On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 23:29, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 1/8/2012 12:04 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>> on the other side: I've asked me already often if we shouldnt increase the
>> maxchar/line; I
>> believe that would in many cases greatly increase readability ...
>> and honestly: who the heck
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 01:09, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>> Am 30.11.2011 01:51, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
>> > On 11/29/2011 5:30 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>> >> Currently my scripts produces:
>> >>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~sf/error-msg-
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 15:34, Joachim Zobel wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 17:04 -0400, Akins, Brian wrote:
>
>> For filters, etc, not sure we really need buckets in Lua. Maybe just
>> represent them as a table of buffers or something simple like that.
>
> This misses my (admittedly not so impor
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 04:57, Dan Poirier wrote:
> On Tue. 2011-03-15 at 09:08 AM EDT, "Akins, Brian"
> wrote:
>
>> How many people actual run mod_lua (or a derivative/relative) in production?
>> Am I the only one on a "real" site?
>
> I guess the others, if any, aren't reading dev@. And searc
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 08:05, Dan Poirier wrote:
> On Tue. 2011-03-15 at 09:36 AM EDT, HyperHacker wrote:
>
>> I've been eagerly looking forward to a stable mod_lua with which to
>> make my sites. If done well, Lua could replace PHP as the #1 web
>> scripting langu
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 07:08, Akins, Brian wrote:
> On 3/14/11 7:51 PM, "Brian McCallister" wrote:
>
>> I think the right path for this is to shrink the core mod_lua module
>> to be the *minimal* set for integration, and pull all the higher level
>> functionality into a non-core module, which us
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 13:24, dave b wrote:
>> "first the attacker has to find a way to reduce system memory to an
>> almost oom condition"
>> Say, by attacking several httpd threads and/or unrelated processes to
>> get them to eat up memory.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my toaster.
>>
>
> If you know s
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 07:12, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 03 Sep 2010, at 2:37 PM, HyperHacker wrote:
>
>> ...assuming he attacks a single httpd thread, as opposed to say a
>> distributed attack or attack on an unrelated process.
>
> How would a distributed attack be dif
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 03:49, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 03 Sep 2010, at 5:31 AM, dave b wrote:
>
>> Sure ok :)
>> You have no complains from me really here. Just this could be an issue
>> on some platform with some mods potentially :)
>
> In order to understand why it isn't an issue for httpd, yo
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 09:34, Akins, Brian wrote:
> On 6/8/10 8:07 AM, "Dan Poirier" wrote:
>
>> That's a shame. I wonder if another embedded language would do better?
>> E.g. mod_perl, mod_python? They've both been around for a while. I
>> wonder why neither has gotten into the server?
>
> Lua
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 16:25, Sergey Chernyshev
wrote:
> This sounds scary! How do large companies enable gzip then? How many hoops
> do they jump through? sounds like those hoops are in thousands!
> And I don't understand how one company's setup would be different from
> another still, even if si
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:23, wrote:
>
> Let’s suppose this configuration
>
> |Server1| <- |Server2| <- |Client|
>
> A client sends a request that starts a script on Server2.The script (
> running on server2)
> will download a webpage from Server1.
> Is it possible to record Client
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 20:12, Dan Poirier wrote:
> On 2010-05-11 at 12:55, HyperHacker wrote:
>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:47, Dan Poirier wrote:
>>> I just thought of a problem - right now, the funcname is optional
>>> (defaults to "handle"). I hate
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:47, Dan Poirier wrote:
> On 2010-05-11 at 08:52, Dan Poirier wrote:
>
>> On 2010-05-10 at 16:03, "William A. Rowe Jr." wrote:
>>> On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
> ...
>
> to
>
> LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
>>>
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 06:52, Dan Poirier wrote:
> On 2010-05-10 at 16:03, "William A. Rowe Jr." wrote:
>> On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
...
to
LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
LuaHook AuthChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
>
I haven't used it, but if mod_reqtimeout makes it entirely redundant,
my vote would be to keep it in trunk only. People interested in how
the attack/defence work can look at it, and there might be those who
for some reason don't want mod_reqtimeout.
--
Sent from my toaster.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 14:28, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 3/21/2010 3:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>
>> Include conf/empty/*
>>
>> Include conf/*/whoops.conf
>>
>> The last one (based on an existing conf/empty directive) fails, alerting the
>> admin
>> to the fact that they made a typo
A while back I had the idea that Lua would be a great scripting
language for web servers. I checked Google, and several pages
mentioned a recently developed Apache httpd module that does just
that. However, even months later, all a search finds is a couple blogs
and sites talking about "the next ve
18 matches
Mail list logo
