Martin Kraemer wrote:
About the X-Forwarded-* stuff: It's non-standard anyway (you can add
any X-whatever header and still be RFC2616 compliant) so I'd rather
not see it in 1.3 now (maybe in the next release ;-)
I've seen proxies like squid hang because of nonstandard headers
Thomas Eibner wrote:
Anyone looked at the remaining open bugs in 1.3 and might want to include
this patch (and bug)?
Only if someone can verify that this patch actually does anything. The
proxy has been largely rewritten since then, so this bug might not still
be outstanding.
There is a
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:47:20PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Thomas Eibner wrote:
Anyone looked at the remaining open bugs in 1.3 and might want to include
this patch (and bug)?
Only if someone can verify that this patch actually does anything. The
proxy has been largely rewritten
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 07:10:25PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Thomas Eibner wrote:
Looking at apache-1.3 in cvs VS httpd-2.0 there seems to be a few
changes, and the X-Forwarded-* headers are some of them. I have a
patch ready if needed (with what I believe are your comments in
it).
Thomas Eibner wrote:
Ah yes, X-Forwarded-For is there, but not the two others there is in
2.0 (X-Forwarded-Server and X-Forwared-Host) I read in the source that
someone thinks it needs to go into the Via header instead. And as I can
read from the source, X-Forwarded-For is only sent when
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 07:20:17PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Thomas Eibner wrote:
Ah yes, X-Forwarded-For is there, but not the two others there is in
2.0 (X-Forwarded-Server and X-Forwared-Host) I read in the source that
someone thinks it needs to go into the Via header instead. And
Thomas Eibner wrote:
Inline patch here, but I'm wondering if you want the X-Forwarded-For
header to be stuck inside the conditional too?
I think it should be... will sort this out later tonight or first thing
tomorrow, have to leave the internet cafe now to fetch someone.
Regards,
Graham
--
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 07:44:16PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Thomas Eibner wrote:
Inline patch here, but I'm wondering if you want the X-Forwarded-For
header to be stuck inside the conditional too?
I think it should be... will sort this out later tonight or first thing
tomorrow,
At 01:30 PM 05/29/2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:
Index: proxy_http.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/apache-1.3/src/modules/proxy/proxy_http.c,v
retrieving revision 1.98
diff -u -r1.98 proxy_http.c
--- proxy_http.c21 Apr 2002
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:02:53PM -0400, Greg Marr wrote:
At 01:30 PM 05/29/2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:
Index: proxy_http.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/apache-1.3/src/modules/proxy/proxy_http.c,v
retrieving revision 1.98
diff
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 08:18:53PM +0200, Thomas Eibner wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:02:53PM -0400, Greg Marr wrote:
At 01:30 PM 05/29/2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:
Index: proxy_http.c
===
RCS file:
Now is not the time to be adding in code whilly-nilly...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 06:28:24PM +0200, Thomas Eibner wrote:
From: Anthony Howe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [apache-modules] Setting bytes_sent in Request Record while generating
all headers by myself in Apache 1.3
Number: 6841
ap_kill_timeout(r);
+
+
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:44:16PM +0200, Martin Kraemer wrote:
Yes, the patch was correct (IMHO) and yes, I committed this one.
About the X-Forwarded-* stuff: It's non-standard anyway (you can add
any X-whatever header and still be RFC2616 compliant) so I'd rather
not see it in 1.3 now
14 matches
Mail list logo
