Great!! Thank you very much for sharing this with us!
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 10:46 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Lu, Yingqi
Subject: Better SO_REUSEPORT
Looks like we can do even better/faster
Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Can you please look and incorporate the SO_REUSEPORT patch for this release
> as well?
>
> Thanks,
> Yingqi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: olli hauer [mailto:oha...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Monday
Hi Jim,
Can you please look and incorporate the SO_REUSEPORT patch for this release as
well?
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: olli hauer [mailto:oha...@gmx.de]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 11:30 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: T&R of 2.4.17 this week
On 2015-10-05 17
Yann,
Thanks very much for bringing it up. We would love to see that SO_REUSEPORT
patch being merged into the release version of the httpd. It has been a long
time :)
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 1:
Hi All,
The SO_REUSEPORT patch is only lack one vote now. It would be really great if
we can make it this time.
Guys, please test it out and vote for us if you like it. It boosts your
performance on bigger Xeon systems.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw
Hi All,
Please test and vote the SO_REUSEPORT patch available at
http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/httpd-2.4.x-ap_listeners_buckets-v3.patch.
We are only lacking 1 vote now.
Thank you very much!
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: Friday, May
Hi Yann,
Thank you very much for your help!
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2015 3:37 AM
To: httpd
Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Willi
(on 3), it makes its way ;)
Regards,
Yann.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just want to check if anyone gets chances to check the SO_REUSEPORT patch?
> Any feedback?
>
> Thanks,
> Yingqi
>
> -Original Message-
> F
Hi All,
I just want to check if anyone gets chances to check the SO_REUSEPORT patch?
Any feedback?
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 8:58 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: SO_REUSEPORT
Hi Christophe, Jim
Hi Christophe, Jim and Yann,
Thank you very much for your consideration of putting SO_REUSEPORT patch in the
2.4 stable release.
I am also very happy that you find the white paper :-) All the most recent
testing results are included in the white paper. Also, we have tested the
(graceful) rest
, 2015 10:56 AM
To: Lu, Yingqi
Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [NOTICE] Intend to T&R 2.4.12 tomorrow (Thurs, Jan 22)
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:08:20 +0000
"Lu, Yingqi" wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Thanks for the update!
>
> A quick question on the review and testi
4:04 AM
To: httpd
Subject: Re: [NOTICE] Intend to T&R 2.4.12 tomorrow (Thurs, Jan 22)
Hi Yingqi,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
>
> A quick question on the review and testing procedure. Right now, Yann Ylavic
> already made available a 2.4 version of the patch
@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [NOTICE] Intend to T&R 2.4.12 tomorrow (Thurs, Jan 22)
Since that was a very new patch, there was a risk in adding it to 2.4.11/12
since it would not have had enough time for adequate testing. It will be
proposed for 2.4.13.
> On Jan 22, 2015, at 12:14
Hi Jim,
Is the SO_REUSPORT patch committed in this build?
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 3:43 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [NOTICE] Intend to T&R 2.4.12 tomorrow (Thurs, Jan 22)
I expect to T&R
Hi All,
I just want to check if there is any feedback on this? 2.4.12 T&R will be
opened tomorrow, it would be great to get your feedback soon.
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 4:32 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache
et), keep at least 1 of them idle. You can increase the values
later if needed.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-----
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:39 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: AW: Time for 2.4.11
Hi Yann,
Thanks very much
release every 3-4 months, but this one lagged behind.
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 12:41 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
>
> By the way, do you have an estimate on when is the 2.4.12?
>
> I guess I will ping you back when the window opens for 2.4.12!
>
> Thanks,
> Yingqi
>
> ---
By the way, do you have an estimate on when is the 2.4.12?
I guess I will ping you back when the window opens for 2.4.12!
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:39 AM
To: httpd
Subject: RE: AW: Time for 2.4.11
Hi Yann,
Thanks very much
Hi Yann,
Thanks very much for your help!
Yes, I think I can help to document the "ListenCoresBucketsRatio", at least to
draft it. Also, I think I can share the settings from our testing regarding to
this work.
I will send them later this week.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From:
Ok, I will send them in the morning.
Thanks,
Yingqi
> On Jan 14, 2015, at 11:53 PM, "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group"
> wrote:
>
> All of them are needed.
>
> Regards
>
> Rüdiger
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Lu, Yingqi [ma
ent one is good enough. I can help
you find if you want.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-----
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:35 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: Time for 2.4.11
Hi Jim,
Thanks very much for your replies. I do not t
need to craft one (or do the svn commits apply cleanly)??
> On Jan 14, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
>
> I just want to check what the status on the "SO_REUSEPORT" patch is. Do you
> see any issues backport it? Please let me know.
>
> Attached is the email I se
x27;s shoot for a T&R next week. The work will keep me warm :)
>
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 9:57 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject:RE: Time for 2.4.11
Hi Jim,
Thanks for your email. I think it should not be very hard to back port. After
you trunked the origi
I just want to check what the status on the "SO_REUSEPORT" patch is. Do you see
any issues backport it? Please let me know.
Attached is the email I sent last week on the same topic in case you missed
that.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Hi All,
I just want to ping again to see if there is any updates on this?
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 9:57 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: Time for 2.4.11
Hi Jim,
Thanks for your email. I
.@jagunet.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 5:47 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Time for 2.4.11
Let me look... how easy is the backport?
> On Jan 8, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Can we make the "SO_REUSEPORT" support into this new stable
Hi All,
Can we make the "SO_REUSEPORT" support into this new stable version? The first
version of the patch was trunked last June. After tests and modifications, I
think it is ready to go.
Please let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto
r your help!
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 7:49 AM
To: httpd
Subject: Re: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk
Hi Yingqi,
thanks for sharing your results.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Lu, Y
ontinued in [1].
[1].
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201410.mbox/%3c9acd5b67aac5594cb6268234cf29cf9aa37e9...@orsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com%3E
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Attached patch is generated based on current trunk. It covers for
> prefork/worke
EPORT on trunk
Hi Yingqi,
let's continue discussing this on the original thread if you don't mind, I made
an update there.
Thanks,
Yann.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Hi Yann,
>
> I just took some testing on the most recent trunk version. I found ou
: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 9:10 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk
Hi Yann,
Thank you very much for your help!
As this is getting better, I am wondering if you guys have plan
(please see commit log).
These are not big changes, and your work on removing the global variables and
restoring some previous behaviour is great, thanks for the good work.
Regards,
Yann.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Thank you very much for your help!
>
> Thanks,
on it currently, will commit soon.
Regards,
Yann.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just want to check if there is any feedback/comments on this?
>
> For details, please refer to Yann Ylavic's notes and my responses below.
>
> Thanks,
>
Hi All,
I just want to check if there is any feedback/comments on this?
For details, please refer to Yann Ylavic's notes and my responses below.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 4:56 PM
To
nd my responses below.
I also attached the code changes here again in case you missed it in the
original email I sent last Friday.
Thanks very much,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 4:56 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subjec
s buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
>> 3. Yes, I did use some extern variables. I can change the name of them to
>> better coordinate with the variable nam
@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 5:04 PM
To: httpd
Subject: Re: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Here is what I think. Currently (trunk version as well as my original
> patch),
>
>
I tested it and it works.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 3:13 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: svn commit: r1629909 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: include/ap_mmn.h
include/scoreboard.h server/mpm/event
Here is what I think. Currently (trunk version as well as my original patch),
1. Without SO_REUSEPORT or when available CPU number < 8, num_bucket = 1
anyway. It duplicates 1 listener and use that for this single bucket. If folks
think we should not duplicate in this case, I can modify the code
Hi Yann,
I am still testing the fix. It is half way through. I already modified
min_spare_threads to min_spare_threads/num_buckets for both worker and event
MPM in my test bed, so I am testing the most recent version anyway (thought I
would mention this together with the testing results).
Rega
d, so there is no need
for each mpm to handle its own array.
Can you please check that it works for you?
Regards,
Yann.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> In the last version, I forgot to change _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN to
> _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF for worker mpm.
>
>
In the last version, I forgot to change _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN to
_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF for worker mpm.
Please use this version to review. Sorry for the duplication.
Thanks very much for your help!
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday
let me know if this version works.
Thanks very much,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 7:46 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: svn commit: r1599531 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES
include/ap_listen.h server/liste
Hi Yann,
Sorry that I just saw your messages, I was too focus on coding the fix :-)
Almost done.
I will take a look at your suggested code and try to incorporate it into the
fix.
Hopefully, I can send something out tonight.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Yann Ylavic [mailt
malloc and realloc(), I think it would be just in
memory. I can free() the whole thing on httpd stop. Do you mean that or you
actually mean we need create a new memory pool, allocate/realloc the memory
there and register the cleanup on stop?
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-----
From:
5, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> To address your first comment, the issue with pconf pool is that bucket array
> value needs to be retained via restart and graceful restart. Based on your
> comments, I now put bucket array into the retained_data struct for all the
> mpm
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2014 2:37 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: svn commit: r1599531 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES
include/ap_listen.h server/listen.c server/mpm/event/event.c
server/mpm/prefork/prefork.c
8:38 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Here (attachment) is the most recent version of the fix. It fixes a
> small issue for event mpm in the version I sent out yesterday. Please
> use this one as the final fix. I have already updated the Bugzilla
> database for "Bug 55897 -
f, can you please help review it and add it into the trunk?
Thanks very much for your help,
Yingqi
-Original Message-----
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2014 10:54 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: svn commit: r1599531 - in /httpd/httpd/trun
server/mpm/event/event.c
server/mpm/prefork/prefork.c server/mpm/worker/worker.c server/mpm_unix.c
On 05.10.2014 02:27, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Kaspar, can you please test the patch and let us know if that resolves
> your issue?
Yes, makes the restart issues disappear for me (only tested with
o make sure num_buckets does not change during the restart.
Kaspar, can you please test the patch and let us know if that resolves your
issue?
At the meantime, can some please review the patch and help add it into trunk?
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yin
Hi Kaspar,
Thanks for the email. I will try to duplicate your case and find a solution for
it.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Kaspar Brand [mailto:httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch]
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2014 4:08 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1599531 - in
mall patch to fix the issue. Can you please help to add the
changes into the trunk?
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-----
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 9:12 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm
3:39 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I just found that prefork and worker has issue with restart. Event mpm code
> is good.
>
> I created this small patch to fix the issue for both prefork and worker. The
> patch is based on rev #1600451.
>
> Can you please
-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 8:50 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
Thank you very much for your help!
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski
t; On Jun 3, 2014, at 8:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> I have folded this into trunk and am currently fixing some compile
>> warnings and errors...
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2014, at 4:22 AM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> Personal
too.
I already tested the code for the above approaches and they both work.
Please let me know which way you think is better. I can quickly send you an
update for review.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 3:28 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [PATCH
bucket);
>>
>> We can change the API at this point. We could
>> add another function, eg ap_mpm_pod_signal_ex() which
>> takes the int param, but we can't modify ap_mpm_pod_signal()
>> itself.
>>
>>> On May 30, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Lu, Yingqi wrot
into trunk this weekend.
On May 16, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Thanks very much for clarifying this with me. I added #ifdef in the code to
> check _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN in the so_reuseport patch. Bucket patch does not
> use this parameter so that it r
Hi All,
I just want to ping again on these two patches.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 9:03 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
trunk?
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 11:53 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
Hi Jim,
Thanks very much for clarifying this with me. I
Dear All,
I am checking if there are any questions/comments on both of the patches? Also,
I am wondering what the process of patch acceptance is.
Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com
Dear all,
Any other feedback/comments/questions?
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 9:00 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
Hi Jim,
Thanks very much for your
Dear all,
Any other feedback/comments/questions?
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 9:00 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
Hi Jim,
Thanks very much for your
Dear all,
I sent this message twice in the morning, but I did not receive anything back.
I am resending this one more time, just trying to gather your
feedback/comments/questions on both of the patches.
Sorry for the duplications.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi
feedback/comments/questions. Thanks very much for
your time reviewing the patches.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 9:00 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with
at 7:55 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> During the last couple weeks, I spent some time extending the original two
> patches from prefork MPM only to all three Linux MPMs (prefork, worker and
> event). Attached is the latest version of the two patches. Bugzilla database
:21 PM, "Lu, Yingqi"
mailto:yingqi...@intel.com>> wrote:
I just want to ping again on the modifications we made on both of the patches
[bugzilla #55897 and bugzilla #56279]. Please let us know your comments and
feedback.
I am reattaching the patch files here in case you missed or
Dear all,
I just want to ping again on the modifications we made on both of the patches
[bugzilla #55897 and bugzilla #56279]. Please let us know your comments and
feedback.
Thanks,
Yingqi
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 1:56 PM
To: dev
Dear all,
I just want to ping on both of these two patches to see if there is anything we
can do to help them get accepted.
Your feedbacks and comments are very much appreciated.
Thanks,
Yingqi Lu
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 1:41 PM
To: dev
Hi Tim,
Thanks for your email.
SO_REUSEPORT feature is enabled on Linux kernel 3.9 and newer. The feature is
defined at /usr/include/asm-generic/socket.h.
With the old kernel, the definition is there, but is commented out.
/*#define SO_REUSEPORT 15*/
The section of code below is just to de
Hi Yann,
As we pointed out in our original discussion thread, we dropped the child
process implementation due to the kernel defect with changing the number of
open sockets. Now, we quickly tested this child process implementation
(prefork) with our workload on a modern Xeon dual sockets server
defined in the httpd.conf file.
Thanks,
Yingqi
From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 5:49 AM
To: httpd
Subject: Re: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Lu, Yingqi
mailto:yingqi
for your posts, and please do not feel ignored. There are a handful
of people active and we all have many details to attend to.
Yours,
Bill
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Our analysis of Apache httpd 2.4.7 prefork mpm, on 32 and 64 thre
unclear to me why an accept mutex is needed at all.
Multiple processes poll()ing the same inherited socket is safe but not multiple
ones? Is that an OS issue? Process wide only? Still (in)valid in latest OSes?
Thanks for the patch anyway, it looks promising.
Regards,
Yann.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014
This is actually a very good point. We should make the SO_REUSEPORT detection
over the runtime.
I will put this comment into the change list.
Thanks very much, Arkadiusz!
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz [mailto:ar...@maven.pl]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 10:51 A
: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Lu, Yingqi
mailto:yingqi...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
I just want to ping again on this patch to gather your feedback and comments.
Please refer to the messages below for patch details.
Hi All,
I just want to ping again on this patch to gather your feedback and comments.
Please refer to the messages below for patch details.
If you need any additional information/supporting data, please let us know as
well.
Thanks,
Yingqi
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10
Hi Jeff,
I am just checking if you got chance to check this?
Thanks,
Lucy
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:37 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: FW: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
Thanks very much, Jeff!
Thanks,
Lucy
From
, Yingqi
mailto:yingqi...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
I just want to ping again on this patch to gather your feedback and comments.
Please refer to the messages below for patch details.
Thanks,
Yingqi
Hi Yinqqi,
I'm sorry that nobody has responded yet. I'll try to do so very soon.
Hi All,
I just want to ping again on this patch to gather your feedback and comments.
Please refer to the messages below for patch details.
Thanks,
Yingqi
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:13 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm
I am reattaching the patch in case you missed the original email.
Thanks,
Yingqi
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:09 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
Hi All,
I just want to ping again on this
Hi All,
I just want to ping again on this patch to see if there are any feedback and
comments. This is our first patch to the Apache community. Please let us know
if there is anything we can do to help you test and comment the patch.
Thanks,
Yingqi
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Friday, January 24
Hi All,
I just want to check if there are feedback/comments to this patch?
Thanks,
Yingqi
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 3:26 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT support
Dear All,
Our analysis of Apache httpd
Dear All,
Our analysis of Apache httpd 2.4.7 prefork mpm, on 32 and 64 thread Intel Xeon
2600 series systems, using an open source three tier social networking web
server workload, revealed performance scaling issues. In current software
single listen statement (listen 80) provides better scal
85 matches
Mail list logo
