[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-202?page=comments#action_12449192
]
Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-202:
-
We seem to be going pretty far down the road with PythonOption and our
new namespace, so I'm inclined to
Graham,
The edit you suggested for the PythonImport test:
assert(map(os.path.normpath, sys.path).count(directory) == 1
works on my Win32 build.
Presumably that change would work on Linux too, yes?
Wanted to let you know.
Thanks,
Jef
- Original Message -
From: Graham Dumpleton
Jeff Robbins wrote ..
re the 'subdir' directory:
I've attached a screenshot from WinZip which I used to extract the .tgz
tarball. I sorted by directory so you can see that WinZip does not show
the
'subdir' directory. Perhaps a flaw in WinZip? In any case, I didn't
knowingly delete
Try follow these instructions:
http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2006-September/022092.html
If these are correct, they probably should be put in the source code if they
aren't already.
Graham
Jeff Robbins wrote ..
re: building on Win32
I tried using setup.py but even once I
Graham,
I couldn't find a WinZip option that controls this. It must be a bug in its
tar support, since I know it supports empty native windows directories just
fine.
- Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: python-dev list
Graham,
These instructions are not sufficient. The apache environment I have on
windows has include files in apachesr/include but also in
apachesrc/srclib/apr/include, apachesrc/srclib/apr-iconv/include, and
apachesrc/srclib/apr-util/include
Setting the APACHESRC environmental per the
Jeff Robbins wrote ..
Graham,
These instructions are not sufficient. The apache environment I have on
windows has include files in apachesr/include but also in
apachesrc/srclib/apr/include, apachesrc/srclib/apr-iconv/include, and
apachesrc/srclib/apr-util/include
Setting the APACHESRC
Guys,First of all sorry for not intervening in the discussion earlier, I haven't had much time for mod_python development lately (hell, not much time for anything except working). The build procedure quoted by Graham at
http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2006-September/022092.html
Indeed, the APACHESRC variable has a slightly misleading name, since it doesn't need the full blown source installation. When building mod_python I'm using a stock Win32 Apache 2.0 or 2.2 binary build downloaded from
http://httpd.apache.org/, not a source distribution. It may or may not work with
Nicolas,
I had a binary (with SSL support) from http://www.apachelounge.com/. That
one has no include folder so I fell back to using a source copy. Which I
built but the build doesn't consolidate the include files. I'm downloading
the apache.org win32 binary and will try again with that.
That is probably reasonable as late in Apache 2.0.X releases and in Apache
2.2.X they changed from version 0.0.9 of Apache runtime library to 1.0.2 (or
something like that). Thus, they are probably naming the libraries differently.
Looks like we need to do some work on that script to auto detect
Yeah, the 2.2 version needs to tweak setup.py. We should include some kinf of auto-detection of the 2.2 version and act accordingly.Glad to hear that you've succeeded in building mod_python.Regards,Nicolas
2006/11/13, Jeff Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nicolas,
I downloaded the stock 2.2.3
Jeff Robbins wrote ..
Graham,
I couldn't find a WinZip option that controls this. It must be a bug in
its
tar support, since I know it supports empty native windows directories
just
fine.
It may well be a bug. At:
http://dsd.lbl.gov/firefish/install.html
it warns:
Due too an
Hi all,
I used to know the trick, I think, but can't remember. I want to code my
application to be smart about whether it's on a system that can use
mod_perl2/apreq, or if I have to use CGI. I 've code my app to use CGI
successfully, but would like to keep the code that I worked to get apreq
Brian McQueen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do believe it has to do with my handling of the brigade, but I see
nothing suspicious. The data is parsed with apreq_body. On a
successful parse I get the pointer to the upload brigade from the
parsed parameter, and I pass that pointer to a
I am due to send a report for the HTTP server project to the ASF
board this Monday, so if you have anything you would like me to
send along then now is a good time to speak up.
Below is what I have so far.
Roy
=
Apache HTTP Server Project
Status report for 15 November
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I am personally +0 on the idea, but my only reservation is that
we have too many eggs in one basket already. One of these days,
some kind soul will have the energy to build a CPAN-like module
registry and distribution mechanism.
We talked about this in good detail back
Sander Temme wrote:
On Nov 12, 2006, at 12:50 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
FWIW, mod_mbox, which you listed as dormant, has had more commits
in the last 6 months than the 1.3.x branch.
I think the big difference is that millions of people are using 1.3
and we do formal security
On 11/12/06, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a work-in-progress patch, integrating CLuence[1] as a full text
search engine for mod_mbox.
+1 (concept). Since lucene4c isn't going anywhere soon, it makes
sense to look at other integration avenues.
Bonus points if you remove the
On 11/12/06, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, mod_mbox, which you listed as dormant, has had more commits
in the last 6 months than the 1.3.x branch.
BFD, when was the last time people reviewed them? When did it release?
I am more than happy to change the status when the status
On 11/12/06, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|-- mod_python(active, four committers)
It's probably time to spin off mod_python to its own TLP. They've
survived Grisha's (temporary) departure and they're making forward
progress. I'll volunteer to continue watching
Paul Querna wrote:
Successful CPAN-like systems were mostly started back when package
management was an enormous pain. It still is on some platforms
*cough*solaris*cough*, but they are generally the exception these days.
Also, in almost every case CPAN-style systems focus on one language,
I am having major problems with my httpd growing on POSTs. Is there
some finalization of cleanup or apreq_handle_release kind of a thing
that missed out on? I can't see any source for the leaks. Everything
is coming from req-pool, so any allocs should be transient. There is
no leak until I
Brian McQueen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am having major problems with my httpd growing on POSTs. Is there
some finalization of cleanup or apreq_handle_release kind of a thing
that missed out on? I can't see any source for the leaks. Everything
is coming from req-pool, so any allocs
I do believe it has to do with my handling of the brigade, but I see
nothing suspicious. The data is parsed with apreq_body. On a
successful parse I get the pointer to the upload brigade from the
parsed parameter, and I pass that pointer to a function, which gets a
file handle and does
A while back, I wrote to the list about this also. Joe and some others
sent me some example code that didn't leak buckets. At the time, I
thought I the clean code was still leaking a bit, however, months later,
with no processes having serious troubles, I now suspect that my own
individual
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
27 matches
Mail list logo
