Hi,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:01:11AM +0200, Michael Weiser wrote:
A solution might be something like:
ProxyPass / https://www.example.com:12443/ no-sni
ProxyPassReverse / https://www.example.com:12443/ no-sni
, disabling SNI towards the backend server.
Or can I tell the 2.2.14 apache
On 04/16/2012 12:45 PM, Michael Weiser wrote:
that makes mod_ssl put the content of the host header into the sni data
structures instead of the hostname from the URL used in the
ProxyPass(Reverse) configuration itself. This way even name-based
virtual hosts should work behind the reverse
- Original Message -
Author: igalic
Date: Fri Apr 13 07:21:46 2012
New Revision: 1325632
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1325632view=rev
Log:
Introduce Slackware layout.
patch: Frank Gingras
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/config.layout
Can I Back-port this for our
Hi Bing,
you did hit the apr list - I think this should go to the httpd list
instead ... ;-)
Am 16.04.2012 14:32, schrieb Bing Swen:
After building the httpd-2.4.2 x64 binaries with VS2010, I encountered a
runtime error in the module libhttpd.dll, which alerts that a heap corruption
- Original Message -
This is NOT the list for starting OS wars on.
Could you please point me to the correct list for that
kind of thing? (:
i
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D
+1
- Original Message -
With 3+ +1 (binding) votes and no -1s, I call the vote CLOSED
and PASSED.
Thx to all testers!
On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
at the usual place:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:35 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 4/9/2012 11:30 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
The patch does have value to a limited number of applications. I even went
as far as to put caviats in the docs, and a see-docs note to the directive
cmd
On 4/16/2012 8:10 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
- Original Message -
This is NOT the list for starting OS wars on.
Could you please point me to the correct list for that
kind of thing? (:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AOperating_system_advocacy
That's been asked before ;-P
On 4/16/2012 8:16 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:35 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 4/9/2012 11:30 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
The patch does have value to a limited number of applications. I even went
as far as to put caviats in the docs, and a
Hi there,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 01:45:16PM +0200, Peter Sylvester wrote:
that makes mod_ssl put the content of the host header into the sni data
structures instead of the hostname from the URL used in the
ProxyPass(Reverse) configuration itself. This way even name-based
virtual hosts
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Michael Weiser
mich...@weiser.dinsnail.net wrote:
Hi there,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 01:45:16PM +0200, Peter Sylvester wrote:
that makes mod_ssl put the content of the host header into the sni data
structures instead of the hostname from the URL used in the
If the SSL-certificate is the same for all named vhosts configured for the given
IP-address/port-number combination, why can not the vhosts have different
DocumentRoots and other settings?
Thank you. Yours,
-mi
Am 16.04.2012 17:34, schrieb Mikhail T.:
If the SSL-certificate is the same for all named vhosts configured for the
given IP-address/port-number
combination, why can not the vhosts have different DocumentRoots and other
settings?
because SSL was misdesigned years ago and the Host-Header
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
If the SSL-certificate is the same for all named vhosts configured for the
given IP-address/port-number combination, why can not the vhosts have
different DocumentRoots and other settings?
Thank you. Yours,
-mi
On 16.04.2012 11:40, Tom Evans wrote:
They can. Excerpt from my httpd.conf:
Your excerpt does not show different DocumentRoots -- nor any other settings...
Could you show more contents? What is the Apache version you are using? In all
my attempts, Apache a) issues a pointless warning about
No, this does not answer my question. In my scenario the SSL-certificate is
the same for all vhosts concerned. So Apache could use that certificate to
establish the SSL connection, and then parse the Host:-header to determine,
which group of other (non-SSL) settings to apply to the request.
On 16.04.2012 11:55, Eric Covener wrote:
Got a pointer to your configuration?
Well, the real one I was designing now uses a work-around (single vhost with
mod_rewrite examining the Host-header and picking the proper subdirectore). Here
is a mock one, that I'd rather be using -- instead of
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
On 16.04.2012 11:40, Tom Evans wrote:
They can. Excerpt from my httpd.conf:
Your excerpt does not show different DocumentRoots -- nor any other
settings... Could you show more contents? What is the Apache version
Without a NameVirtualHost directive this cannot work as you intend.
Add NameVirtualHost *:433
Regards
Rüdiger
From: Mikhail T. [mailto:mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com]
Sent: Montag, 16. April 2012 18:07
To: dev@httpd.apache.org; cove...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Why aren't name-based vhosts not working
Are you sure that your client supports SNI?
On 16/04/2012 19:21, Tom Evans wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
On 16.04.2012 11:40, Tom Evans wrote:
They can. Excerpt from my httpd.conf:
Your excerpt does not show different DocumentRoots --
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Issac Goldstand mar...@beamartyr.net wrote:
Are you sure that your client supports SNI?
This is not reliant on SNI.
Cheers
Tom
On 16.04.2012 12:24, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
Without a NameVirtualHost directive this cannot work as you intend.
Add NameVirtualHost *:433
I see... I thought, I'm already giving Apache all the information it needs,
though (with ServerAlias directives)... But if spelling-out the
Hi Tom,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 04:02:00PM +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
This could be a side-effect of ProxyPreserveHost On since only with
ProxyPreserveHost On does it make any sense anyways. With
ProxyPreserveHost Off, the SNI data should contain the hostname from the
ProxyPassReverse
23 matches
Mail list logo
