Re: [RFC] Merge wombat-integration into trunk

2008-12-10 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:43:57AM -0800, Paul Querna wrote: > Trunk is CTR, but I do want to make sure no one is completely opposed to > pulling in mod_wombat. +1, go for it. For the record, I'd be happy for lua to become a mandatory or strongly-recommended dependency such that we could remov

Re: [RFC] Merge wombat-integration into trunk

2008-12-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Dec 5, 2008, at 2:00 PM, Paul Querna wrote: Nick Kew wrote: On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:43:57 -0800 Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Trunk is CTR, but I do want to make sure no one is completely opposed to pulling in mod_wombat. In a dev branch, I've done the work to pull it all togeth

Re: [RFC] Merge wombat-integration into trunk

2008-12-05 Thread Paul Querna
Nick Kew wrote: On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:43:57 -0800 Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Trunk is CTR, but I do want to make sure no one is completely opposed to pulling in mod_wombat. In a dev branch, I've done the work to pull it all together: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/br

Re: [RFC] Merge wombat-integration into trunk

2008-12-05 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:43:57 -0800 Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trunk is CTR, but I do want to make sure no one is completely opposed > to pulling in mod_wombat. > > In a dev branch, I've done the work to pull it all together: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/wo

Re: [RFC] Merge wombat-integration into trunk

2008-12-05 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Paul Querna wrote: [1] - I did this because tackling the apreq issue is way more complicated -- the work around I did for parsing POST bodies for example is completely unacceptable in the long run, but it 'works' for now -- In the long run we should import at least parts of apreq. I'm particul

Re: [RFC] Merge wombat-integration into trunk

2008-12-05 Thread Brian McCallister
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trunk is CTR, but I do want to make sure no one is completely opposed to > pulling in mod_wombat. > > In a dev branch, I've done the work to pull it all together: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/wombat

Re: [RFC] Merge wombat-integration into trunk

2008-12-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Paul Querna wrote: > Trunk is CTR, but I do want to make sure no one is completely opposed to > pulling in mod_wombat. > > Any opposition to merging it to trunk? None at all > [1] - I did this because tackling the apreq issue is way more > complicated -- the work around I did for parsing POST bo

[RFC] Merge wombat-integration into trunk

2008-12-05 Thread Paul Querna
Trunk is CTR, but I do want to make sure no one is completely opposed to pulling in mod_wombat. In a dev branch, I've done the work to pull it all together: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/wombat-integration https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/wombat-integ