) is l
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
>
> Using the result of your ideas and the explaintions now I have mod_proxy
> that uses the scoreboard via a "scoreboard" provider ;-)
> Find enclosed the code.
>
Just one comment off the top of my head: this seems to confuse what
is the "actual" scoreboard and what
On Thursday 13 July 2006 22:57, Robert Ionescu wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: niq
> > Date: Thu Jul 13 12:00:26 2006
> > New Revision: 421686
> > Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml
> > +ProxyErrorOverride Off
>
> Just a trivial think: Shouldn't that be
> ProxyP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Thu Jul 13 12:00:26 2006
New Revision: 421686
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml
+ProxyErrorOverride Off
Just a trivial think: Shouldn't that be
ProxyPassInterpolateEnv Off?
--
Robert
Brian Akins wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
If this is data that needs to be accessed from "non-proxy" modules
then yes, I agree.
A basic API could look like. By worker, I am thinking about the mpm
sense, not the proxy sense. I guess "slot" may be a better term:
/*used for ap_scoreboard_do
Brian Akins wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Having some external (or even internal) process update
> > a slot that isn't "its own" is dangerous. And the required
> > locking would be slow.
>
> In my own hacked proxy, an external healthchecker and the proxy share a
> piece of shared memory th
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 10:47:15AM -0500, Jess Holle wrote:
So what's the story with IPv6 on Windows?
Works fine in every version of windows since 2000, although 2000 itself
needs a kit and patching installed.
Great. That covers all versions
Brian Akins wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Having some external (or even internal) process update
a slot that isn't "its own" is dangerous. And the required
locking would be slow.
In my own hacked proxy, an external healthchecker and the proxy share
a piece of shared memory that is "read-only
Brian Akins wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
With such an interface you assume only one process will access to one
slot... That is what the scoreboard allows.
Allowing updates from different proccesses on the same slot.
Should we have an ap_slot_read_look() and an ap_slot_unlock() for that?
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Having some external (or even internal) process update
a slot that isn't "its own" is dangerous. And the required
locking would be slow.
In my own hacked proxy, an external healthchecker and the proxy share a
piece of shared memory that is "read-only" by apache and read-wr
On Jul 13, 2006, at 11:55 AM, Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
With such an interface you assume only one process will access to
one slot... That is what the scoreboard allows.
Allowing updates from different proccesses on the same slot.
Should we have an ap_slot_read_look() and an ap_slot_unlock()
On Jul 13, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Brian Akins wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1. For example, a memcached based scoreboard would be
pretty cool ;)
maybe in "mod_scoreboard" it may use a provider mechanism to
actually implement the scoreboard.
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 10:47:15AM -0500, Jess Holle wrote:
> So what's the story with IPv6 on Windows?
Works fine in every version of windows since 2000, although 2000 itself
needs a kit and patching installed.
> Are there some versions of Windows which always support it, but the
> headers we u
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
With such an interface you assume only one process will access to one
slot... That is what the scoreboard allows.
Allowing updates from different proccesses on the same slot.
Should we have an ap_slot_read_look() and an ap_slot_unlock() for that?
No. we don't have su
Brian Akins wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
If this is data that needs to be accessed from "non-proxy" modules
then yes, I agree.
A basic API could look like. By worker, I am thinking about the mpm
sense, not the proxy sense. I guess "slot" may be a better term:
/*used for ap_scoreboard_do
So what's the story with IPv6 on Windows?
Are there some versions of Windows which always support it, but the
headers we use for Windows don't detect this at build time?
Or...?
We bundle our own Apache builds for a number of Windows OS levels and
have customers who really want IPv6... I don
hi,
I use apacher 2.0. I set the document root as
".../web".
Anything ending in .html can be public. However, the
folder within this directory are not public, although
I set the mode to 755.
Canbody can help me?
yao
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam
Hi Jorge,
I am on just plain ole Windows XP Pro.
Since we last communicated I downloaded Visual Studio 2005
Express and the Windows Platform SDK and
have been able to build Apache 2.2.2 inside the IDE, with
IPv6 enabled via the #define in apr.hw. All seems to
be working now. libapr-1.dll,
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Brian Akins wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1. For example, a memcached based scoreboard would be
pretty cool ;)
maybe in "mod_scoreboard" it may use a provider mechanism to actually
implement the scoreboard. Maybe have an ap_scoreboard_create_ex where
you
Hi all,
I found that there is no option to override the Expires header with
mod_expires. Especially when you use apache (with mod_cache) as a
reverse proxy it can be very useful to be able to override the expires
headers. I've created a patch for mod_expires for the 2.2.x branch
(trunk is similar)
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Yeah, that's what I was thinking as well!
default could just use apr_shm.
--
Brian Akins
Chief Operations Engineer
Turner Digital Media Technologies
Brian Akins wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> >
> > +1. For example, a memcached based scoreboard would be
> > pretty cool ;)
> >
>
> maybe in "mod_scoreboard" it may use a provider mechanism to actually
> implement the scoreboard. Maybe have an ap_scoreboard_create_ex where
> you could e
Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1. For example, a memcached based scoreboard would be
pretty cool ;)
maybe in "mod_scoreboard" it may use a provider mechanism to actually
implement the scoreboard. Maybe have an ap_scoreboard_create_ex where
you could explicitly name a provider.
--
Brian Akins
Chi
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Brian Akins wrote:
> >
> > Thoughts. Somthing very similar to this is used by several very busy
> > web sites...
> >
>
> +1. For example, a memcached based scoreboard would be
> pretty cool ;)
>
I meant capable not necessarily "based"
--
==
Brian Akins wrote:
>
> Thoughts. Somthing very similar to this is used by several very busy
> web sites...
>
+1. For example, a memcached based scoreboard would be
pretty cool ;)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PR
Jim Jagielski wrote:
If this is data that needs to be accessed from "non-proxy" modules
then yes, I agree.
A basic API could look like. By worker, I am thinking about the mpm
sense, not the proxy sense. I guess "slot" may be a better term:
/*used for ap_scoreboard_do. mem is the memory as
On Jul 12, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Brian Akins wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Hi,
I am still trying to replace the scoreboard by shared memory to store
the shared information of the workers, I am now thinking to get
this by
adding modules like the "prototype" I have enclosed (that is a patch
a
Binary looks good on 2.0.58 - runs Windows Server Update Services with
zero problems. Because I'm roughly 1 km from my test machine (and
will remain so until July 27), I haven't gotten around to testing it on
2.2.2, but I believe there will be no problems on 2.2.x. Can't compile
source either,
when you repair this problem, in which version?
Marcin Zawadzki, http://ftims.pl/~marcin/
GPG: 4096D/81DFA928 6C5C F525 8CAA 2A20 B878 C248 08FE 060C 81DF A928
Nick Kew napisał(a):
> I had in mind to fix this tonight. But it's too complex to get right
> late at night after a long day and a co
36 matches
Mail list logo
