[VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at: Your votes please; +/- 1 [ ] Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha Vote closes at 18:00 UTC on Sunday November 15 2009. Thanks, Paul

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

Paul Querna wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at: > > > Your votes please; > > +/- 1 > [ ] Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha -1 for bundled package httpd-2.3.3-alpha-deps - in fact this isn't up to date w.r.t. pcre 8. Otherw

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

On 11/11/2009 08:54 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at: > > > Your votes please; > > +/- 1 > [ ] Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha > > Vote closes at 18:00 UTC on Sunday November 15 2009. -1: mod_ssl does

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:36 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Paul Querna wrote: >> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at: >>     >> >> Your votes please; >> >>  +/- 1 >>  [  ]  Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha > > -1 for bundled package httpd

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

Paul Querna wrote: > > the -deps package does not contain PCRE at all. The only software > contained inside the -deps package is APR and APR-Util, so I am not > quite sure what your comment about PCRE 8 is referencing. Didn't realize that was dropped... ...if we presume sense and sensibility of

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Paul Querna wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at: >     > > Your votes please; > >  +/- 1 >  [  ]  Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha > > Vote closes at 18:00 UTC on Sunday November 15 2009. > www.apach

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Paul Querna wrote: >> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at: >>     >> >> Your votes please; >> >>  +/- 1 >>  [  ]  Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha >> >> V

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

Hello, I did not get far inet_pton.c multicast.c Generating Code... Compiling... socket_util.c E:\build\httpd-2.3.3-alpha\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\socket_util.c(21) : error C2373: 'apr_socket_atreadeof' : redefinition; different type modifiers ./include\apr_network_io.h(362) : see de

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

Gregg L. Smith wrote: > Hello, > > I did not get far > > Generating Code... > socket_util.c > E:\build\httpd-2.3.3-alpha\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\socket_util.c(21) > : error C2373: 'apr_socket_atreadeof' : redefinition; different type > modifiers > ./include\apr_network_io.h(362) : see

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

> E:\build\httpd-2.3.3-alpha\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\socket_util.c(21) > : error C2373: 'apr_socket_atreadeof' : redefinition; different type > modifiers > ./include\apr_network_io.h(362) : see declaration of > 'apr_socket_atreadeof' This is probably nothing but missing/mismatched APR_D

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

Sorry bout that, I always try first with VS6 SP6 SDK 2003R2 I'm more curious why it is trying to build the 'unix' file in the first place since there is a Win32 alternative Gregg William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Gregg L. Smith wrote: Hello, I did not get far Generating Code... socket_util.c E:

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

2009/11/12 Paul Querna : > Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at: >     > > Your votes please; > >  +/- 1 >  [  ]  Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha > > Vote closes at 18:00 UTC on Sunday November 15 2009. > > Thanks, > > Paul > What APR/APR-UTIL

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

Hello again, While were at it. I dropped in APR/Util 1.3.9 and had a go at it. I'll guess this error is because of it but in case it isn't; Configuration: mod_ldap - Win32 Release Compiling resources... Compiling... util_ldap.c E:\build\httpd-2.3.3-alpha\

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

Gregg L. Smith wrote: > Hello again, > > While were at it. > I dropped in APR/Util 1.3.9 and had a go at it. > Compiling... > util_ldap.c > E:\build\httpd-2.3.3-alpha\modules\ldap\util_ldap.c(2667) : error C2065: > 'AP_LDAP_OPT_DEBUG' : undeclared identifier This looks like a purely httpd error;

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

Hi Bill, I know this, even better now ;) ... will remember to pay more attention. Since I have your eyes yet again, makefile.win wants to copy pcre.pdb but my out-of-tree pcre does not include that file, the .dll is there, not the pdb. Can this made to make noise only and not stop the copy pr

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > 2009/11/12 Paul Querna : >> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at: >>     >> >> Your votes please; >> >>  +/- 1 >>  [  ]  Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha >> >> Vote closes at 18:00 UTC

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

2009/11/12 Paul Querna : > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Graham Dumpleton > wrote: >> 2009/11/12 Paul Querna : >>> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at: >>>     >>> >>> Your votes please; >>> >>>  +/- 1 >>>  [  ]  Release httpd-2.3.3 as

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

2009/11/12 Graham Dumpleton : > 2009/11/12 Paul Querna : >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Graham Dumpleton >> wrote: >>> 2009/11/12 Paul Querna : Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at:     Your votes please;

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

FWIW, the @??@ symbols are coming from apu-1-config because they are never expanded by configure script for apr-util. Ie., snippet from apu-1-config is: LIBS="-lexpat -liconv" INCLUDES="" LDFLAGS="" LDAP_LIBS="" DBM_LIBS="@LDADD_dbm_db@ @LDADD_dbm_gdbm@ @LDADD_dbm_ndbm@" APRUTIL_LIBNAME="aprutil-

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

2009/11/12 Graham Dumpleton : > FWIW, the @??@ symbols are coming from apu-1-config because they are > never expanded by configure script for apr-util. Ie., snippet from > apu-1-config is: > > LIBS="-lexpat -liconv" > INCLUDES="" > LDFLAGS="" > LDAP_LIBS="" > DBM_LIBS="@LDADD_dbm_db@ @LDADD_dbm_gdb

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > 2009/11/12 Graham Dumpleton : >> FWIW, the @??@ symbols are coming from apu-1-config because they are >> never expanded by configure script for apr-util. Ie., snippet from >> apu-1-config is: >> >> LIBS="-lexpat -liconv" >> INCLUDES="" >>

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

On Nov 11, 2009, at 2:54 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at: > > > Your votes please; > > +/- 1 > [ ] Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha > > Vote closes at 18:00 UTC on Sunday November 15 2009. > With OS X 1

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

Graham Dumpleton wrote: > Are the branches I used the correct thing to use. yes. > I noticed there was no trunk for apr-util: > > $ svn list http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util > branches/ > tags/ > > and since had to use branch for that, assumed was supposed to use > branch for apr a

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

Gregg L. Smith wrote: Sorry bout that, I always try first with VS6 SP6 SDK 2003R2 William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Gregg L. Smith wrote: Generating Code... socket_util.c E:\build\httpd-2.3.3-alpha\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\socket_util.c(21) : error C2373: 'apr_socket_atreadeof' : redefinition; diffe

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

Gregg L. Smith wrote: > Gregg L. Smith wrote: >> Sorry bout that, >> I always try first with VS6 SP6 SDK 2003R2 >> William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >>> Gregg L. Smith wrote: Generating Code... socket_util.c E:\build\httpd-2.3.3-alpha\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\socket_util.c(21) : erro

Re: [VOTE] release 2.3.3 as alpha

It's 03:00 UTC 11/16 but the vote failed anyway. Some things that have not been addressed. Basically, SSL doesn't work or there's new directives not documented yet. mod_ssl: r835046 + OpenSSL 0.9.8L + working config from 2.2.14 PKCS #1 SHA-1 With RSA Encryption 2048bit certs (Real, not self-sign