-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 2. März 2007 02:15
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PATCH 39299] - Patch review request
Thanks Nick for responding to my request.
My comments are in between.
On Wed, Feb
Maybe modsecurity (http://www.modsecurity.org/) already does what you need.
Otherwise it gives you an impression how to write an appropriate module to do
so.
Looking at http://apache.webthing.com/ for mod_accessibility and for
mod_proxy_html
also seems to be good idea to either find out that
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stuart Children
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Februar 2007 12:40
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r507955 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
-1 as is, Jim would you -please- post the actual patch you
are
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Henrik Nordstrom
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Februar 2007 16:33
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Regarding graceful restart
tor 2007-02-08 klockan 17:15 -0800 skrev Devi Krishna:
Hi,
Resending this mail, just in case anyone would have
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tigges
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2007 12:36
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: mod_cache mod_disk_cache
Hi,
I use an Apache 2.2 with mod_perl, mod_cache mod_disk_cache.
I add an unique string to $r-uri with an perl script, but have to
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Graham Leggett
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2007 16:15
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_cache: save filter recalls body to non-empty brigade?
On Wed, January 24, 2007 2:15 pm, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
In
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Lucas Brasilino
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Januar 2007 14:43
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: setting request timeout in mod_proxy/mod_proxy_balancer
Based on your configuration from above, the following should work:
No, it doesn't. I've
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Fredrik Widlund
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Januar 2007 10:23
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: mod_cache+mod_rewrite behaviour
I'm trying to get mod_cache to ignore the query_string part of the
request, since our customers use clicktags in
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Fredrik Widlund
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Januar 2007 12:30
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_cache+mod_rewrite behaviour
Hi,
Thanks for the information. Tried the patch and it mends it the
behaviour, however it doesn't really help me of
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Roy T. Fielding
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2007 23:23
An: Ruediger Pluem
Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org; dev@apr.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Mod_cache expires check
On Jan 17, 2007, at 12:23 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I would say 0 is not a bad
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 04:17
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: vote on concept of ServerTokens Off
On 12/5/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the latest patch that should be applied?
I'm
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 14:34
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
In this instance, we need to work through how this relates to
relevant updates leading to the CHANGES file entry:
core: Do not allow internal redirects like the
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 15:06
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Creating a thread safe module and the problem of
calling of 'CRYPTO_set_locking_callback' twice!
OpenSSL is just one of thousands of libraries a module
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mads Toftum
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 15:50
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: vote on concept of ServerTokens Off
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 03:45:54PM +0100, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
So, is that a -1 or -0?
A peanut gallery -1. I
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Graham Leggett
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. November 2006 12:31
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Auth in Location: can one basic auth config override another?
Hi all,
After much experimentation with httpd v2.0, where an attempt
is made to
set
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Graham Leggett
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. November 2006 13:31
Which version of httpd are you using?
2.0.55
In my case, I am trying to define one basic auth config under / using
mod_authz_ldap, and a second completely separate and independent
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. November 2006 02:36
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:33:07 +0100
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because of your question I had to rewalk the code path and I think
I found two other bugs with my code. I
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martin Kraemer
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. November 2006 13:22
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PATCH] mod_disk_cache fails to compile [Was:
svn commit: r468373 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES
modules/cache/mod_cache.c
modules/cache/mod_cache.c modules/cache/mod_cache.h
modules/cache/mod_disk_cache.c modules/cache/mod_disk_cache.h
modules/cache/mod_mem_c
On Thu, November 2, 2006 2:40 pm, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO wrote:
So Martin you are failing exactly at the same point as I do
(http://mail
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 11:27
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: cache: the store_body interface
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:13:09PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2) keep the interface as-is, but read buckets in
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 13:52
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: cache: the store_body interface
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:59:49AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 02:56:24PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz
Von:
Justin Erenkrantz
Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 16:15
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: cache: the store_body interface
On 10/31/06, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That seems to be an important point to me. Although I never used
the fd caching
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 15:18
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.2.3 mod_proxy issue]
How about
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^(.*\.jsp|/servlet/.*)$ balancer://mycluster$1 [P]
Proxy
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 17:05
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.2.3 mod_proxy issue]
I am a regexp fan and have mod_rewrite loaded in any of our
servers =
anyway
for some standard
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Graham Leggett
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2006 22:21
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r467655 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk:
CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_cache.xml
modules/cache/mod_cache.c modules/cache/mod_cache.h
I managed
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Davi Arnaut
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Oktober 2006 13:47
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r467655 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk:
CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_cache.xml
modules/cache/mod_cache.c modules/cache/mod_cache.h
Graham
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2006 17:59
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r467655 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk:
CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_cache.xml
modules/cache/mod_cache.c modules/cache/mod_cache.h
Index:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: news
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Oktober 2006 00:36
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: mod_deflate and flush?
Hi,
JSP (via mod_jk) and maybe other plugins sometimes flush the
connection,
so that the browsers receive everything that's stuck in
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Niklas Edmundsson
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. September 2006 11:38
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_cache responsibilities vs mod_xxx_cache
provider responsibilities
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Graham Leggett wrote:
This means the backend
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Sander Temme
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. September 2006 01:02
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: load balancer and http(s) sticky sessions
On Sep 14, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/14/2006 06:14 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Sander Temme
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. September 2006 17:41
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: load balancer and http(s) sticky sessions
On Sep 15, 2006, at 12:29 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF wrote:
But what if you need to switch the backend
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Yes, I am supporting Rüdiger's proposition. Don't make up some HTTP
status code for the aborted-connection condition. We already have a
way to record this issue (%c).
I guess by %c you mean what is now %X in, mod_log_config, right?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Issac Goldstand
Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. September 2006 12:04
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: why does ap_invoke_handler init input filters?
Hi all,
I've been trying to solve my confusion on the exact order
of hooks and
filters being
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Philip M. Gollucci
Is a release in the 2.0.x (2.0.59) soon to follow ?
It is already there.
Regards
Rüdiger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ruediger Pluem
BTW: Don't we need to reset checked_standby and
checking_standby to zero in
the outer while loop?
What about this? I guess we don't enter the inner while loop a second time
because checked_standby 0 once we have checked for
Please add it to the STATUS file of 2.2.x for voting.
Regards
Rüdiger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ben Laurie
Gesendet: Montag, 31. Juli 2006 16:13
An: Apache List
Betreff: Backport PCKS#7 patch to 2.2?
Will it be OK to do this?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
In other words, lets assume members a, b and c are in
set 0 and d, e and f are in set 1 and g, h and i are in
set 2. We check a, b and c and they are not usable, so
we now start checking set 1. Should we re-check the
members in set 0
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 00:55
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: hot standby in proxy added
My thoughts are how to make this better; overloading the concept
of disabled workers to mean multiple things depending on
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jean-frederic Clere
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 14:21
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: ap_proxy_get_worker
Hi,
Why does ap_proxy_get_worker() gives the best matched worker? -
Shouldn't it give the exact match -
Normally you do not
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jean-frederic Clere
Ok.
What happends in a configuration like:
+++
ProxyPass /foo http://foo.example.com/bar
ProxyPass /bar http://foo.example.com/bar/foo
+++
Only one worker will be created.
Yes this is true. The question is: Is this
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Graham Leggett
Use mod_proxy_http to request the document, and configure mod_ssl to
handle the SSL - there should be no need to write any code as
far as I can
see.
I guess a subrequest with subrequest-filename starting with proxy: should do
the
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Colm MacCarthaigh
After that, based on your excellent summary, I'm begining to see the
wisdom of a subproject - despite the overhead, maximising developer
involvement and the potential community size is much more important.
Just for my
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Roy T. Fielding
The sane solution would be to convince the US government to remove
encryption from the export control list, since that regulation has
been totally ineffective. That is not likely to happen during this
I totally agree, but I fear
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton [
Would only committers count as participating in the project
for this
purpose, do you think? Random people submitting patches would not?
Stupid question: How can someone who is not allowed to download the sources
can submit patches?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton [
Thanks for doing the research, Roy.
Yep, thanks from me too.
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:03:33PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Okay, let me put it in a different way. The alternatives are
1) retain the status quo, forbid
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Colm MacCarthaigh
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:16:48AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The group of people who concern me are not those in T-8,
they are those who
live in jurisdictions where *they* would be breaking local
law by possessing
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Querna
Currently, it might be more, since the server hosting the
mail archives,
ajax, has an rsync that can take longer than an hour to
complete... so,
it might be up to several hours behind, but it should never
be more than
that.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
Can you replace them with a variable, such that later on
only this variable
needs to be adjusted? Then I would be +1 for backport immediately.
Sure, done, r410828.
Thanks. +1 on backport to 2.2.x
Regards
Rüdiger
von Garrett Rooney
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Juni 2006 16:32
An: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: There should be a filter spec
I've had similar issues lately, it's very unclear how a filter setting
f-r-status or f-r-status_line should act. Depending on what
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Brian Akins
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
This patch takes advantage of the possibility to do the
size-check of
the file to be cached early.
obj-vobj = dobj = apr_pcalloc(r-pool, sizeof(*dobj));
Shouldn't this be in mod_cache so that
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Querna
Brian Akins wrote:
Does it make more sens at this time to do all these changes
in another
module and leave mod_disk_cache as stable and useable?
call it disk2 or
something...
If its in trunk, thats fine, I wouldn't support
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Niklas Edmundsson
Gesendet: Montag, 29. Mai 2006 10:37
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: mod_disk_cache read-while-caching patch (try2)
Since I haven't got any reply on the mail I sent on Thursday I assume
that it has been buried in the
Someone an idea why at least the httpd lists do not get refreshed any more in
the mod_mbox
archive on mail-archives.apache.org? The latest entries e.g. for
bugs@httpd.apache.org are
rather old.
Regards
Rüdiger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
von Garrett Rooney
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Mai 2006 17:34
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mail-archives.apache.org not refreshed
Someone an idea why at least the httpd lists do not get
refreshed any more in the mod_mbox
archive on
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
...
@@ -375,15 +380,18 @@
}
}
else {
-scheme = http;
+scheme = ap_http_scheme(r);
}
cache_storage.c: In function `cache_generate_key_default':
cache_storage.c:383: warning: assignment
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
1. This is an API change which might be hard to backport.
2. I do not really like the close tie between the storage provider
and the filter chain. It forces the provider to do things it
should not care about from my point of
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
The way I would expect it to work would be by passing f-next
in to the
store_body callback, it looks doomed to eat RAM as currently
designed.
mod_disk_cache's store_body implementation can then do:
1. read bucket(s) from brigade,
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Graham Leggett
* Don't block the requesting thread when requestng a large uncached
item, cache in the background and reply while caching
(currently it
stalls).
This is great, in doing this you've been solving a proxy bug that was
first
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Graham Leggett
The reason it does not work currently is that that a local file
usually is
delivered in one brigade with, depending on the size of the
file, one or
more
file buckets.
Hmmm - ok, this makes sense.
Something I've never
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Niklas Edmundsson
Correct. When caching a 4.3GB file on a 32bit arch it gets so
bad that
mmap eats all your address space and the thing segfaults. I initally
thought it was eating memory, but that's only if you have mmap
disabled.
Ahh, good
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Plüm, Rüdiger,
Also +1 (compiled and started) on
Solaris 8, gcc 3.3.2
Solaris 9, gcc 3.3.2
Forgot to mention: Both Solaris SPARC
Regards
Rüdiger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Colm MacCarthaigh
Candidate tarballs for 2.0.57 are now available for testing/voting at;
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This doesn't include a changed notice-of-license text though,
which is a
potential open issue.
Compiled and
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Colm MacCarthaigh
Candidate tarballs for 2.0.57 are now available for testing/voting at;
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This doesn't include a changed notice-of-license text though,
which is a
potential open issue.
Also +1
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
I think that the Proxy FastCGI module is at a point where
we should consider folding it into trunk, with the hope
of it being backported to 2.2.x and some not-too-distant
future.
Comments?
Questions:
I am a lazy guy :-).
Would
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Brandon Fosdick
At this point I'm not sure if I should bother trying the
large file hack for 2.0.55 or just start migrating to 2.2.x.
This no longer seems to be a large file problem, but I'm not
sure what kind of problem it is. Judging by the
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ian Holsman
- mod_cache_requestor (which i don't think really took off)
I guess one of the reasons why mod_cache_requestor did not take off was its
dependency on an external http client library. So what about creating
a http client library and adding
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Colm MacCarthaigh
There are some 2.0.56 candidate tarballs now at;
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
available for review/voting.
Compiled and started on the following environments:
Solaris 8, gcc 3.3.2
Solaris 9, gcc 3.3.2
Compiled
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Querna
*cough* serf *cough*
http://svn.webdav.org/repos/projects/serf/trunk
I know :-).
But I would like to see this inside the apr framework as it
seems to me that serf has some acceptance problems here in the httpd
community. Please
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: William A. Rowe, Jr.
It's fixed in head and the coming release of 2.2, and
probably 2.0 as well
although I have to look at my notes if the backport was committed.
Yes, it was backported (Changes with 2.0.56):
*) Elimiated the NET_TIME filter,
69 matches
Mail list logo
