On 2/21/2012 2:44 AM, wr...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Tue Feb 21 08:44:06 2012
> New Revision: 503
>
> Log:
> We are stuck with our Binary ABI graph for the next five years. That doesn't
> seem like much time unless you are a maintainer :)
>
> There's no way on Her Green Earth I'
A couple of thoughts really quick, and we'll take this to the
packagers@ list because I think it is a better fit to that list
(lots of arcane windows details that might actually be interesting
to .depot/.pkg/.rpm maintainers)...
1. Base on now-current Studio 2010 SP1. Because anything else
n
On 2/21/2012 2:58 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> A couple of thoughts really quick, and we'll take this to the
> packagers@ list because I think it is a better fit to that list
> (lots of arcane windows details that might actually be interesting
> to .depot/.pkg/.rpm maintainers)...
>
> 1. Base
This patch should suppress the ~only warning I get when building svn
against httpd-2.4.1:
[[[
Index: include/ap_config.h
===
--- include/ap_config.h (revision 1291669)
+++ include/ap_config.h (working copy)
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@
#defin
On 21.02.2012 09:44, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Feb 21 08:44:06 2012
New Revision: 503
Modified:
dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.txt
Modified: dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
===
On 2/21/2012 3:26 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> - NOTE: Windows users may have problems with Apache httpd 2.4.1 and
>> - SSL. As such, Apache 2.4.x is currently not recommended for
>> - Windows servers.
>> + NOTE to Windows users: AcceptFilter None has replaced
>> DisableWin32Accept
Subversion uses C89 by default, which doesn't defined __STDC_VERSION__.
(ap_config.h accomodates that explicitly.) This causes a fair amount of
warnings, which the following patch should suppress.
(I'm working on the assumption that API consumers are allowed to write
their code in C89.)
[[[
Chec
On 21 Feb 2012, at 10:58 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Sorry I haven't had more cycles to post about this subject, I'm know
> we have a number of third-party windows distributions, and in fact,
> I'd rather this small delay encourage them to jump on the opportunity.
> It's pretty obvious that t
On 2/21/2012 4:08 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> It must be pointed out however that people on Redhat (and derivatives) are
> able to roll their own RPMs for deployment today should they choose to do so
> by following the instructions here:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/platform/rpm.html
On 2/21/2012 4:00 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> (I'm working on the assumption that API consumers are allowed to write
> their code in C89.)
I believe that in 2012 that is a more than fair assumption, go with it.
I'm not sure we have a C99 consensus, although I believe it's past time
that we shou
I see http://ci.apache.org/projects/httpd/trunk/doxygen/, but I feel
I'm overlooking something painfully obvious.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> I see http://ci.apache.org/projects/httpd/trunk/doxygen/, but I feel
> I'm overlooking something painfully obvious.
Well, that's what the 2.4 developer doc references... (from
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/developer/)
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.1 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are
pleased to announce the GA release of version 2.4.1 of the Apache HTTP
Server. This version of Apache HTTP Server is the first GA release of
the new 2.4.x branch.
Apache HTTP Se
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:44 AM, wrote:
> Author: trawick
> Date: Tue Feb 21 13:44:30 2012
> New Revision: 1291781
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1291781&view=rev
> Log:
> generated files from r1291779
> (pick up the navigation update)
Hmmm, not live yet. (This is handled via svnpubs
Well, we did it! 2.4 is a reality!
Congrats and thanks go to everyone who made this happen!
On 21 Feb 2012, at 4:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Well, we did it! 2.4 is a reality!
>
> Congrats and thanks go to everyone who made this happen!
Thanks for the RM :)
The word of the month is now "w00t".
Regards,
Graham
--
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:59 AM, wrote:
> Author: trawick
> Date: Tue Feb 21 14:59:07 2012
> New Revision: 1291829
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1291829&view=rev
> Log:
> generated file from r1291828
>
> Added:
> httpd/site/trunk/docs/security/vulnerabilities_24.html
This is enoug
FYI - I see no notable difference in the W messages with the IBM vacpp
(xlc) v7 compiler using no CFLAGS and CFLAGS='-O2 -qlanglvl=extc99'
"util_expr_eval.c", line 1553.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between types
"const void*" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const void*)" is not
allowed.
"
Hi Infra,
I know there's always to much to do, but any chance we can update
www.apache.org to 2.4.1 now that 2.4 is GA?
AFAIK Joe's latest problem observation with 2.3.16 was fixed in
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1236351&view=rev
before cutting 2.4.1.
Thanks in advance should you find s
Hi,
I have thought about having some relaxed rules for backports until
release of 2.4.2, in order to make fixing the initial bunch of bugs
easier. Something like "very simple bug fixes are CTR, the rest is
RTC". But I haven't found a wording that would actually provide
significant benefit and
With gcc on Debian I see this error ---
/home/daniel/prefix/apache2/include/http_log.h:361:5: warning:
"__STDC_VERSION__" is not defined
unless I force it to C99 mode.
Michael Felt wrote on Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 18:43:34 +:
> FYI - I see no notable difference in the W messages with the IBM
On Tuesday 21 February 2012, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Subversion uses C89 by default, which doesn't defined
> __STDC_VERSION__. (ap_config.h accomodates that explicitly.) This
> causes a fair amount of warnings, which the following patch should
> suppress.
Fixed differently in r1292043, thanks.
On Tuesday 21 February 2012, Michael Felt wrote:
> FYI - I see no notable difference in the W messages with the IBM
> vacpp (xlc) v7 compiler using no CFLAGS and CFLAGS='-O2
> -qlanglvl=extc99'
Hrm. Assigning function pointers to void * is not really portable. Not
sure about the best way to fix t
Stefan Fritsch wrote on Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 22:53:44 +0100:
> On Tuesday 21 February 2012, Michael Felt wrote:
> > FYI - I see no notable difference in the W messages with the IBM
> > vacpp (xlc) v7 compiler using no CFLAGS and CFLAGS='-O2
> > -qlanglvl=extc99'
>
> Hrm. Assigning function pointer
On 2/21/2012 4:03 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Fritsch wrote on Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 22:53:44 +0100:
>> On Tuesday 21 February 2012, Michael Felt wrote:
>>> FYI - I see no notable difference in the W messages with the IBM
>>> vacpp (xlc) v7 compiler using no CFLAGS and CFLAGS='-O2
>>> -qlanglv
On 3/21/2011 9:38 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 21:13, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> On 3/20/2011 7:43 PM, Dan Poirier wrote:
>>> On Sun. 2011-03-20 at 07:47 PM EDT, "William A. Rowe Jr."
>>> wrote:
[1] Note particularly that expat appears to be abandoned, no relea
FYI: complete list attached.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 2/21/2012 4:03 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Stefan Fritsch wrote on Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 22:53:44 +0100:
> >> On Tuesday 21 February 2012, Michael Felt wrote:
> >>> FYI - I see no notable difference in
Looking at the server status on www.apache.org running 2.3.15 one can
see, that about 50% of the async connections are in closing state.
We created AsyncRequestWorkerFactor to control the amount of
overcommitment in terms of connections relative to idle workers we allow
for each process. The f
28 matches
Mail list logo
