Re: svn commit: r240 - /release/httpd/

2010-12-21 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 12/21/2010 1:05 PM, j...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jim > Date: Tue Dec 21 19:05:03 2010 > New Revision: 240 > > Log: > 2.3.8 is old baby But live... the sequence should be... svn mv dev/ -> release/ (goes live immediately) ... wait 24 hrs or so for mirrors to catch up ... svn commit site/

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha

2010-12-21 Thread Rainer Jung
On 21.12.2010 19:26, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 12/21/2010 12:11 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: I just notified Bill about being missing from the files/ldap. This is now fixed, sorry Rainer! No prob, thanks for fixing! Regards, Rainer

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha

2010-12-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Dec 21, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 21.12.2010 19:00, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> As such, I'm guessing I can close the vote with at least >> 3 (binding) +1 votes. > > Isn't it 4? You, Eric, Stefan and me? I know I'm not listed in the file but > was added to the PMC in October.

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha

2010-12-21 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 12/21/2010 12:11 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > I just notified Bill about being missing from the files/ldap. This is now fixed, sorry Rainer!

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha

2010-12-21 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 12/21/2010 12:00 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > See that's the rub: to get the untarred dirs to have that > name, I need to reroll the whole thing. I'd prefer not > having to do so at this point. I agree, if you are willing to rename the download. To fix the internal labels in the md5 and sha1

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha

2010-12-21 Thread Rainer Jung
On 21.12.2010 19:00, Jim Jagielski wrote: As such, I'm guessing I can close the vote with at least 3 (binding) +1 votes. Isn't it 4? You, Eric, Stefan and me? I know I'm not listed in the file but was added to the PMC in October. I just notified Bill about being missing from the files/ldap.

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha

2010-12-21 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 12/21/2010 9:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> >> On Dec 20, 2010, at 6:43 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> >>> On 12/16/2010 6:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha test tarballs are available at: http

[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha

2010-12-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Dec 21, 2010, at 12:34 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 12/21/2010 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:16 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> >>> On 12/16/2010 6:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha test tarballs are available at:

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha

2010-12-21 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 12/21/2010 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:16 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > >> On 12/16/2010 6:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha test tarballs are available at: >>> >>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >>> >>> Please vote on whether

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha

2010-12-21 Thread Rainer Jung
On 21.12.2010 00:43, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 12/16/2010 6:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha test tarballs are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please vote on whether to release as 2.3.10-alpha. -1 on httpd-2.3.10-deps. pcre is missing, al

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha

2010-12-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:16 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 12/16/2010 6:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha test tarballs are available at: >> >> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >> >> Please vote on whether to release as 2.3.10-alpha. > > +1 to httpd-2.3.10-a

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha

2010-12-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Dec 20, 2010, at 6:43 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > >> On 12/16/2010 6:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha test tarballs are available at: >>> >>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >>> >>> Please vote on

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha

2010-12-21 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 12/16/2010 6:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha test tarballs are available at: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > Please vote on whether to release as 2.3.10-alpha. +1 to httpd-2.3.10-alpha.tar.gz/bz2 (to the contents of httpd-2.3.10.tar.gz - but -1 to t

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha

2010-12-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Dec 20, 2010, at 6:43 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 12/16/2010 6:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha test tarballs are available at: >> >> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >> >> Please vote on whether to release as 2.3.10-alpha. > > -1 on httpd-2.3.10-de

Re: How Apache httpd is tested after changes?

2010-12-21 Thread Eldar Gaynetdinov
Thank you. --- On Tue, 12/21/10, Issac Goldstand wrote: > From: Issac Goldstand > Subject: Re: How Apache httpd is tested after changes? > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2010, 2:24 AM > Tests are performed using the > Apache::Test perl framework, available on > CPAN.  Th

Re: How Apache httpd is tested after changes?

2010-12-21 Thread Issac Goldstand
Tests are performed using the Apache::Test perl framework, available on CPAN. The test suite is in subversion at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/test/framework/trunk/ Once you have Apache::Test installed, just run perl Makefile.PL and then issue make test to run the suite. Issac On 21/1

How Apache httpd is tested after changes?

2010-12-21 Thread Eldar Gaynetdinov
Hi. How Apache httpd is tested after changes? I haven't found information about unit tests in httpd. I see few test programs in /test folder, macros for debugging and scripts in .gdbinit but i didn't found information about automatic testing process.