On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 06:52, Dan Poirier <poir...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On 2010-05-10 at 16:03, "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> to
>>>>
>>>> LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
>>>> LuaHook AuthChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
>>>> LuaHook CheckUserID /path/to/script.lua funcname
>>
>> Any reason not to name the func before the script, especially since path
>> names
>> can get long winded, and I'm thinking C like decl funcname(args) {script}
>
> So we'd have
>
> LuaHook AccessChecker funcname /path/to/script.lua
>
> and (unchanged)
>
> <LuaHook AccessChecker funcname>
>
> which makes the two forms more consistent too. Sounds fine to me.
>
> Dan
>
+1. Really looking forward to Lua as a web server language.
--
Sent from my toaster.
