On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 06:19:13PM +0200, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 4:36 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >
> > On 6/7/23 1:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > > Hi Giovanni;
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 12:02 AM wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Author: gbechis
> > >> Date: Tue Jun 6 22:02:37
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 07:28:20PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 3/30/23 7:19 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/30/23 7:09 PM, gbec...@apache.org wrote:
> >> Author: gbechis
> >> Date: Thu Mar 30 17:09:09 2023
> >> New Revision: 1908805
> >>
> >> URL:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 08:40:52AM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 05:19:22PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 09:40:49AM -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > On Mar 4, 2022, at 6:17 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 9:05 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>
> >> A question: Would it be easier for all this if we moved to being Github
> >> canon?
> >
> > I think it is
On 12/16/21 15:03, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.52-rc1 as 2.4.52:
> [ ]
On 12/8/21 13:56, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:36:51AM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> Friends of httpd, how do you feel about a release in the next two weeks?
>
> Sounds good to me. We may have fewer people around to test it, but at
> least trying to get a release out is better
On 10/1/21 16:40, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
> Hi, all;
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50:
> [ ]
On 9/10/21 17:23, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
> Hi, all;
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as 2.4.49:
> [ ]
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 10:56:15AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 08:39:17AM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > On 8/28/21 4:00 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 10:07 AM ste...@eissing.org
> > > wrote:
> > >> Related to that, do we exempt "./test" from RTC in
On 7/21/21 10:04 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> I was chasing an unrelated thread about close_notify alerts and
> reminded me -- is it time to change the default for
> HttpProtocolOptions from Allow0.9 to Require1.0?
>
> As the manual says, the requirement was dropped in RFC 7230. It seems
> like the
On 6/25/21 9:15 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> I would like to suggest that we fill a very basic document that shows on
> Github as our security policy.
> Below my proposal for a SECURITY.md :
>
>
> ===
> # Security Policy
>
> ##
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 07:43:51PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 18/05/2021 à 14:57, Giovanni Bechis a écrit :
> > On 5/18/21 1:53 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 01:30:25PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> &
On 5/18/21 1:53 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 01:30:25PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/18/21 11:52 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>>> On 5/17/21 11:36 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>>> Hi, all;
>>>> Please
On 5/17/21 11:36 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarball as 2.4.48:
> [ ] +1: It's not
On 4/22/21 11:25 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarball as 2.4.47:
> [ ] +1: It's not
On 9/10/20 4:14 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 17:43, mailto:gbec...@apache.org>>
> wrote:
>
> Author: gbechis
> Date: Wed Sep 9 14:43:07 2020
> New Revision: 1881590
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1881590=rev
> Log:
> handle headers
On 8/1/20 4:13 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Third time is a charm! Please find below the proposed release tarball
> and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.46:
>
On 7/29/20 5:26 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.45:
> [ ] +1: It's not just
On 6/4/20 9:50 AM, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
>
>
>> Am 04.06.2020 um 09:04 schrieb gbec...@apache.org:
>>
>> Author: gbechis
>> Date: Thu Jun 4 07:04:09 2020
>> New Revision: 1878462
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1878462=rev
>> Log:
>> Add error checks in md_json_readb
>>
>>
On 5/6/20 1:01 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 11:44:37AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
>> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 05:23:23PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>> On 5/4/20 3:49 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
d) SSLRandomSeed. This might have made sense in 1998 but at least with
OpenSSL
On 4/22/20 1:13 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 4/22/20 12:50 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:10 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>
':'
>>>
>>> This one looks special already in ap_resolve_env(), though it's
>>> forbidden in Define so that may be it.
>>
>> I'm afraid ':'
Il 15 aprile 2020 13:36:05 CEST, Yann Ylavic ha scritto:
>On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 1:18 PM Yann Ylavic
>wrote:
>>
>> In this particular patch, setting "rv" and using a single label may
>be
>> an option too. Something like this for each goto:
>>rv = 0|1;
>>goto cleanup;
>> ?
>
>Would look
It reads ok, I think there could be other cases later in the code where
X509_free(issuer) should be called (after if(cinf) IMHO).
Giovanni
On 4/7/20 9:36 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Oops. Reading my merged change, I see that we do not free the "X590 *issuer"
> from line 134,
On 3/26/20 3:50 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.43:
> [ ] +1: It's not just
On 3/17/20 1:39 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are we planing to add sha512 in our release?
> vcpkg (https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg) for example uses sha512 to check
> the files it downloads.
I think we should go that way even if it's not mandatory:
"For new releases, PMCs MUST
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:39:02PM +0100, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>
> Le 26/02/2020 à 18:47, gbec...@apache.org a écrit :
> > Author: gbechis
> > Date: Wed Feb 26 17:47:53 2020
> > New Revision: 1874545
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1874545=rev
> > Log:
> > Avoid
On 2/26/20 5:07 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 errors when compile on fedora31 with configure
> --enable-maintainer-mod. Attached a possible patch, comments?
>
Thanks,
they are both fixed in trunk in 2 separate commits, see
On 2/20/20 8:36 AM, Pluem, Ruediger, Vodafone Group wrote:
>
>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Eric Covener
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2020 17:41
>> An: Apache HTTP Server Development List
>> Betreff: KeepAliveTimeout vs. event issue
>>
>> IIUC event MPM can close
On 2/14/20 6:05 PM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> purely speculative, but does a:
> apr_table_set(headers, "Connection", "close");
>
> around line 812 of md_oscp.c also makes sense?
>
I think it makes absolutely sense.
Giovanni
> CJ
>
> Le 14/02/2020 à 10:38,
30 matches
Mail list logo
