For defect log assignment
-
Key: MODPYTHON-242
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-242
Project: mod_python
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Jun
for defect log assignment
--
This message is
Thanks Nick!
I am actually reading your book. Will your
example on Thread Safety (4.5.1) work (setup the pool
in init_child hook with thread mutex)? I do not need
a global mutex, right? I have not read the late
chapters yet.
With Regards,
John
--- Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
I have a module for 2.2x, and have some config
settings like
IfModule my_module
...
MyName foo
...
/IfModule
and I can get the configurations per the AP_INIT_TAKEx
macro. However, when I compiled my module against
apache 2.0.61, my functions for setting the parameters
are
-1 from me (if that counts.)
Using ProxyPass should be fine for 95% of the use cases??
ProxyPass /cnn http://www.cnn.com/
!--#include virtual=/cnn/WORLD/index.html --
--
Brian Akins
Chief Operations Engineer
Turner Digital Media Technologies
I put out a patchset a few months ago to support UDP in trunk and 2.2.x
branches of httpd (for a mod_dns protocol module that we're currently
in the process of releasing to the public). The patchset only works for
the unix flavor of APR and the prefork MPM at the moment (I'm sure if it
gets
Issac Goldstand wrote:
The same patchset can be used for 2.2.x branch pretty much as is with
the single addition of backporting the apr_socket_sendto function from
trunk (it's broken in the APR that ships with 2.2.x)
We agree that's true - have you looked at apr 1.2.x branch lately? A week
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Nice. A cursory look appears to match what I have.
I also dug up another nugget - a complete patch against httpd-2.2.6 for
the UDP support (excluding only the APR recvfrom issue) - I thought I
had it lying around somewhere. I included two; one with and one without
the
[removed modperl cc]
+1 That's why the original patchset was prepared against trunk. The
backport in my previous mail is more for getting feedback from
early-adopters...
Issac
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Nice. A cursory look appears to match what I have.
I also
Akins, Brian wrote:
-1 from me (if that counts.)
Using ProxyPass should be fine for 95% of the use cases??
ProxyPass /cnn http://www.cnn.com/
!--#include virtual=/cnn/WORLD/index.html --
yes.
if you:
a. have a static small number of hosts
b. those hosts don't change often
if either of
