On 12/21/19 7:37 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
Le ven. 20 déc. 2019 à 19:02, Nick Kew a écrit :
I take it you have a good reason to want that rather than a packaged version
such as Debian's?
I'd like to provide a patch to a (whishlist) bug report I've done (#63079).
What did buildconf tell
On 09/03/2013 05:06 AM, Steffen wrote:
On 8/30/2013 5:25 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Please let me know if you
* are waiting for some certain feature (other than near perfection) before
you use it
After some days puzzling, I realize now that it looks like you want to
accomplish an ASF
Jérôme Renard wrote:
Good afternoon,
I have been developping an Apache module which uses the DBD framework.
I get the following issue :
If I call a URL which belongs to my test virtual host, like
http://myvhost.lo/test/foo-bar
everything works fine.
However if I try a completely different
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
Tom Donovan wrote:
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
I'm now trying to set up mod_authn_dbb for authentication purpose.
However, I faced to a concern for AuthDBDUserRealmQuery directive.
The example shows the query:
AuthDBDUserRealmQuery \
SELECT password FROM authn WHERE user
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
Tom Donovan wrote:
Yes, SQL *functions* only return a single value - but if your database
supports SQL *stored procedures* (like the example), they return a set
of rows; including any extra values to be assigned to environment
variables. For example:
DROP PROCEDURE
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
I'm now trying to set up mod_authn_dbb for authentication purpose.
However, I faced to a concern for AuthDBDUserRealmQuery directive.
The example shows the query:
AuthDBDUserRealmQuery \
SELECT password FROM authn WHERE user = %s AND realm = %s
But, I would like to
Andrej van der Zee wrote:
* apr_dbd_pvquery is only for string values.
You must use apr_dbd_pvbquery (with a b) for binary values.
see:
http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr-util/1.3/group___a_p_r___util___d_b_d.html
I tried both versions, but without success. But that was because I did not
pass
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: tdonovan
Date: Wed Oct 15 05:24:25 2008
New Revision: 704883
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=704883view=rev
Log:
Windows: add apr_dbd_odbc project to Visual Studio workspace .dsw file
Hmmm? Guess I'm confused, we trigger
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
.msi*'s to direct at /dist/httpd/binaries/win32/, -symbols.zip*'s to direct
at archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/symbols/, and the usual
httpd-2.2.10-win32-src.zip* files are all in the usual /dev/dist/ location.
I noticed a few little things building
Nick Kew wrote:
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:30:49 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remove proposal accidentally added twice
I was about to ask whether you planned to vote on the other
instance of it, when I saw:
Looking at the backport to 2.2 votes in STATUS, they all seem to be from experienced
Kevac Marko wrote:
Hello.
Is there any way in mod_dbd to connect to more than one database server?
Yes - but only for different virtual hosts.
You can put different mod_dbd directives within different VirtualHost sections. You can even use
different DBDriver and DBDParams if you have
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/20/2008 11:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: tdonovan
Date: Fri Jun 20 14:12:34 2008
New Revision: 670061
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=670061view=rev
Log:
After r649840, mod_proxy_http will no longer append a query string
from r-args if no-canon.
APR 1.3 will require a code change in Windows modules which launch FastCGI programs using
apr_proc_create. They will need to use the new APR_NO_FILE attribute. This doesn't affect any
other platforms AFAIK.
e.g.
apr_procattr_io_set(attr, NULL, APR_NO_FILE, APR_NO_FILE);
This was
Jim Jagielski wrote:
It's my intent to TR 2.2.9 today...
The Windows support\htpasswd.dsp project file now needs to link with rpcrt4.lib to use
apr_generate_random_bytes - per r662572.
-tom-
p.s. - I don't have httpd commit access yet, so hopefully someone else can make this change in time
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It works on XP and Vista, what more do you need?
Someone to independently confirm - thanks Gav :)
I tested your ApacheMonitor.exe.r652599 and ApacheMonitorU.exe.r652599 from
http://people.apache.org/~wrowe on Win2k, XP, Vista.
Also
Robert Schulze wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on a module to create virtualhosts on the fly out
of a cdb-database file.
...
In one module I saw the following:
request_rec *top = (r-main)?r-main:r;
/* ... */
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
I'l actually not sure if mod_ftp has a separate list... so I'll send it here.
On the page it says to fetch the trunk and build it.
But the trunk doesn't build!
Adding a message saying it won't build or maybe keep a prelease branch
that does compile and work on trunk so
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Tom Donovan wrote:
Steffen wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Tom Donovan's confirmed the state of mpm_winnt as again working
with mod perl across service, console, and -X modes (and some
other slightly more obscure models).
I'll backport the correction to 2.0.63
Steffen wrote:
- Original Message - From: William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 07 January, 2008 19:52
Subject: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7
available
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Tom Donovan's confirmed the
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Steffen wrote:
mod_perl on Windows 2.2.7
Using http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/ with ActivePerl 5.8.8.822
FAILS
I'd be happy to see a fix; yes I consider 'as a console' to be a test
environment, but I also consider it to be very useful and worth fixing.
Even
Steffen wrote:
Looks like that it happens only when add Win32DisableAcceptEx to the conf.
Steffen
On 01/05/2008 11:36 AM, Steffen wrote:
It crashes when apr_bucket_alloc() is called by modules
...
\srclib\apr-util\buckets\apr_buckets_alloc.c
+ list 0x00b71f10 {pool=0x00b6ff08
Yes, the crash dissappears.
I built with MS Visual Studio 8 on win2k and tested on win2k, winxp, and vista.
Also tried it with:
ab -n 10 -c 100 http://localhost/large_file.html
Where large_file.html is 200kb. No continued memory growth observed (after the first few seconds),
so I
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Feedback from Ben via legal-discuss, since his httpd-dev list seems
to have fallen over and can't get up.
Bill
Subject:
Re: [Fwd: Re: Thoughts on Camillia in openssl binaries?]
From:
Ben Laurie
New topic - was Thoughts on Camillia in openssl binaries?
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Tom Donovan wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Two questions, one technical one legal.
On a slightly-related note; it might also be a good change to statically
link zlib into OpenSSL to avoid the need
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Two questions, one technical one legal.
Technically, do we want to enable the Camillia algorithms in our
binary builds of openssl 0.9.8 for win32 and other platforms where
we might build it?
Legally are we satisfied by
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
But if mod_deflate doesn't use it, and openssl is built zlib-dynamic,
they simply pitched compression from ssl sessions as well with no other
adverse effects.
Yes, exactly. openssl doesn't select gzip compression if zlib-dynamic
and zlib1.dll is missing.
The other
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Many thanks to Ruediger for reviewing 2.0 and 2.2 so far, and to both
Jim and Jeff for their reviews of current/2.2 modern flavors. I could
use a set of eyeballs on the final log.c patch for 2.2, and the patch
set for our old 'n crusty 2.0.
I'm especially interested
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
doesn't belong on any external site. Since it's not an ASF release,
*you* are absorbing all the liability and risk that any released ASF
package would carry. It's an apachelounge release, so you would
personally answer to any IP issues. Not smart.
Issac
Nick Kew wrote:
I've got back to reviewing Chris's substantial fixes to mod_dbd in trunk,
and I'm prepared to give it my +1. The alternative is to apply simpler
fixes by Bojan and others.
On the plus side, Chris's work fixes some known (and hard) issues with
mod_dbd,
and feedback has been
Danie Qian wrote:
It is working a little better now after I set both DBDKeep and DBDMin to
zero. But I am still getting the internal server error from time to
time. Users usually can get pass the error by reloading the same page.
Here is the error messages in the log:
[Sat Jul 07
Danie Qian wrote:
Thank you for the kind words. I am a little overwhelmed by the
complexity of mod_dbd.c, especially its use of dbd_group_t. I couldnt
find any notes for it so I wish someone here could shed some light on it
for me and anyone interested.
There do not seem to any group-related
Danie Qian wrote:
With this patch, setting DBDTimout lower than the MySQL system variable
'wait_timeout' will ensure than expired connections never get used.
Assuming by DBDTimeout you mean DBDExptime in mod_dbd documentation
where it implies a keepalive value, how about making mod_dbd
Joachim Zobel wrote:
Hi.
I am currently trying to track down a glibc memory corruption. To do
this I tried the following (see below). This is done on prefork.
However no logging takes place. Is there something obvious I am doing
wrong?
Thx,
Joachim
14:54, Tom Donovan wrote:
If procedures only require input parameters and return a result set
(like the example procedure GROUP_SP in mod_auth_ibmdb2) - they can be
invoked by apr_dbd_select with the SQL statement:
CALL GROUP_SP(?)
If this is the case then DBD does support stored procedures
Joachim Zobel wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2007, 14:03 +0100 schrieb Helmut Tessarek:
Writing stored procedures is usually part of the DBA, but if the database server
is not on the same machine as the web server, stored procedures are most of the
time faster than SQL statements invoked from
re: the Windows 2000 0.0.0.0 IP address problem
Bill,
Both solutions work.
Applying win32sock_is_known.patch corrects the problem for win2000.
The Win32DisableAcceptEx directive also works to correct the problem (without
the patch).
-tom-
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It's actually
re: start an incident at Microsoft
I'll try - but since Win2000 is in what MS calls Extended support phase, only security bugs are
accepted. I'll describe it as creatively as I can...
re: I don't see this as a showstopper
True. The Win32DisableAcceptEx directive certainly works.
There
I have had some difficulties running 2.2.4 RC on Windows 2000.
The remote IP is always seen as 0.0.0.0.
Here are a few lines from my logs\access.log:
0.0.0.0 - - [07/Jan/2007:11:22:59 -0500] GET /server-status HTTP/1.1 403 215
0.0.0.0 - - [07/Jan/2007:11:23:36 -0500] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 20417
I
re: the Windows 2000 0.0.0.0 IP address problem
A quick look through win32/sockets.c shows code to fill in remote_addr after accept() and connect(),
as well as after acceptEx(). This led me to believe that Windows has the peer name.
Ditto for the win9x_*() functions in Apache
39 matches
Mail list logo
