pqf wrote:
Sorry for the delay, I have track down all patches base on my ChangeLog
( I keep my mail archive), so here is my brief:
Minor patches
...Ignore here, I attach a file to show every modification to
every ChangeLog entry. (If anyone think any change is major, please
let me know)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Pranav Desai wrote:
>
>> Yeah, the application changes are restricted to a few lines. I believe
>> you mean the connect_backend() and not the proxy_connect module for
>> the CONNECT method ?
>
> I did yes, sorry.
>
> If this can be made avai
Marc Noirot wrote:
> It has very few dependencies, and seems to be used by large projects,
> notably KDE, and interestingly for the ASF, for the Windows build of PCRE.
> The PCRE's CMakeLists.txt is IMHO a good starting point to understand
> various points of interest for a powerful Windows build s
On Dec 19, 2008, at 1:14 PM, Marc Noirot wrote:
If such a thing would be done, what would be in your opinion a good
starting point in the Apache repository ? (2.3.0-alpha ? the current
2.2 branch ? trunk ?)
Trunk.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4
On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:16 PM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Also note that the x64 versions of windows do run 32-bit binaries
without a problem.
More bits is, of course, better but I agree that it does not always
make sense to run 64bits, even on a 64bits capable platform.
I've been providing x
Jorge Schrauwen wrote :
It would be awsome to have a build platform thats cross platform like
ant but for c(++) I'm not sure that exists though. Never look.
As I have mentioned before, the CMake project seems to be what is needed
in that situation, as this software, like autoconf, performs v
Also note that the x64 versions of windows do run 32-bit binaries without a
problem.
I've been providing x64 binaries of httpd 2.2 because people want them.
I've moved from running windows on my servers to running linux. Even an old
128mb, P3 800mhz will run linux + httpd without a hitch.
I also
bing swen wrote:
>
> As made clear sometime earlier, Windows 2008 R2 will only have 64-bit
> versions. The clock is ticking
Has built fine (with edits) from command line without visual studio,
and .sln's won't be the sole mechanism as long as I have a veto;
1) MS needlessly introduces breaking c
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote
>
> .dsw+.dsp lets us provide everyone with a makefiles and Makefile.win that
> works ***everywhere***. If you insist on a GUI, there is one extra step
> for Visual Studio 2002 (.NET) - Visual Studio 2008 users. But would you
> like that we provide you a Visual Studio
2008-12-18 01:09 ed napisał(a):
> Does anyone know if the information at
>
> http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr/0.9
>
> is available in a printable format for reading off paper? I generally
> find things easier to read like that. Or does anyone have know of a
> resource that's similar and easy to rea
On Dec 16, 2008, at 4:30 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/16/2008 10:08 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Chris Darroch wrote:
pqf wrote:
For the moment, though, I think we're just waiting for some
feedback from other httpd developers and especially those with
some experience of the Incub
11 matches
Mail list logo
