On Dec 21, 2004, at 1:03 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Dec 21, 2004, at 11:21 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can we use a separate flag to specific protocol version?
To address both your and André's response, yes we can. I even found an
unused letter that makes sense: -m for 'method'. And yes, I'll
The following patch (inline and attached) expands the experimental -s
flag to ab to specify the SSL version used for the benchmark run. Valid
versions are SSLv2, SSLv3, TLSv1 and ANY in which case the program will
use the highest version available. This code is active when httpd is
configured
* Sander Temme wrote:
The following patch (inline and attached) expands the experimental -s
flag to ab to specify the SSL version used for the benchmark run. Valid
versions are SSLv2, SSLv3, TLSv1 and ANY in which case the program will
use the highest version available. This code is active
At 01:15 PM 12/21/2004, Sander Temme wrote:
The following patch (inline and attached) expands the experimental -s flag to
ab to specify the SSL version used for the benchmark run. Valid versions are
SSLv2, SSLv3, TLSv1 and ANY in which case the program will use the highest
version available.
On Dec 21, 2004, at 11:21 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can we use a separate flag to specific protocol version?
To address both your and André's response, yes we can. I even found an
unused letter that makes sense: -m for 'method'. And yes, I'll do a 2.1
patch. The reason my personal itch was
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 01:03:13PM -0800, Sander Temme wrote:
On Dec 21, 2004, at 11:21 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can we use a separate flag to specific protocol version?
To address both your and André's response, yes we can. I even found an
unused letter that makes sense: -m for
On Dec 21, 2004, at 1:12 PM, Mads Toftum wrote:
Could this be similar to openssl s_client - ssl2, ssl3, ... and the
no_ssl2, no_ssl3 etc? Just like you might want to specify a specific
version, I could see where it would be nice to go the other way and
remove a specific cipher.
That's right, this
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 02:02:46PM -0800, Sander Temme wrote:
We're also not talking about Ciphers here, just protocol versions. It
figures out the ciphersuites for itself. I figure if we want to get
that sophisticated, we'd better pour our energy into flood instead of
ab.
Cipher was a
This is the httpd-trunk version of the patch discussed under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11036567171r=1w=2). It adds a -m
flag to ab that allows you to enforce the SSL version used by ab on the
command line.
I also updated the ab.xml documentation file, but how do I
* Sander Temme wrote:
This is the httpd-trunk version of the patch discussed under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11036567171r=1w=2). It adds a -m
flag to ab that allows you to enforce the SSL version used by ab on the
command line.
I also updated the ab.xml
10 matches
Mail list logo
