help from cache gurus?

Review please? Didn't want unnecessary churn in svn. http://people.apache.org/~covener/patches/httpd-trunk-cachecontrol.diff (whitespace not included) I think the changing meaning of "exp" over time in that function adds to the confusion, but pre-patch the issue is that we do not give

Re: access control for dynamic hosts

Hello Apache devs, Would anyone have an opinion, please? Although I can just commit the proposed changes, a formal go would be nice. On Sun, 20 Dec 2015, Fabien wrote: Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 09:44:55 +0100 (CET) From: Fabien Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org To: APACHE

Re: [Bug 55808] File integrity verification using MD5 and SHA1

[cross posting @docs => @dev, full thread http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/docs/453401] On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen wrote: > > On 14/01/16 01:19, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> >> as I said earlier, the way you access the >> tarball is not

Re: AddOutputFilterByType in Apache 2.4 inserts filters as AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE

Hi Nick, Am 13.01.2016 22:44, schrieb Nick Kew: PROBLEM DESCRIPTION This is probably worth a bugzilla entry. Done. https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58856 Nick, would you mind to provide some insights on these comments from my initial mail: For setups with both,

Re: Work in progress: mod_proxy Health Check module

> Am 09.01.2016 um 19:18 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > > Here is the general concept: > > The health check itself is done via mod_watchdog, and uses > its callback impl. Each worker will have its own check interval, > which can be changed via the new balancer member directives >

Re: access control for dynamic hosts

Hi Fabien, doesn't it work using Require host with a dyndns name? At least my test was successful. Cheers Mario On 20 December 2015 at 09:44, Fabien wrote: > > Hello folks, > > I have a simple access control use case for which I have not found a clean > solution. > > I want

Re: mod_fcgid and broken doc links

> On Jan 13, 2016, at 12:28 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > > I can see us moving those modules into trunk (not 2.4), retaining the > mmn tests for 2.2 and 2.4 compat, and then deriving an fcgid release > out of trunk/modules/fcgid/. But I'm not clear why we would want

Re: Work in progress: mod_proxy Health Check module

On Dec 30, 2015 4:21 AM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote: > Just a note that I've started committing my mod_proxy health > check module work... it is still a work-in-progress but the > goal is to always ensure that trunk is buildable and usable. > Right now, the module needs to be

Re: help from cache gurus?

I'll have some time over the weekend... > On Jan 14, 2016, at 10:25 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > Review please? Didn't want unnecessary churn in svn. > > http://people.apache.org/~covener/patches/httpd-trunk-cachecontrol.diff > > (whitespace not included) > > I think the

Re: mod_fcgid and broken doc links

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > On Jan 13, 2016, at 12:28 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > > > > I can see us moving those modules into trunk (not 2.4), retaining the > > mmn tests for 2.2 and 2.4 compat, and then deriving an

Re: access control for dynamic hosts

Hello Mario, doesn't it work using Require host with a dyndns name? From the documentation about "Require host ...": "It will do a reverse DNS lookup on the IP address to find the associated hostname, and then do a forward lookup on the hostname to assure that it matches the original IP