Re: How to fail in case of an error

2013-06-20 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:10 PM, markus.k...@nokia.com wrote: Hi, what is the recommended way for a module to fail the start of Apache, if the module cannot be started (e.g. due to a configuration problem)? It depends. If you know it has failed in a directive configuration handler, you can

[PATCH] document apxs -p option

2013-06-20 Thread Jan Kaluža
Hi, attached is really small patch against trunk documenting apxs -p option. Regards, Jan Kaluza Index: docs/manual/programs/apxs.xml === --- docs/manual/programs/apxs.xml (revision 1494884) +++ docs/manual/programs/apxs.xml

ab-mruby is a HTTP Benchmark and Test Framework

2013-06-20 Thread MATSUMOTO Ryosuke
Hi, all I have implemented ab-mruby. ab-mruby is a HTTP Benchmark and Test Framework based on ab. ab-mruby embedded mruby into ab command. mruby is a embeddable scripting language like lua. You can test and configure ab command options dynamically by mruby script.

Re: eventopt observations

2013-06-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
Thx for the feedback! Comments inline. On Jun 19, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: While testing the new APR 1.4.8 I ran the httpd test suite on trunk, the first time since long. 1) eventopt didn't run on SLES 10 32 Bit

Re: eventopt observations

2013-06-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jun 20, 2013, at 7:56 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Thx for the feedback! Comments inline. On Jun 19, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: 2) include.t I noticed sporadic test failures for include.t when checking the file time. The

Re: [PATCH] Fix LDAPReferrals off

2013-06-20 Thread Eric Covener
Do you think we should tolerate an error turning referrals off? On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, currently LDAPReferrals off does not disable LDAPReferrals feature. Default

Re: [PATCH] document apxs -p option

2013-06-20 Thread Eric Covener
thanks, committed to trunk in r1494952. On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, attached is really small patch against trunk documenting apxs -p option. Regards, Jan Kaluza -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com

Re: [PATCH] Fix LDAPReferrals off

2013-06-20 Thread Jan Kaluža
On 06/20/2013 02:25 PM, Eric Covener wrote: Do you think we should tolerate an error turning referrals off? That's good point. I'm not ldap expert, but I would say we should not tolerate that. Admin has to explicitly disable referrals and if he does that, he probably has some reason why to

Re: [PATCH] Fix LDAPReferrals off

2013-06-20 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/20/2013 02:25 PM, Eric Covener wrote: Do you think we should tolerate an error turning referrals off? That's good point. I'm not ldap expert, but I would say we should not tolerate that. Admin has to explicitly

Re: eventopt observations

2013-06-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
I've changed this but still not happy. This issue is that it's still possible for this to fail since it assumes that httpd and the test environ are setup the same regarding locale and timezone, which might not be the case. My idea is to grab what httpd returns, pull the TZ from its response and

Re: [PATCH] Fix LDAPReferrals off

2013-06-20 Thread Jan Kaluža
On 06/20/2013 02:41 PM, Eric Covener wrote: On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/20/2013 02:25 PM, Eric Covener wrote: Do you think we should tolerate an error turning referrals off? That's good point. I'm not ldap expert, but I would say we should

Re: [PATCH] Fix LDAPReferrals off

2013-06-20 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/20/2013 02:41 PM, Eric Covener wrote: On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/20/2013 02:25 PM, Eric Covener wrote: Do you think we should tolerate an error turning referrals

T-24:00:00 to 2.0, 2.2 final tags

2013-06-20 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
Devs, I plan to tag both the 2.0 and 2.2 trees now that they look relatively stable, given that we are a couple weeks beyond the originally discussed 2.0/2.2/2.4 simultaneous release. There is one backport to apply in 2.2 and we had been waiting for Jeff to confirm that the proposed security fix

mod_expires support for negative times

2013-06-20 Thread Igor Galić
Hi folks, today I tried configuring mod_expires to return negative Expires headers to the front-end cache, thereby finding out that ExpiresDefault modification -3 days doesn't work, because it doesn't parse. But supposedly, or so The Internet told me, ExpiresDefault M-259200 does. My

Re: T-24:00:00 to 2.0, 2.2 final tags

2013-06-20 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote: Devs, I plan to tag both the 2.0 and 2.2 trees now that they look relatively stable, given that we are a couple weeks beyond the originally discussed 2.0/2.2/2.4 simultaneous release. There is one backport to

RE: T-24:00:00 to 2.0, 2.2 final tags

2013-06-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Nothing to stall the work, but I'd like to campaign once more for a quick look at the 2.2 backport I have outstanding (which was added to 2.4 already). Cheers -- Daniel Ruggeri Original message From: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net Date: 06/20/2013 4:07 PM