On 17/08/2006, at 10:55 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 8/16/06, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have more than one version of Python installed?
Nope. I just have Python from /usr/bin/python. Nothing special.
Strange.
What does your LINKFORSHARED variable have? See
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 8/17/06, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, dist/setup.py in mod_python source contains:
...
But I think this was a workaround for older version of Mac OS X.
What is the actual error you are getting when building?
Um, how are you building?
Per
Jim Gallacher wrote ..
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 8/17/06, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, dist/setup.py in mod_python source contains:
...
But I think this was a workaround for older version of Mac OS X.
What is the actual error you are getting when building?
Justin Erenkrantz wrote ..
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:08:48PM -0400, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
and it just goes haywire.
You are going to have to explain 'haywire' by posting up the actual error
output from compiler or otherwise.
The extracted values for LINKFORSHARED depends on
Hi all,
I had a working installation of apache 2.2.2 with mod_dbd and
mod_authn_dbd configured. Recently I upgraded to 2.2.3 and the server
crashes with the same backtrace. ( it crashes in apr_hashfunc_default at
tables/apr_hash.c:228 ). Have there been any developments towards
resolving this ?
On Thursday 17 August 2006 14:51, paritosh wrote:
Hi all,
I had a working installation of apache 2.2.2 with mod_dbd and
mod_authn_dbd configured. Recently I upgraded to 2.2.3 and the server
crashes with the same backtrace. ( it crashes in apr_hashfunc_default at
tables/apr_hash.c:228 ).
On 8/17/06, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, dist/setup.py in mod_python source contains:
...
But I think this was a workaround for older version of Mac OS X.
What is the actual error you are getting when building?
Um, how are you building?
Per README, I'm running:
$
Pradeep,
I can't remember if I posted the results of the SSL issue and high CPU usage.
We tracked it to a bug in the solaris driver for the Sun daughter card, some
mutex issue if my memory serves me correctly. Sun confirmed and issued a
patch a while ago. As discussed in the quoted post I did
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/invoking.html.en
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/invoking.html.en?rev=432357r1=432356r2=432357view=diff
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Thu Aug 17 12:41:07 2006
New Revision: 432360
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432360view=rev
Log:
Update docs and transforms
:-(
Please check the data before the commit. The paths are messed up again.
Is there, by any chance, the build
No, it's there. And 'svn up'ed ... There were no errors during the
processing.
=?utf-8?q?Andr=C3=A9_Malo?= wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Thu Aug 17 12:41:07 2006
New Revision: 432360
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432360view=rev
Log:
Update docs and
* Jim Jagielski wrote:
Wah happened? Has the process for updating docs changed?
cd docs/manual
cd build
./build.sh
that should be ok. The process hasn't been changed for months...
Is the build directory up to date? Is it really under manual?
nd
--
Solides und umfangreiches Buch
* Jim Jagielski wrote:
No, it's there. And 'svn up'ed ... There were no errors during the
processing.
Hrm. What OS, perl and java version do you use? (Can't imagine, that it has
to do with it, but...)
nd
--
Real programmers confuse Christmas and Halloween because
DEC 25 = OCT 31. --
=?iso-8859-1?q?Andr=E9_Malo?= wrote:
* Jim Jagielski wrote:
Wah happened? Has the process for updating docs changed?
cd docs/manual
cd build
./build.sh
that should be ok. The process hasn't been changed for months...
Is the build directory up to date? Is it really under
On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:56 PM, André Malo wrote:
* Jim Jagielski wrote:
No, it's there. And 'svn up'ed ... There were no errors during the
processing.
Hrm. What OS, perl and java version do you use? (Can't imagine,
that it has
to do with it, but...)
% java -version
java version
* Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:56 PM, André Malo wrote:
* Jim Jagielski wrote:
No, it's there. And 'svn up'ed ... There were no errors during the
processing.
Hrm. What OS, perl and java version do you use? (Can't imagine,
that it has
to do with it, but...)
% java
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:58:52PM -0400, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
So, agree that it is not good that the malformed argument is getting in
there, but still don't know why it is dying for you unless it is specifically
related to you using Apache from subversion trunk and thus why no one else is
Justin Erenkrantz wrote ..
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 06:58:52PM -0400, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
So, agree that it is not good that the malformed argument is getting
in
there, but still don't know why it is dying for you unless it is
specifically
related to you using Apache from subversion
18 matches
Mail list logo
