Dr. Mark Adler on ZLIB memory leaks

Hello all... Kevin Kiley here.. I spent the day talking to Dr. Mark Adler ( co-author of ZLIB ) with the specific focus being certain issues that are on the table here at the Apache forum. As Peter (Cranstone) and I mentioned in the exchange last week ( but things got lost in the noise )

Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap

In a message dated 01-09-08 01:29:57 EDT, Ian wrote... looking back at justin's original request. the code was posted ~1 month ago. he reviewed it, he thought it was OK. and asked.. 'guys.. should we have this module included?' a simple enough question. Yes, it was... ( a

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

Hi Justin... Kevin Kiley here... Justin wrote... FWIW, we're discussing Ian's mod_gz not Remote Communication's mod_gzip since an Apache 2.0 version of mod_gzip has not been submitted to the Apache Group for inclusion. -- justin Jim Jagielski asked... Can I ask why the rush? Let's

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

In a message dated 01-09-06 19:30:47 EDT, Justin wrote... I think this functionality belongs in the core (not as a sub-project or as a separate standalone module). That's it. Fair enough. Thanks for the quick reply. You won't get any argument from me on that point. I was saying that

Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap

Greg Stein wrote... Kevin Kiley asked... What's it going to take to find out once and for all if ZLIB can be included in the Apache source tree? It won't go in. No need for it. That hasn't been well-stated... It has now, it seems ( finally! ). Only takes one veto and looks

Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0

In a message dated 01-09-05 14:16:59 EDT, Marc Slemko wrote... This is not technical, this is social and political. Then keep it off the forum... you fucking didactic self-righteous asshole. When was the last fucking time you posted anything useful? Send your 'social and political'

Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap

In a message dated 01-09-05 14:28:29 EDT, you write: That's wonderful news for users. No longer do they download the tarball, build it, and enable the features they want, now they trawl the web looking for this module and that module - assuming they even know the modules exist in the

Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap

In a message dated 01-09-05 14:44:54 EDT, Marc Selmko wrote... And your motives are entirely altruistic? Why do I have problems with that? See, if you were going about this right it would not be RC versus AG, it would be 'us'. See previous message reagrding 'didactic self-righteous

Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0

In a message dated 01-09-05 14:16:59 EDT, Marc wrote... After 3-4 years we know exactly how you work. Oh? Then what is the explanation for Kevin publicly soliciting an individual to do something that recent discussion has shown the group considers moot? I asked him what he

Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0

In a message dated 01-09-05 16:14:01 EDT, you write: This is news to me, and certainly no permission has been given to either Compaq nor Covalent to call anything a 'Compaq Apache server.' I am on the ASF board and I can tell you this has not come before us. Actually... it's called the

Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap

In a message dated 01-09-05 17:29:58 EDT, you write: True enough for everyone. (Except any who might be here as a job assignment.) The question I asked was, 'Why do you want to be here?' An answer of 'none of your business' is perfectly acceptable (though probably not constructive),

Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0

In a message dated 01-09-05 17:43:30 EDT, you write: From: Peter J. Cranstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Kiss my ass... *delurk* That'll motivate three +1's for mod_gz real quick. :^) (No need for anyone to reply. Just cluttering the list with sophomoric humor.) -Charels

Covalent Apache Web Server

In a message dated 01-09-05 16:14:01 EDT, Kevin Kiley wrote... This is news to me, and certainly no permission has been given to either Compaq nor Covalent to call anything a 'Compaq Apache server.' I am on the ASF board and I can tell you this has not come before us.

Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap

Hello all... Due to comments made in a private email to myself and my company from one of your top level board members this is to inform everyone that we can stop this nonsense right now because there will BE no submission of mod_gzip for Apache 2.0 to this group. It shall remain a ( fully

There will be no mod_gzip included in 2.0

Hello all... Due to comments made in a private email to myself and my company from one of your top level board members this is to inform everyone that we can stop this nonsense right now because there will BE no submission of mod_gzip for Apache 2.0 to this group. It shall remain a ( fully

Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0

In a message dated 01-09-04 09:35:50 EDT, Jim wrote... That's right and one of them is... Will Apache accept ZLIB into the Apache source tree in either source or binary library format for all platforms. Check one box only... [__] Yes [__] No Actually, it's not a

Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0

In a message dated 01-09-04 12:39:44 EDT, Guenter writes... Guenter Knauf wrote... Hi, I was glad as Ian contributed his mod_gz; I tested it on Linux and Win32 and it works for me. What did you test? that it compiles, loads into server and compresses. How 'heavily loaded'

Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0

In a message dated 01-09-03 04:55:08 EDT, Henri Gomez writes... Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you want to use gzip, then zip your data before putting it on-line. That doesn't help generated pages, but perl can already do gzip, as can PHP. Let me expose my mod_gzip user

Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0

Hello all... Kevin Kiley here... Here is a mixture of comment/response regarding mod_gzip and the ongoing conversation(s)... There is a (short) SUMMARY at the bottom. Justin ErenKrantz's original post... Ian has posted his mod_gz filter before, now I'd like to give it a +1. I told him I'd

<    1   2