Original Message
Subject:svn commit: r1386726 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk:
docs/log-message-tags/next-number modules/slotmem/mod_slotmem_shm.c
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:19:45 GMT
From: j...@apache.org
Author: jim
Date: Mon Sep 17 17:19:44 2012
New Revision: 1386726
I have mod_proxy at the point where it will persist changes
to all httpd.conf created balancers/works through restarts.
It still doesn't (yet) persist *added* workers (or balancers)
though.
Will likely commit those as an incremental step in the right
direction.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 18. September 2012 13:27
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: mod_proxy and restart persist
I have mod_proxy at the point where it will persist changes
to all httpd.conf created balancers/works through
The expectation is that whatever is within the shared-memory running
config at the time of the restart is the config the admin wants restored.
yes, it does mean that if the admin willy-nilly uses a combination
of 'vi httpd.conf; apachectl restart' and the balancer-manager
then there is a rathole
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski
Sent: Dienstag, 18. September 2012 14:34
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: mod_proxy and restart persist
The expectation is that whatever is within the shared-memory running
config at the time of the restart is the config the admin
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 08:00:00AM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote:
I have committed an improved version in r1385214 (in particular, more
tweaking was required to properly handle support/ab, which can't make
use of MOD_CFLAGS etc.). Reviews, further testing and feedback welcome.
Looks good to me,
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:57:21AM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I think this message is outdated and should be fixed. For 2.4.x and trunk its
even worse because it points to the no
longer existing apr-util/trunk.
Anyone opposed if I clean this up in the following way:
2.2.x: branches/1.4.x
And here... +1
On Sep 18, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:57:21AM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I think this message is outdated and should be fixed. For 2.4.x and trunk
its even worse because it points to the no
longer existing apr-util/trunk.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Kaspar Brand httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch wrote:
On 16.09.2012 08:00, Kaspar Brand wrote:
I have committed an improved version in r1385214
Um, make that read r1385216. I left out the acinclude.m4 changes in the
first attempt, unfortunately.
OK, I just checked it
Original Message
Subject:svn commit: r1387110 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES
docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml include/ap_mmn.h
modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h
modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012
On Sep 18, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Rüdiger Plüm ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c?rev=1387110r1=1387109r2=1387110view=diff
==
---
Hi all,
I did make some changes to the download page for the NetWare binaries
with this commit:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1384562view=rev
and shortly after the commit I saw the message from the buildbot below;
however I cant see that these changes did make it to the download page;
what
Hi Jim,
your commit below introduced a comment close tag which seems misplaced ...
I did just remove this with r1387389 - if you intended to comment out
something there then please review ...
Gün.
Am 18.09.2012 00:26, schrieb j...@apache.org:
Author: jim
Date: Mon Sep 17 22:26:28 2012
New
13 matches
Mail list logo
