On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 04:26:44PM -0400, Fenlason, Josh wrote:
Has anyone seen any problems in apr_rmm.c on systems with shared memory
and ldap enabled?
When I stop Apache via Crtl-C, I'm getting the Windows error saying that
something is a miss in Apache. Stepping into the debugger, reveals
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:24:49AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
This is why I would like to see the release of 2.2 as soon as
possible. My only explanation is that I missed changing the NULL
parameter to ldc-ldap when I did the backport of the conversion from
global to per-connection from
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 02:24:50PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 12:11:56PM -, Martin Kraemer wrote:
Author: martin
Date: Fri Jul 22 05:11:55 2005
New Revision: 220307
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=220307view=rev
Log:
Allow
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:04:42AM -0700, Girish Muraly wrote:
I ran the httpd-tests and I got 21 test failures in
the perl-framework due to t/modules/cgi.t and 1 error
due to t/modules/include.t. The errors are:
[just the snippet from running t/TEST]
t/modules/cgi...NOK 14#
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 02:11:04AM -0700, Girish Muraly wrote:
Hi Joe,
I am running the tests on Fedora Core 3. My Apache
(version 2.0.54) is configured as part of a LAMP stack
and I am running tests on each of the components
(Apache, Mysql and PHP,Perl,Python). I am quite new to
the
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:39:36PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
Any objections to this?
None at all - if the v2.0 code can be made more stable this is always a
good thing, but there are lots more problems in the v2.0 code that are
fixed in the v2.2 rewrite.
Ah, sorry
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:40:58PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
configure.in makes a big deal about determining AP_SIG_GRACEFUL, which
defaults to SIGUSR1, but uses SIGWINCH on Linux 2.0. But then
mpm_common.c goes ahead and ignores this for actually sending the
signal, SIGUSR1 is
Since 2.0.54, it seems mod_auth_ldap just segfaults on any request if
built against older versions of OpenLDAP, 2.2.20 and earlier (pre-2005).
It looks like this was another regression caused the addition of the
LDAPConnectionTimeout option. (New features, stable branch,
regressions? Hmmm,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 04:42:59PM -, Martin Kraemer wrote:
Author: martin
Date: Wed Jul 20 09:42:58 2005
New Revision: 219940
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=219940view=rev
Log:
Collaborative work: (Thanks, dreid!)
Implement OID checking for mod_ssl. This code allows for
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 11:12:07AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 04:42:59PM -, Martin Kraemer wrote:
Author: martin
Date: Wed Jul 20 09:42:58 2005
New Revision: 219940
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=219940view=rev
Log:
Collaborative work: (Thanks
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 12:11:56PM -, Martin Kraemer wrote:
Author: martin
Date: Fri Jul 22 05:11:55 2005
New Revision: 220307
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=220307view=rev
Log:
Allow extraction of the values of SSL certificate extensions into
environment variables, so that
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 11:58:21AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
Thanks Paul, you just collided with the refactoring of 2.1.x proxy.
Is this refactoring complete? Apart from the compiler warnings, a bunch
of the t/ssl/proxy.t tests have started failing with the trunk code.
With worker, the
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:02:56AM -0700, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
with config:
SSLSessionCache dbm:/var/run/ssl_scache
SSLSessionCacheTimeout 300
SSLMutexfile:/var/run/ssl_mutex
Using s/shmcb/dbm/ and SSLMutex default is IMO the best default
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 07:43:35AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I'm so confused while trying to draw the line between
alternate RFC-compliant philosophy
fixes for actual RFC violations
fixes for security issues
I think CHANGES should be crystal clear on what change has a security
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:51:04PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
Attached is a backport of rev 209530, which demanded a little
bit of rework to make it functional.
This resolves build issues which caused errors in 0.9.7f and
prior on Win32 and build failures on Netware. This patch
correctly
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 09:35:58AM -, Paul Querna wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Fri Jul 8 02:35:56 2005
New Revision: 209723
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=209723view=rev
Log:
The request smuggling issue did get assigned CAN-2005-2088.
Ah, I was just about to commit a
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 09:53:44AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
At 01:48 AM 7/8/2005, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:51:04PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
This resolves build issues which caused errors in 0.9.7f and
prior on Win32 and build failures on Netware. This patch
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 01:32:54PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I've run into this with some broken browsers. Basically, they
require a non-null SessionID in the SSL transaction. If, for whatever
reason, we disable the external SSL Session Cache, these
browsers reports errors when connecting to
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:53:52PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jul 6, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:45:21AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
...
+else {
+char *len_end;
+errno = 0;
+c-len
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:03:33AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
Cool. Thank you for the clarification. Final question, please
verify my guess that;
Content-Length:
is the same as
Content-Length: 0
Why would you assume that?
RFC2616, 14.13:
Content-Length= Content-Length :
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:46:03PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
I didn't assume; I guessed :)
Thank you for that observation Joe,
Content-Length:
is most definitely invalid according to the grammar. Although
the grammar doesn't account for
Content-Length: 0
0 does match 1*DIGIT -
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:10:33AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I think that there are a few more changes that need to be made. At
least on NetWare it won't compile without the following additional
patch.
This one needs a typedef which is defined correctly for the version of
OpenSSL in use,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:45:21AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
...
+else {
+char *len_end;
+errno = 0;
+c-len = ap_strtol(content_length, len_end, 10);
...
+if (errno || (c-len 0) || (len_end *len_end)) {
You should
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 06:40:59PM -, Paul Querna wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Mon Jun 27 11:40:56 2005
New Revision: 202027
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=202027view=rev Log: *)
server/mpm_common.c: Send a simple HTTP 1.0 request to every listener
socket, instead of just
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:46:23PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Gustavo A. Baratto wrote:
prefork.c:103: error: syntax error before '*' token
prefork.c:103: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
gmake[4]: *** [prefork.lo] Error 1
gmake[4]: Leaving
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:41:42PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
and then upload the preprocessed output prefork.o somewhere? Possibly
you're picking up an installed mpm.h which was generated for a different
MPM, or something like that.
Actually, I have been hitting
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 11:23:55AM +0200, David Welton wrote:
[ Ok, trying this again as a subscriber... I guess the list mods missed it:-/
]
Hi, I've managed to tickle an obscure bug in Tcl's environment
introspection by launching a 'starpack' (self contained Tcl
executable+script) as a
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 01:03:57AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Please vote on releasing 2.1.6 as -alpha.
+1 for alpha, manual test OK and httpd-test passes for this tarball on
all-the-linuxes here.
joe
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:40:50AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Please test and vote on releasing 2.1.5 as -alpha.
+1 for alpha, httpd-test'ed on a bunch of Linuxes here, looks good.
Thanks Paul! Also +1 on basing the 2.1.x/2.2.x stabilisation branch on
this per previous discussion.
The C-L vs
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 08:43:00AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I have run into this one also and I still don't understand why the
make is all of the sudden asking for yacc when this all worked
before. Since neither mod_ssl nor BSD sockets are part of the
standard NetWare
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:23:49AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
Patch below is an attempt to create a sanitized version of
config_vars.mk which is suitable for the installed tree.
The currently installed file has lots of references to the source and
build trees in e.g
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 04:10:54PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ben
Date: Thu Jun 9 09:10:53 2005
New Revision: 189771
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189771view=rev
Log:
Make path check more portable, make specifying a local OpenSSL build
actually work.
@@ -441,7
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 03:50:12PM -0700, Daniel Rall wrote:
When attempting to build Subversion trunk against the tip of httpd
trunk, instdso.sh was not set executable as assumed by Subversion's
build process. This is due to mishandling of the executable bit on
files copied into httpd's
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:37:50AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
I believe that we should be keeping items in the 2.1.x changelog at
this point, since we have done several releases
Ah, sorry, I remember the discussion about this previously but didn't
remember if there was consensus on what to
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 02:57:37PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ben
Date: Thu Jun 9 07:57:36 2005
New Revision: 189761
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=189761view=rev
Log:
Die properly when path is bollocks.
Did you mean to commit this to the branch? (given that it's not
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 09:39:40PM -, Paul Querna wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Sun May 29 14:39:39 2005
New Revision: 178990
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178990view=rev
Log:
- Use a hash for the configuration command lookup implementation. Now
modules can properly
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 02:05:05PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 09:39:40PM -, Paul Querna wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Sun May 29 14:39:39 2005
New Revision: 178990
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178990view=rev
Log:
- Use a hash for the configuration
PR 12655 is a rather natty pool lifetime issue...
mod_include sets r-subprocess_env = r-main-subprocess_env in the
subrequest, and may set variables in that table from the subrequest's
r-pool. But it then goes and destroys the subrequest r-pool too early
(despite the fact that it guarantees it
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:30:23PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Fri Feb 11 06:08:24 2005
New Revision: 153400
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153400
Log:
Support use of an external copy of the PCRE library:
*
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:56:46PM -0700, Bill Barker wrote:
Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:38:58PM -, Jean-Frederic Clere wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu May 19 05:38:57 2005
New Revision: 170920
URL: http
As discussed previously; this patch stops killing piped loggers; except
that prefork still kills them at shutdown and ungraceful restart since
it signals the entire process group, so it's not entirely consistent.
In all other cases (graceful restart with prefork; shutdown and both
types of
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 07:50:04AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 5/20/05, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As discussed previously; this patch stops killing piped loggers; except
that prefork still kills them at shutdown and ungraceful restart since
it signals the entire process group, so
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:23:21AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/experimental/mod_dbd.h (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/experimental/mod_dbd.h Wed May 18 02:23:20 2005
@@ -1,11 +1,25 @@
-/*Copyright (c) 2004, Nick Kew. All rights reserved.
-
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 04:49:10PM -0400, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 5/12/05, Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Without this patch, the new apr_pool_join stuff in apr's trunk
segfaults all over the place.
Why? Is worker MPM doing something wrong
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:38:58PM -, Jean-Frederic Clere wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu May 19 05:38:57 2005
New Revision: 170920
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=170920view=rev
Log:
Fix 32787 and the problems I have when using
--enable-experimental-libtool. (libtool is
an
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:40:29AM +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
(2) mod_dbd is a utility for other modules, which it serves by
exporting three functions, best explained by a brief extract
from mod_dbd.h:
...
In terms of API, I'd much rather see *just* the optional function
exports to avoid
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:55:24AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 5/16/05, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the month of the piped loggers... there's another issue in this
code (just had the report this morning, by coincidence), that each time
a piped logger is spawned (or respawned
It's the month of the piped loggers... there's another issue in this
code (just had the report this morning, by coincidence), that each time
a piped logger is spawned (or respawned), an fd is leaked.
Without the fix to APR I committed earlier, this can cause the parent to
segfault if enough piped
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:37:17PM +0900, Masaoki Kobayashi wrote:
This is a patch for the version of ab on the trunk.
In this version of ab, HAVE_OPENSSL controls if I
have OpenSSL. I conformed to the way although I
did not checked the case of HAVE_SSLC.
Thanks a lot, and sorry for the slow
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 08:22:32PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 5/15/05, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would be OK to make the behaviour change for 2.2 at least,
since the current behaviour of losing log entries during graceful
restart if using piped loggers is definitely
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:22:57AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
...
Joe Orton says, To fix this properly, I suppose piped loggers should not get
SIGTERMedduring a graceful restart, they should read till EOF then
exit(0): then
when the last child attached to the piped logger for a particular
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:13:47PM +0900, Masaoki Kobayashi wrote:
This patch modifies the support/ab.c to handle SSL/TLS
properly.
This looks really wonderful, thanks a lot for submitting this. Is there
any chance that you can rediff this against the version of ab on the
trunk?
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:26:41PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Branch URL:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/listen-protocol/
I have created a branch to:
1. Add a 'protocol' to the Listen Command. (done)
2. Add a Protocol command to force the protocol inside a vhost.
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:55:16AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
server/util_pcre.c was copied here from srclib/pcre/pcreposix.c, and has
since been de-libpcre'ized.
It currently doesn't look anything like the standard httpd style, and it
does not contain an ASL 2.0 License Header.
Attached
2.1 is logging a message for every connection which is closed with no
request sent: since that's exactly what the dummy_connection() does this
leaves a lot of weird-looking spam in the error_log when a server load
spike passes with prefork.
I think this should at least be downgraded to
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 03:58:46PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
Look at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_expr.c
It has two globals:
ssl_expr_info_type ssl_expr_info;
char *ssl_expr_error;
Which are used inside the ssl_expr_comp(), which is
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 06:12:04PM -0500, Rici Lake wrote:
I guess that depends on whether most filters use and recycle pass
brigades. I suspect that most internal filters don't (and possibly have
the model which Joe Schaefer describes, where the brigade is simply
passed through), whereas
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 06:27:15PM -, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Mon Apr 25 11:27:15 2005
New Revision: 164618
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=164618view=rev
Log:
Note quick hack, but it means we use some hidden knowledge.
Modified:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 04:42:04PM -0500, Rici Lake wrote:
On 22-Apr-05, at 9:32 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
The issue here is really which party can *destroy* a brigade, right?
Or perhaps which party *must* destroy a brigade. This is much less of
an issue if neither party creates a new
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:15:02AM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Joe Orton wrote:
1. update the util_filter.h documentation
2. add some APR_BUCKET_DEBUG code to abort() when brigades are used
after being destroyed
3. adjust all filters to work with this model
4
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:44:39AM -0500, Rici Lake wrote:
Allocating the brigade out of the bucket allocator but continuing to
register the cleanup with a pool (say, the request pool if that were
appropriate) might work but it would be fragile.
Fragile, why? That's exactly the right
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 05:21:42PM -, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Mon Apr 25 10:21:40 2005
@@ -95,6 +95,11 @@
identify exactly what the proposed changes are! ]
[ please append new backports at the
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 03:58:59PM -0500, Rici Lake wrote:
If we accept that the contents of a brigade are undefined when
ap_pass_brigade returns, the caller has three options:
-- call cleanup and reuse the brigade
-- call destroy (which will first call cleanup)
-- drop it on the floor and
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 07:05:34PM -0500, Rici Lake wrote:
On 21-Apr-05, at 5:51 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
Rici Lake wrote:
FWIW, I think the (apparent) practice, where the caller relinquishes
ownership of the buckets but not the brigade itself, is more efficient
since it avoids a lot of
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:27:12PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
Looking in srclib/pcre/configure.in I see that there is
dnl Handle --enable-shared-libraries
LIBTOOL=./libtool
LIBSUFFIX=la
AC_ARG_ENABLE(shared,
[ --disable-sharedbuild PCRE as a static
Is there any good reason why the ssl_hook_Translate functionality really
has to be in a translate_name hook? PR 34452 is a nice snafu where the
ssl-unclean-shutdown setting is not taking effect if using a reverse
proxy, because the mod_ssl translate_hook never gets run. mod_proxy is
only one
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Alexander Lazic wrote:
Hi,
i use the 2.1 tunk ab and have found 2 segfaults, it think.
the first one was easy to find:
in ssl_print_cert_info() the buf is 64 not BUFSIZ
for eg. =X509_NAME_oneline(dn, buf, BUFSIZ);
The second one was not so
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 12:02:35PM -0700, Wilfredo Snchez Vega wrote:
We're investigating possible issues in the system. One comment
from a kernel developer:
We are returning EWOULDBLOCK because the socket is in non-blocking.
Inspecting the socket, so_state is 0x182 (0x100 is
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 04:12:25PM -0400, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
On April 13, 2005 11:46 pm, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
TODO ISSUES REMAINING IN MOD_SSL:
[snip]
* the shmcb code should just align its memory segment rather than
jumping through all the safe memcpy and memset hoops
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:25:22AM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
As usual the tarballs are at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
+1 for release, looks good in httpd-test'ing here. Thanks for RMing.
joe
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:47:03PM -, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Author: bnicholes
Date: Mon Apr 11 08:47:03 2005
New Revision: 160909
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160909
Log:
Fix a const/non-const conversion error when building with the strict
Metrowerks compiler
What
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 07:40:13PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
It seems like mod_proxy_http is being cute and not sending an EOS
bucket down the rest of the filter stack when it only receives
headers. This (most likely) causes mod_cache's cache_save_filter
to not be run when it receives a
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:02:05PM +0100, Nick wrote:
I understand that if a CGI process is launched then gets stuck, if the
CGI process keeps quiet, the apache server will not 'know' the http
connection has broken so will not 'know' to kill the CGI process. The
stuck CGI process and the
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:58:40AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
dbmmanage can be out of sync with Apache w.r.t. database formats used.
htdbm uses exactly the same code as Apache so the set of database
formats is the same and the default preference is the same. The
dbmmanage script has to be
Enabling UserDir by default can allow remote users to determine whether
a given username is valid on the system or not, even if no users have a
public_html directory, from the difference between a 403 from a chmod
700 /home/realuser and a 404 from not finding /home/nosuchuser.
After a few
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 12:16:03PM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
At 03:42 AM 3/30/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New Revision: 159470
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=159470
*) Unix MPMs: Shut down the server more quickly when child processes are
slow to exit. [Joe Orton
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 05:50:31PM -, William Rowe wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Thu Mar 17 09:50:29 2005
New Revision: 157948
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157948
Log:
Fix three problems with pcre for portability;
1. study.c's pointer arg didn't jive with
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:12:15PM -0500, Daniel Freedman wrote:
Anyway, I'm using apache 2.0.53 (mpm-prefork) on Debian testing on two
different ia32 machines, with generally similar installs, and
exhibiting the following problem only on one of them (which
complicates the problem, in my
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 08:54:52PM -0700, Joel J Smith wrote:
Hi httpd folks,
It seems that Joe Orton introduced a bug while updating ssl_engine_io.c
between version 109499 and version 59. The same bug was introduced
into NetWare's mod_nw_ssl.c version 111327. (Please forgive me if that's
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:40:35PM -, Paul Querna wrote:
...
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/config.m4 (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/config.m4 Tue Mar 8 14:40:33 2005
@@ -12,7 +12,25 @@
apache_cv_mpm=$APACHE_MPM
-if test $apache_cv_mpm = worker -o
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:01:20PM +0200, Arkadi Shishlov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:22:46PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 19:00:05 +0200, Arkadi Shishlov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So is there any progress with the issue or just nobody is interested?
me
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 06:56:47AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:20:29 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Thu Mar 3 03:20:27 2005
New Revision: 156032
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=156032
Log:
Third time
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 10:22:12PM +, Nick Kew wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
As to Nick's comment, I certainly agree with your position, there
is not enough adoption of APR to -not- roll in the apr/apr-util
Isn't that chicken-and-egg? APR is seen as part of Apache(httpd)
by
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:52:57PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
No idea why I'm suddenly hitting this, but in preparation for 2.1.3, I
spent another one of my patented hours searching for bugs in httpd that end
up being bugs in the perl-framework tests. =(
perl-framework generates
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:42:12AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:52:57PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
The issue with this is that wildcard IP addresses aren't really supposed to
be explicit in Listen statements. httpd has a bunch of logic for inferring
the right
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 11:04:54PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
2.1.3 tarballs at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Thanks, as ever!
I'd like to get enough votes for 2.1.3 to be a beta and commence the
feature freeze towards a 2.2.0 GA.
Tested across a variety of Linuxes here, +1 for
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 01:12:52AM -0800, Paul Querna wrote:
First, let me say that apr_brigade_split is evil.
Specifically the combination of apr_brigade_split() and an
apr_brigade_destroy() which is a noop, yes; #23567 is another example of
a leak caused by this.
I'd also concluded that
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:51:50PM +, David Reid wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
Here's an alternative implementation: does it work for you?
This looks good to me and seems to work as required.
Great!
Care to commit it?
Now done.
joe
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 08:37:08AM +1100, NormW wrote:
The following simple 'update' to the NWGNUmakefile in the 2.1 root gets
the build process back on track and to completion for NetWare. Not
tested the resulting build as yet, tho. :-)
I applied that, thanks Norm.
joe
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:46:11AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Thursday, February 10, 2005 3:45 PM + Joe Orton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No objections to going ahead with this?
Not from here.
Let's shoot to get the PCRE situation finally resolved for 2.2. -- justin
OK
Here's an alternative implementation: does it work for you?
Index: ssl_private.h
===
--- ssl_private.h (revision 153210)
+++ ssl_private.h (working copy)
@@ -641,6 +641,9 @@
/* Variables */
void
No objections to going ahead with this?
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 03:01:56PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
There are two problems with the use of PCRE in httpd: firstly that there
is no support for use of an external pcre library (PR27750), and
secondly that use of the pcreposix.h interface can cause
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:17:20AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Thursday, February 10, 2005 4:38 PM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Thu Feb 10 08:38:47 2005
New Revision: 153273
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153273
Log:
* Makefile.in: Use
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 09:08:02PM +, David Reid wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 04:17 AM 2/2/2005, David Reid wrote:
Basically this allows us to gain access to the actual cert structure.
Agreed that raw cert isn't that useful, and somewhat frightens
me in the environment
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 07:32:32AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 07:43:48AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
which is not portable... z/OS doesn't have it, and I would assume
that z/OS isn't the only reason we've been dragging around PrintPath
all this time...
Yikes.
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:44:47AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I didn't mean that, but that looks better ;)
(what I meant was to use which cut to see if which works; the rest
of the script already assumes that cut exists)
I'm not sure if throwing away all the output satisfies Joe's concern;
I presume this fixes #31418? Your patch makes sense to me. I could
argue that it could even be done *before* the SSLRequire checking, such
that the username is logged appropriately even if an SSLRequire
triggers a 403, but I doubt that matters much.
Thanks for looking at this!
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:07:56AM +, David Reid wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
My only concern ... does this new scope pair up properly if the
user cert has been renegotiated? If so +1
I'm unable to test that here, but maybe if someone has a system where
renegotiation is
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:17:04AM +, David Reid wrote:
Basically this allows us to gain access to the actual cert structure.
I don't like the idea of exposing the X509 * directly especially not
through a char * interface. Exposing the DER representation (e.g.
base64-encoded) through
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 11:09:47AM +, David Reid wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:17:04AM +, David Reid wrote:
Basically this allows us to gain access to the actual cert structure.
I don't like the idea of exposing the X509 * directly especially not
through
1101 - 1200 of 1530 matches
Mail list logo
