There are main server_rec structure for main server and one server_rec
for each Virtual Host.
So in child_init you should walk all of them:
while (s) {
do_smth();
s = s-next;
}
One of these should keep initialized structure.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:05 PM, lusob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am sending this again hoping someone would respond.
Thanks in advance.
Jason
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Jason Fister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello all,
In my apache module, I receive, process and return large amounts of data.
The size of the data could be as large as 100's of
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:56:07 +0300
Harold J. Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How it works today: there are 3 types of request: light, medium and
heavy.
We will need 2 pools of threads. One for handling light requests,
and one for medium/heavy.
That sounds rather like a new MPM.
The light
Hi,
Has anyone tried this http://sam.zoy.org/writings/programming/gprof.html; ?
-Paras
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Paras Fadte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to profile apache 2.0.55 using Gprof by compiling
it with -g -pg option.The mpm used is worker.
Background: When a query string doesn't have key/value pairs, the
query string is tokenized on the '+' character and the values are sent
as argv to the CGI script.
It looks like a change to discard null tokens snuck in along with a
suexec patch, r87905 (look for strcmp)
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Background: When a query string doesn't have key/value pairs, the
query string is tokenized on the '+' character and the values are sent
as argv to the CGI script.
It looks like a change to discard null tokens snuck in
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fix in trunk for sure.
For the life of 2.2.x, I suspect that the same fix will leave more users
helped than hurt, with both numbers small. (If paralyzed by fear of
regression, respect build flag such as
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008 15:36
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_cgid doesn't pass null arguments on command line
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Eric Covener
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Background: When a
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008 15:36
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_cgid doesn't pass null arguments on command line
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Eric Covener
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/24/2008 07:09 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008 15:36
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_cgid doesn't pass null arguments on command line
mod_cgi works fine though
Hi,
On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Joe Orton wrote:
when compiled with gcc 4.3 on Sparc under Linux, Apache 2.2.9
sometimes crashes with SIGBUS in the ssl shmcb code.
Adding __attribute__((__noinline__)) (which is already present in
ssl_scache_shmcb.c for the memset call) to the memcpy
On 07/24/2008 09:32 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1, but who is behaving correctly currently mod_cgi or mod_cgid?
The BNF from Ken's CGI RFC site seems to support the 1.3/mod_cgi
interpretation (++ results in null strings
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/24/2008 09:32 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1, but who is behaving correctly currently mod_cgi or mod_cgid?
The BNF from Ken's CGI RFC site
On Jul 24, 2008, at 2:18 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 07/24/2008 09:32 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Ruediger Pluem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1, but who is behaving correctly currently mod_cgi
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Background: When a query string doesn't have key/value pairs, the
query string is tokenized on the '+' character and the values are sent
as argv to the CGI script.
I just stumbled onto this old PR:
15 matches
Mail list logo
