From: Victor J. Orlikowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ugh. Behind on mail.
My fault; needed it for cadaver for testing... ;)
Victor: You need a little context on your mail. I don't know about others,
but I have no idea what you are replying to.
Joshua.
My apologies.
The context was to provide a semi-humorous reply to the breakage I
caused Jeff by installing Expat on the AIX box we use.
Been a while since the mail, been a while since I posted last.
Grrr. ;)
Victor
--
Victor J. Orlikowski | The Wall is Down, But the Threat Remains!
Victor J. Orlikowski wrote:
Ugh. Behind on mail.
My fault; needed it for cadaver for testing... ;)
Why do I feel like I just entered an episode of 6 Feet Under? :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the NW patch is in there.
the non-crap tarballs are in the /dist directory.
+1 for FreeBSD 3.4...
I unpacked it, did binbuild, did the binbuild installation, and
hammered* it over local LAN with 200,000 requests (mix of CGI, / to
drive lots of wrowe
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm still struggling with the tarball on AIX. I think it is just a
matter of cleaning up libtool 1.3 droplets so that a fresh buildconf
does what it is supposed to do.
That and, for me, working around the fact that somebody installed an
expat RPM on
From: Ben Hyde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:20 PM
Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:34:51PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
...
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2_0_31-alpha.tar.gz
Why can't we name our damned tarballs and resulting
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 11:03 AM
From: Ben Hyde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:20 PM
Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:34:51PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
...
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm still struggling with the tarball on AIX. I think it is just a
matter of cleaning up libtool 1.3 droplets so that a fresh buildconf
does what it is supposed to do.
That and, for me, working around the
the NW patch is in there.
the non-crap tarballs are in the /dist directory.
who would have thought making a tar ball would be so hard.
..Ian
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 04:46:58PM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote:
the NW patch is in there.
the non-crap tarballs are in the /dist directory.
who would have thought making a tar ball would be so hard.
No kidding. It'll be easier next time.
After initially thinking there was a problem with
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:34:51PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
...
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2_0_31-alpha.tar.gz
Why can't we name our damned tarballs and resulting directories like all
other packages out there?
For example: httpd-2.0.31-alpha.tar.gz
unpacks into:
According to Greg Stein:
Why can't we name our damned tarballs and resulting directories like all
other packages out there?
For example: httpd-2.0.31-alpha.tar.gz
unpacks into: ./httpd-2.0.31-alpha/
+1!
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Don't hate yourself in the morning
Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:34:51PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
...
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2_0_31-alpha.tar.gz
Why can't we name our damned tarballs and resulting directories like all
other packages out there?
A superstitious behavior involving
Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
According to Greg Stein:
Why can't we name our damned tarballs and resulting directories like all
other packages out there?
For example: httpd-2.0.31-alpha.tar.gz
unpacks into: ./httpd-2.0.31-alpha/
+1!
I just built it with the ./httpd_roll_release script
so if
14 matches
Mail list logo