Re: [PATCH] enable static support binaries at build-time

2002-02-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:12:42PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:23:08PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote: This does _not_ add support for a static httpd, since that issue is not yet decided, but it should solve 7 of the 8

[PATCH] enable static support binaries at build-time

2002-02-07 Thread Aaron Bannert
This patch solves a release showstopper by allowing the support binaries to be built statically against apr/apr-util/etc. It also adds static support for the htdbm tool. This does _not_ add support for a static httpd, since that issue is not yet decided, but it should solve 7 of the 8 binaries

Re: [PATCH] enable static support binaries at build-time

2002-02-07 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:23:08PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote: This patch solves a release showstopper by allowing the support binaries to be built statically against apr/apr-util/etc. It also adds static support for the htdbm tool. This does _not_ add support for a static httpd, since that

Re: [PATCH] enable static support binaries at build-time

2002-02-07 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:12:42PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:23:08PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote: This does _not_ add support for a static httpd, since that issue is not yet decided, but it should solve 7 of the 8 binaries that Ken was worried about. The